County board OKs farmland program

By ANN MARIE AMES   Friday, Jan. 14, 2011
ADVERTISEMENT
 

TO LEARN MORE OR TO APPLY


If you want to learn more about Rock County’s new PACE/PDR program or if you are interested in participating, call the Rock County Planning and Development Department at (608) 757-5587 or visit www.co.rock.wi.us and click on the planning and development link under “Departments.”

Photo

Al Sweeney

— It took just short of two years to create a program that could protect some Rock County farmland forever.

The Rock County Board on Thursday unanimously approved the county’s first PACE/PDR program and the manual for the new program.

“PACE” stands for purchase of agricultural conservation easement. “PDR” stands for purchase of development rights.

The program will allow the county to pay landowners for the value of their land. The land would not be sold but would be put into a permanent easement preventing development. This could give a choice to some landowners who don’t want to sell their properties to developers but do want to realize the full value of the land.

Farmland typically brings a higher price when it is sold for development than when it is sold for continued farming.

The county in February 2009 authorized the development of an ad hoc committee to research and create the program.

The committee was made of landowners, developers, builders and representatives from local municipalities.

The goal was to “to seek a method to preserve and enhance Rock County’s agricultural and agri-business” enterprises, said Al Sweeney, county board member and chairman of the ad hoc committee.

The county immediately will solicit applications, Sweeney said. County planning and development staff members will review applications as will a newly created PACE council, Sweeney said.

Qualified applications will be forwarded to the state. Sweeney thinks Rock County properties will rate high in the state’s PDR program because of the committee’s hard work and the high quality of Rock County’s soil.

“We’re in the state’s eye,” Sweeney said.

It’s no secret that the state could cut PACE funding from the budget, Sweeney said, but that wouldn’t kill the county program. In other states, similar programs have weathered periods without state cash.

As an alternative, the county could seek grant money or private money to pay landowners, Sweeney said. Or, landowners could donate property in exchange for tax credits, he said. The county also has $700,000 set aside for use in the PACE program.

To get the best land for the buck, the ad hoc committee designed a set of weighted criteria that will be used to score each property in the county. The properties with the highest scores will be the first to qualify for PACE.

The criteria include size, development pressure, soil quality, whether the parcel is in a transportation corridor and the proximity of the land to environmentally sensitive areas.

The scores are not permanent and could change as parcels are protected under the program.

Sweeney said the collaborative work of the ad hoc committee would pave the way for other intergovernmental cooperative efforts.

“This collaboration will lead to more collaboration in the future on problems that are unique and not unique to Rock County,” Sweeney said.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(9)
RockEnvironmentalNetwork
Jan 15, 2011 at 5:23 p.m.
Suggest removal

Check out the series written about our local soils - some of the richest farmland on earth.
http://gazettextra.com/news/specialsecti...

lovemycountry
Jan 15, 2011 at 12:03 p.m.
Suggest removal

wortnik - the transmission line money is still taxpayer money, as it belongs to the citizens, not the county government. I'm of the belief all government revenue is taxpayer money. It can be used to avoid future tax increases or spent on new programs. But it always affects tax payers the same.

janesvillean
Jan 15, 2011 at 2:37 a.m.
Suggest removal

werpknarly was probably thinking of Smart Growth planning boundaries. But the cities do not have power to override an easement or development restriction (at least, not without a lengthy court battle). Only the property owners, whatever plan the city has, can decide whether and when to develop a parcel. The city only zones the land, it does not control it.

wortnik
Jan 14, 2011 at 8:46 p.m.
Suggest removal

Actually Janesvillian is correct.
The initial Pot of County money is from a recent Transmission line one time payment . The total amount was split between different projects . The PACE program got the $700,000 from that. Future monies are coming from a charge to landowners changing the land zoning, (in of itself rather controversial).
The state and fed monies are coming from taxpayers. At least with the Rock County PACE some of these dollars will flow back to Rock County (The money will be spent regardless of its merits)

Werpknarly: The plan protects Good farmland until eternity, it would be
asinine to protect land right on the borders of cities and villages. The program has identified through compromise( not always a bad thing) the lands that are most worthy to protect while still allowing for controlled urban expansion.

lovemycountry
Jan 14, 2011 at 7:52 p.m.
Suggest removal

janesvillean - currently, the state program money is coming from state tax payers (which could be cut from the budget), and the county money is coming from county tax payers.

janesvillean
Jan 14, 2011 at 6:48 p.m.
Suggest removal

Extra-territorial jurisdiction? Please expound on this fascinating concept.

werpknarly
Jan 14, 2011 at 6:34 p.m.
Suggest removal

its my understanding that most land in county that is in danger of being developed is already under "extra-territorial" jurisdition of milton, janesville, or beloit. This can not be used protect this land... as for not giving up much, i would say you do not have an idea as to how much this is really worth.

janesvillean
Jan 14, 2011 at 5:02 p.m.
Suggest removal

Actually, no, because they give up the development rights. This is closer in spirit to the county buying parkland. As the article notes, it does not necessarily use taxpayer monies.

lovemycountry
Jan 14, 2011 at 4:58 p.m.
Suggest removal

To sum up; farmers get more money from the state and county taxpayers for doing what they would normally do: farm. PACE ranks right up there with taxpayers subsidizing ethanol.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT