Bill would outlaw paying for recall signatures

By NEIL JOHNSON ( Contact )   Thursday, Dec. 29, 2011
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— A state lawmaker unveiled a bill Wednesday that he says would target "legal bribery" in the effort to recall Gov. Scott Walker.

Rep. Evan Wynn, R-Whitewater, has introduced a bill he said would eliminate a loophole in state law that allows recall petitioners to pay others in exchange for petition signatures.

The state's bribery statutes outlaw paying someone to vote or to sign nomination papers, but there's no state law on the books against paying someone to sign—or not to sign—a recall petition, Wynn said.

Wynn, who represents the 43rd Assembly District, said he learned of the issue recently after a constituent told him that someone collecting recall signatures door-to-door had paid the constituent's friend $10 to sign a petition.

Wynn has reached out to the state Government Accountability Board over the issue. He called the legal loophole "mind-boggling" and said it allows "legal bribery."

In a Dec. 22 letter to Wynn's legislative office, Government Accountability Board Director Kevin Kennedy confirmed there's nothing in state statutes that prohibits people from paying cash for recall petition signatures.

In the letter, Kennedy wrote that the GAB has no power to create rules governing recall petitions, and any changes in law would have to come out of the Legislature.

Kennedy wrote that the GAB would like some legislative reform to guard against people paying for others to sign or not to sign recall petitions, noting that such acts "would undermine public confidence in the electoral system."

The proposed bill would safeguard against acts of bribery by people who are both for and against any state recall effort.

The bill would outlaw the act of paying another person to sign—or not to sign—a recall petition by adding both to the state bribery law.

It would effectively make the act the same crime as bribing someone to vote: a felony with a $10,000 fine or up to 3 1/2 years in prison.

Wynn said he believes the loophole in statutes exists because recall elections are so infrequent.

"When they wrote the bribery statute, people honestly never thought about recalls. Up until this year, recalls weren't well discussed or that well known," Wynn said.

Wynn said he doesn't believe people paying for recall signatures is a widespread problem, but since looking into the issue he's learned of a few reported instances of people offering free pizza and gift cards in exchange for recall signatures.

Wynn also learned that prior to the recall election last summer, some people reportedly offered free alcohol in exchange for signatures to recall a Democratic state senator.

"It happens on both sides of the aisle," Wynn said.

Wynn called the proposed bill "common sense" and said he expects it to draw bipartisan support.

"Most of the people of Wisconsin, whether they're liberal or conservative, would agree that paying somebody off for a recall signature should be illegal," he said.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(67)
vatoloco
Jan 2, 2012 at 5:21 p.m.
Suggest removal

"Obama's team has built the world's most sophisticated data mining tools ever created for political campaigns"

Too bad that's all they are good at. Getting things done is a more valuable skill.

Theories and systems just don't cut it.

gbwbill
Jan 2, 2012 at 11:34 a.m.
Suggest removal

RECALL WALKER!

gbwbill
Jan 2, 2012 at 11:33 a.m.
Suggest removal

How can anyone propose legislation based on hearsay evidence?

BillyClydePuckett
Jan 2, 2012 at 11:24 a.m.
Suggest removal

"Billy: Doesn't make me nervous. I was more than ready to sign the recall petition and did so on Day 1."

Thanks Sarah. Its selfish people like you who make me feel ok about voting against the school referendum in Beloit. After all, if teachers and other public employees shouldn't have to pay a little for their own benifts, why should I have to pay for schools my childern won't use.

BillyClydePuckett
Jan 2, 2012 at 11:22 a.m.
Suggest removal

Shouldn't be too hard. Even Lotus 1-2-3 would quickly show all the fraud, duplicates, false names and addresses and people who didn't actually sign but whose names show up anyway.

poobah
Jan 2, 2012 at 11:09 a.m.
Suggest removal

BillyClydePuckett, Excel is ill-suited to be used as a database program, especially with more than 65,536 records. With 700,000+ records you should really be using MySQL or another true relational database manager. The gap in technology sophistication between Republicans and Democrats is absolutely amazing. Obama's team has built the world's most sophisticated data mining tools ever created for political campaigns and his Republican opponents are still so far behind they can't possibly catch his capabilities by November 2012. Trying to use Excel and pivot tables as a database manager for this data is just another example of this. Good luck! You'll need it.

BillyClydePuckett
Jan 2, 2012 at 9:57 a.m.
Suggest removal

Taking some time to refresh my skills in creating Pivot Tables on Excel. Looking forward to having all signatures on line in a searchable database within several days of submission (should have a lot of help as there are now over 6000 people signed up). Every time I mention this to some of the people who have signed their names to the petitions they intend to turn in they seem to get very nervous. Of course, maybe there really are 125 people living in one of slumlord Gwen Moores Milwaukee properties.

JasonTh
Jan 2, 2012 at 8:15 a.m.
Suggest removal

Here is a three step method to preventing bad things from happening to you or your party in politics:

Step 1. Identify threat to you or your party.

Step 2. Inject fear, uncertainty, doubt (FUD) into the debate.

Step 3. Invent a law to propose to prevent the FUD introduced in step 2, legitimizing the FUD in the eyes of citizens.

See VoterID law, and if I had a few minutes - many other local and state laws proposed in the last year.

SBMF2021
Jan 1, 2012 at 8:53 p.m.
Suggest removal

I like how these guys (R) always quote unidentified third party persons. Is this really a problem? Where is the data? Or is this just another republican scare tactic? Name some names.

Eagle1
Dec 30, 2011 at 10:01 p.m.
Suggest removal

Fear I agree with you get the money out of politics, corporate and union alike and dismantle the parties, the blind following that consistently shows up is extremely destructive and shows how little thought at least 80% of the voters put into who the elect, it has gotten disgusting.

antireactionary
Dec 30, 2011 at 8:38 p.m.
Suggest removal

If it is legal, it isn't bribery moron. Anymore than paying someone to produce anything else.

antireactionary
Dec 30, 2011 at 5:42 p.m.
Suggest removal

Yes, silly liberals, only a very few Republicans are allowed to purchase politicians and not your non-profit corporations whose leadership is democratically elected and whose members spend the money they earn at local businesses. Now if you were an authoritarian organization whose employees raped children while you covered it up and had a prosecutor help you who is now a supreme court member in Wisconsin that would be an entirely different story as well.

LifeLonger
Dec 30, 2011 at 4:32 p.m.
Suggest removal

It's great that all the problems in this state are solved, so that time can be spent to deal with this issue.

fearandrhetoric4dummies
Dec 30, 2011 at 4:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

I am with Poobah on his one,no more private money buying politics. No more parties, tghey are the reason America is ruined.
Vato- Happy New Year to you too. Your resolution should be to use less labels, it would make it easier to talk to you.. Mine is going to be to not know everything about everything all the time:) AND to shorten my posts for those of you with short attention spans.

wahoo_35
Dec 30, 2011 at 3:24 p.m.
Suggest removal

A Republican turning down a bribe? Now that is funny!

dkush21
Dec 30, 2011 at 3:05 p.m.
Suggest removal

vatoloco:
""Maybe Rep. Evan Wynn would also be interested in sponsoring a bill that would make it a felony for elected officials to receive campaign money and then vote for legislation that favors the donor."

Poobah

We wouldn't have a Democrat Party on any ticket then."

SORRY VATOLOCO:
We wouldn't have any party or anyone on a ticket!

dkush21
Dec 30, 2011 at 3:01 p.m.
Suggest removal

Show me the proof that this happened. Anyone can say anything. I can say someone threatened me if I did sign the petition. Just heresay. Hope I spelled that right. :)

rcosteri
Dec 30, 2011 at 2:45 p.m.
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
Feduptaxpayer
Dec 30, 2011 at 2:44 p.m.
Suggest removal

RETAIN WALKER - RECALL DA UNIONS.

antireactionary
Dec 30, 2011 at 12:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

Walker's new bill would allow him to sell government positions to his donors. Oh wait he already did that and is just another reason the FBI is investigating.

antireactionary
Dec 30, 2011 at 12:23 p.m.
Suggest removal

Stand with a Backstabber (Walker)

antireactionary
Dec 30, 2011 at 11:55 a.m.
Suggest removal

Would it outlaw paying people like Cindy Archer to blog for your campaign while working for Milwaukee County?

GoodAmerican
Dec 30, 2011 at 11:17 a.m.
Suggest removal

Evan Wynn said, "There's only room for ONE prostitute around here, and I was here first!!"

poobah
Dec 30, 2011 at 11:05 a.m.
Suggest removal

vatoloco, as a reader of my comments, you should recall I have also advocated abolishing political parties and having candidates run on their own ideas. So that would be great with me if we had no Democrat or Republican or any other party affiliation. Parties are a tool of economic elitists to create divisions in the population and obscure what they are doing to the country.

partarican1
Dec 30, 2011 at 10:26 a.m.
Suggest removal

I have not come across anyone paying people to sign the recall petitions...have any of you?
vatoloco...you are taking 1 POv about socialism and twisting it to suit the conversation-socialism takes the power away from the 1% and gives it back to the 99%, and without being a communist..

vatoloco
Dec 30, 2011 at 9:48 a.m.
Suggest removal

By the way, Happy New Year fear.

vatoloco
Dec 30, 2011 at 9:40 a.m.
Suggest removal

Or Republican.

vatoloco
Dec 30, 2011 at 9:40 a.m.
Suggest removal

"Maybe Rep. Evan Wynn would also be interested in sponsoring a bill that would make it a felony for elected officials to receive campaign money and then vote for legislation that favors the donor."

Poobah

We wouldn't have a Democrat Party on any ticket then.

vatoloco
Dec 30, 2011 at 9:38 a.m.
Suggest removal

"Evan Wynn DOES NOTHING for his constituents and is simply a rubber stamp for Scott Walker's agenda."

A Socialist theory, do everything for me because I can't think for myself and I don't have the ability to be successful on my own. Keep up the robot mentality, you parrot. I have to depend on politicians for my success, is that what they taught you fear?

GoodAmerican
Dec 30, 2011 at 8:54 a.m.
Suggest removal

Fedup--What city do you live in? You should move to Janesville. No one jumps out at us here, they just wave and smile very civilly as we drive past. You must be living in fedupland, where no truth is allowed, and hatred and intolerance are required of all.

justdontgetit
Dec 30, 2011 at 8:52 a.m.
Suggest removal

oldvet as far as out of state money I think the two million plus that Walker has recieved from out of state trumps any your so called union money used for recalls.

badger2
Dec 30, 2011 at 8:41 a.m.
Suggest removal

Wynn has proven more than once he's not the brightest person.....he heard from someone who heard it from a friend who heard it from his friend?.....yea thats proof LMAO..... an exact amendment to a bill for this was was offered by the Democrats 6 months ago and Wynn along with Every Republican voted NO....

saxcat70
Dec 30, 2011 at 8:31 a.m.
Suggest removal

Packolies said it best. if they can pay off a politician with a political lobby then what is the difference? How about passing a law against buying there votes.. I don't blame the repubs for trying this, though I think their timing and method are weak. There needs to be laws against buying politics. How to go about that is one slippery slope.

Eagle1
Dec 30, 2011 at 8:17 a.m.
Suggest removal

I rest my case... Thanks booner, you couldn't have had better timing to prove my point.

booner
Dec 30, 2011 at 8:12 a.m.
Suggest removal

Nice try wynn......u are still toast. You will be voted out. You are more concerned with your corporate friends than the people in your district.

Eagle1
Dec 30, 2011 at 7:47 a.m.
Suggest removal

I see the partisan hacks are out on this one... shocker. How is this a bad law? Poobah I completely agree they should clamp down on the political contribution loopholes as well where a politician can take bribes and yes that is what they are just as payment for a signature or vote is.

Once again instead of analyzing this on the merit of the law we would rather just start up the partisan rhetoric machine and take personal shots at Wynn. It is a good smart law one that should be passed but I would hope Mr. Wynn would work on legislation to help eliminate corporate and union bribery in government as well.

battler
Dec 30, 2011 at 7:19 a.m.
Suggest removal

I say we pass a bill that would void an entire petition if it has one invalid signiture. My guess is that they would be left with none.

Oreally
Dec 30, 2011 at 6:33 a.m.
Suggest removal

What a joke! They've got it bass-ackwards. Voters are the ones who are willing to pay in order to sign. LOL. The money is flowing the other way. Make a law against that!!

oldvet
Dec 30, 2011 at 6:28 a.m.
Suggest removal

An out of state union was reported to have provided Thousands of dollars for recall Walker signatures.

carlitosway
Dec 30, 2011 at 4:40 a.m.
Suggest removal

I don't think you have to worry about anyone paying for signatures as they will have enough free ones. Unlike buying drinks to recall Democrats in bars. Recall Walker

kiowamohican
Dec 30, 2011 at 2:13 a.m.
Suggest removal

I have ZERO problem what so ever with ANY side paying for a signature, and or vote! Considering these idiots FLOOD the air waves with ads, wasting millions, to sway a very small %age of 'undecideds', I don't have any problem, just giving $$ directly to someone, and literally buy their vote. I ran the numbers 9and posted it on a GAZ thread) in that WI supreme court race we had, and it came out to something like $450 was spent per undecided vote! Like I said, just cut me a check for $450...The $$$ is ALL READY corrupting politics to an unheard of degree..Might as well, just let votes be bought straight out at this point. Pretty sad when millions are being spent to trick some chump, who knows nothing about the corruption of politics, to vote for them. Might as well just give the person the $$$, and not go through the elaborate ruse.

rqcrqc
Dec 30, 2011 at 12:33 a.m.
Suggest removal

"It happens on both sides of the aisle," Wynn said.

Well, no, actually, it doesn't. It happened on your side of the aisle when a right-wing bartender offered free shots of liquor to drunken women if they would sign a petition to recall a Democratic State Senator. That's documented. If you can identify someone on the other "side" who has done something similar, go ahead. But you can't.

rqcrqc
Dec 30, 2011 at 12:02 a.m.
Suggest removal

Democrats offered an amendment to the Republican Voter ID bill last summer which would have made it illegal to offer anything of value in exchange for recall petition signatures. All the Republicans voted against it (and all the other Democratic amendments).

mistergee1
Dec 29, 2011 at 11:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

nobody jumps into the street and I didn't get paid for mine or my wife or my friends who signed. we're all just as broke as we have been.lol

fearandrhetoric4dummies
Dec 29, 2011 at 11:05 p.m.
Suggest removal

Evan Wynn DOES NOTHING for his constituents and is simply a rubber stamp for Scott Walker's agenda. I have tried to contact his office on several occaisions and have gotten 2 generic form letters in return. Thanks for nothing Wynn, time for you to go, you and Loudenbeck.

wleong
Dec 29, 2011 at 10:37 p.m.
Suggest removal

Representative Andy Jorgensen will replace Evan Wynn in the 43rd! Andy has "earned" my vote....Wynn had his chance to help ALL in the 43rd....but missed the bus by ignoring his constituents!

jtp5
Dec 29, 2011 at 10:06 p.m.
Suggest removal

I for one am collecting recall signatures and have not heard of this until Wynn has brought it up. What an idiot, people have had enough of Walker, in a vary short time. Maybe we can put Wynn out in the street in the next election.

poobah
Dec 29, 2011 at 9:47 p.m.
Suggest removal

donnaw said, "poobah...you mean like Obama receiving campaign funds from the receipients of the green energy stimulus monies? Google Obama campaign donors--interesting article in the Daily Beast."
-
Yes, I do, donnaw. I mean all money and all politicians, Democrat and Republican and any other stripe. All of them. That's why I suggested the law. I would like to see a prohibition on all private money in politics. Period.

BostonBill
Dec 29, 2011 at 8:55 p.m.
Suggest removal

These are the acts of desperate people.

helge1939
Dec 29, 2011 at 8:46 p.m.
Suggest removal

This guy is just showing us anther reason why those rep. & dem. should only be geting paid part time or less
They are not needed full time A real wast of tax money

helge1939
Dec 29, 2011 at 8:41 p.m.
Suggest removal

No one had to pay me to sign & I do not know of any that signed who would want to be payed to sign their all more then glad to sign the RECALL

donnaw
Dec 29, 2011 at 8:37 p.m.
Suggest removal

poobah...you mean like Obama receiving campaign funds from the receipients of the green energy stimulus monies? Google Obama campaign donors--interesting article in the Daily Beast.

MooShoo
Dec 29, 2011 at 7:42 p.m.
Suggest removal

Evan says "When they wrote the bribery statute, people honestly never thought about recalls."
*
Evan, what would you call the loophole that allows $250,000 out-of-state CONTRIBUTIONS to Governor Walker? If you can't think of anything, I have a top ten list:
*
1. Political prostitution on steriods.
2. Loopholepalooza BABY!!!
3. Pay for play.
4. Exactly what it looks and smells like.
5. You get what you pay for.
6. Tribute to Caesar.
7. The Governor's office is a wholly owned subsidiary of (fill in the blank).
8. Incumbent stimulus.
9. Recall lube job.
10. And my favorite: legal bribery.

Feduptaxpayer
Dec 29, 2011 at 7:38 p.m.
Suggest removal

janesvillian - if it is so easy, why is that all the ones that I have driven by are alone almost jumping out into traffic to get you to see their silly little signs.

Gandalf
Dec 29, 2011 at 7:35 p.m.
Suggest removal

Rep. Wynn is making a fool out of himself, first by believing the outrageous heresay about a $10 payment to sign the petition, then secondly by proposing legislation to outlaw such an act. What a waste of taxpayer resources! This is another Republican joke of a solution in search of a problem.

youkillme
Dec 29, 2011 at 7:28 p.m.
Suggest removal

Look how easy and quick these legislators can slap a law together to stop somebody from paying ten bucks for a signature, but they can't stop the thousands even millions pouring into their campaigns? By no means would we want to restore public confidence in the legislative system.

packolies
Dec 29, 2011 at 6:42 p.m.
Suggest removal

if they can pay off a politician with a political lobby then what is the difference? How about passing a law against buying there votes..

poobah
Dec 29, 2011 at 6 p.m.
Suggest removal

Maybe Rep. Evan Wynn would also be interested in sponsoring a bill that would make it a felony for elected officials to receive campaign money and then vote for legislation that favors the donor.

janesvillean
Dec 29, 2011 at 5:41 p.m.
Suggest removal

I'm calling bullhockey on that story. Ten bucks for a signature? Twenty says there are no witnesses willing to come forward with a deposition. Where's the money supposed to have come from? Any recall petitioner types flush with cash from their privately owned businesses? It's actually really, incredibly easy to get people to sign the petitions against Walker -- you just have to mention his name.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT