$1.5 million land buy OK'd

By JIM LEUTE ( Contact )   Friday, Dec. 23, 2011
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Photo

— With a land acquisition out of the way, the city of Janesville will now focus on drafting an agreement that could bring a medical isotope manufacturer and 100 or so high-paying jobs to Janesville.

At a special meeting Thursday, the city council voted 5-1 to spend just more than $1.5 million to buy an 84-acre parcel on Highway 51 south of the city.

The city's option on the land expires Dec. 31.

The council earlier this month authorized the purchase if there was a signed development agreement between the city and SHINE Medical Technologies.

If the two sides reach an agreement, it's unlikely to happen before the end of the year. Thursday's action allows the city to buy the land without any conditions, meaning that if a deal with SHINE falls through, the city will own the property.

A startup company now based in Middleton, SHINE plans to produce molybdenum-99, an isotope needed for detecting heart disease and staging cancer. Mo-99, as it is called, decays to produce technetium-99m, which is used in approximately 50,000 nuclear medicine procedures each day in the United States. The U.S. now depends on other countries for its supply of Mo-99.

In Rock County, SHINE could join another medical isotope maker, NorthStar Medical Radioisotopes, which plans to build a $194 million plant in Beloit and create more than 150 jobs by 2016.

SHINE and Northstar are two of just four U.S. companies supported by the National Nuclear Security Administration as it pushes for a more reliable and diverse supply of Mo-99.

While SHINE and Northstar are start-up companies, the other two are not. Both Babcock & Wilcox Co. and GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy are well-established companies that are major players in the world of nuclear reactors and services.

SHINE CEO Greg Piefer said his company is particularly interested in the 84-acre lot the city will buy because it is across Highway 51 from the Southern Wisconsin Regional Airport. Piefer said the airport would be used for up to 10 air shipments a week of Mo-99.

He said the company also likes the parcel's proximity to Blackhawk Technical College, from which he expects to get many of the production workers who would earn $50,000 to $60,000 per year.

The 84-acre parcel also would make SHINE or some other company eligible for a U.S. Department of Agriculture loan guarantee. Piefer said that is critical for his start-up company, which hopes to go into production in late 2014 or early 2015. That option doesn't exist in the city's neighboring 224-acre site.

SHINE also is considering Stevens Point and Chippewa Falls for its $80 million production facility. Janesville, he said, has an edge because it is nearer to Madison and the intellectual property generated on the UW-Madison campus.

"I'm obviously super happy with the council's decision," Piefer said Thursday. "It's all I can hope for at this point, and I think that by doing this, the council believes we can get the deal done.

"We're most of the way through the development agreement, and I think this is an endorsement that means we can get it done."

City Manager Eric Levitt said the city would continue to work with SHINE on the agreement, which is expected to include tax increment financing and other incentives tied to company benchmarks.

Levitt said the city would close on the land in February. He and other city officials have said that if the SHINE deal falls through, the 84-acre parcel would be a prime location for other businesses.

Economic Development Director Vic Grassman said $18,000 per acre is not out of line with other recent sales of agriculture land developed for other uses. In fact, he said, the going rate near urban corridors appears to be about $25,000 per acre.

Before the vote, resident K. Andreah Briarmoon told council members that the price was too high. She said that if the council really has $1.5 million to spend, it would be better targeted to the general welfare of a community that has suffered economically.

Levitt noted that the money to buy the land will come from TIF accounts and not the city's general fund and that companies locating in the TIF district pay development costs back through property taxes.

In the case of SHINE, the property taxes would be significant, as the $25 million facility would—according to a state Supreme Court ruling—be taxed at its construction cost because there are no comparable facilities in the area.

For SHINE, annual property taxes of more than $600,000 would be used over a period of time, typically 10 years, to pay the city back for it land acquisition and development costs.

Councilman Tom McDonald cast the lone dissenting vote on the land acquisition. He did so because of two concerns.

One is financial, he said, but because the development agreement with SHINE is still under negotiation, he can't discuss it publicly.

The other, he said, is adding to the city's extensive inventory of land for economic development while depleting valuable agricultural land.

"Economic development is important, but so is farmland and natural resources," he said after the meeting. "The question becomes economic development at what costs to the future?"

Representing the public-private Rock County 5.0 economic development initiative, Mary Willmer-Sheedy cheered the city decision's to buy the land.

"SHINE is a priority right now for the city," she said. "There are multiple businesses that Rock County 5.0 is working with.

"If the SHINE deal for some reason or another does not go through, it still gives us an incredible piece of land we can use for other projects."

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(15)
jcommon
Dec 30, 2011 at 2:14 p.m.
Suggest removal

"how do they bring companies to Janesville"

Why not start by making the city attractive for a good workforce. Keep taxes low, both corporate and property taxes.

dkush21
Dec 28, 2011 at 3:32 p.m.
Suggest removal

I'll believe it when I see it! In the meantime, My taxes will most likely be going up to pay for this. Isn't there a saying "don't count your chickens before their hatched"? You think that the city of Janesville would make sure that these good paying jobs will be created before buying the land. But then again, when has the city ever made sure of anything before they threw taxpayer money into anything. The road for GM comes to mind. The millions of dollars for the schools just before we lost so many jobs. Which train was it, Amtrac, going to Chicago? And the list goes on.

gonfo5
Dec 27, 2011 at 2:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

Let me ask this qeustion: So if the City of Janesville doesn't offer incentives to companies to move to their city, then how do they bring companies to Janesville? I know how the rest of the world does it but if you are so against incentives then surely you have a much better plan that you are willing to share with the rest of us. So how should the city of Janesville or any city for that matter entice companies to move to their city?

SuperDave
Dec 25, 2011 at 7:19 a.m.
Suggest removal

The city should not be making "deals" with private business. Just another example of micro-managing and crony Capitalism. What? You thought this was an arm's-length transaction? HAhahhahahaha.

Zoom
Dec 25, 2011 at 12:28 a.m.
Suggest removal

I would think the City of Janesville could lease the farmland if the deal falls through.

I would like to have more financial details of the deal, but gaining a high tech company with solid middle class jobs would be good news.

janesvillean
Dec 24, 2011 at 11:44 a.m.
Suggest removal

partarican1, here is more about the SHINE process. It does not use a nuclear reactor.
http://www.wisconsinengineer.com/article...

partarican1
Dec 24, 2011 at 10:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

janesvillean-it comes from a nuclear reactor...laboratory proven or not...

jv93
Dec 24, 2011 at 12:25 a.m.
Suggest removal

Kinda like buying and rehabbing houses?

chelleandlou
Dec 24, 2011 at 12:15 a.m.
Suggest removal

So if the city fails to land this company then it has 84 acres of land the taxpayers have to pay for and no jobs to pay for it. Smart..real smart.

youkillme
Dec 23, 2011 at 8:18 p.m.
Suggest removal

janesvillean, I understand your point but I don't want down payment assistance or a loan I have to pay back because my taxes and my spending will be the payback. Because I guarantee to pay my bills to the utilities, local grocery stores and property taxes, the least the city can do to show good faith is give me stuff for free. That I promise to add several hundred dollars a week in economic activity would be the forgivable part of the loan. The more success I have the less I have to pay back. I'm just trying to reframe this deal for a typical homeowner and wonder what it would be like if everyone got the same deal.

janesvillean
Dec 23, 2011 at 7:29 p.m.
Suggest removal

partarican1, the SHINE process is different.
http://www.shinemed.com/investors.php
.
youkillme, the city does in fact have various housing assistance programs including down payment assistance.
http://www.ci.janesville.wi.us/index.asp...
.
I must admit I am surprised the USDA will subsidize farmland development, though.

partarican1
Dec 23, 2011 at 6:28 p.m.
Suggest removal

no one notices a nuclear reactor needed to produce the Mb-99?

why is no one outraged by this?

DeGryse
Dec 23, 2011 at 5:29 p.m.
Suggest removal

In Janesville?? If you never thought that your elected officials were thinking of nobody but themselves, you had better think so now.

youkillme
Dec 23, 2011 at 5:06 p.m.
Suggest removal

Why should I get a mortgage for a house when the city will buy a house for me to live and I can pay back the money through my property taxes. Plus, look at all the jobs I would support shopping at local stores and buying services. Where can I apply for this deal? Yet, who would have thought that our government would promote and pay for the destruction of agricultural farmland with a U.S. Department of Agriculture loan guarantee? This is a new low point for Janesville's future.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT