GM CEO gets $2.5M pay package for 2010
Photo
DETROIT General Motors made a remarkable comeback in 2010. But its new CEO took the job too late in the year to profit as much as other top executives.
GM gave Chief Executive and Chairman Dan Akerson a 2010 pay package valued at just over $2.5 million. The compensation was announced in a regulatory filing on Thursday.
The amount was far less than his predecessor and other executives at the company. But Akerson only worked the final four months of the year, and the government limits what GM can pay executives because it took bailout money in 2009.
Still, Akerson assumed the job as GM was finishing up an impressive year with a flurry of successes. GM turned its first annual profit in years, returned as a publicly traded company, and increased U.S. sales of cars and trucks.
That success proved more profitable for Akerson's predecessor, Ed Whitacre, 69, who received compensation valued at $5 million last year. Whitacre was CEO for just eight months in 2010, leaving Sept. 1. The company's board had decided it wanted a leader who would stay on longer than Whitacre was willing.
Akerson, 62, had joined GM as a board member in 2009. He took over the CEO job from Whitacre and added the chairman's title at the start of this year. For his work in 2010, he received a salary of $566,667, stock awards valued at $1.77 million and other compensation of $194,088.
Former Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer Chris Liddell was GM's highest-paid executive last year with a package worth $6.2 million. He left the company April 1 after being passed over when Akerson replaced Whitacre.
For the full year of 2011, Akerson's pay package will be larger. GM has said that he will get salary and stock worth $9 million annually.
Still, that's dwarfed by the $26.5 million received by Alan Mulally, CEO of Ford Motor Co., which did not take government bailout money and isn't restricted in what it can pay executives.
The U.S. government has restricted the amount of cash GM can pay its top 25 executives because the company still hasn't fully repaid its bailout. The government has said cash payouts can't be increased this year, but the companies are being allowed to boost deferred stock awards to their executives.
GM pulled off a remarkable turnaround in 2010 after emerging from bankruptcy protection the year before. It went from losing more than $80 billion in the five years before its bankruptcy and needing a government bailout to earning $4.7 billion in 2010. It also became a publically traded stock again in November and increased U.S. sales by 7.2 percent last year.
Whitacre is credited with firing ineffective managers and speeding up decisions at the company.
Akerson is pushing to have GM's cars, such as the Chevrolet Malibu sedan, overhauled faster to keep them fresh and appealing to buyers.
Akerson's other compensation for 2010 included $153,000 in pay for serving a full year on the board, as well as $13,000 in relocation expenses, $6,740 for security and just over $10,000 for company vehicles.
Much of the GM's turnaround stems from the company's ability to shed massive debts in bankruptcy, and the $50 billion rescue package the U.S. government gave the Detroit automaker, which was bleeding cash and headed toward collapse in early 2009.
The Associated Press formula calculates an executive's total compensation during the last fiscal year by adding salary, bonuses, perks, above-market interest the company pays on deferred compensation and the estimated value of stock and stock options awarded during the year. The AP formula does not count changes in the present value of pension benefits. That makes the AP total slightly different in most cases from the total reported by companies to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The value that a company assigned to an executive's stock and option awards for 2010 was the present value of what the company expected the awards to be worth to the executive over time. Companies use one of several formulas to calculate that value. However, the number is just an estimate, and what an executive ultimately receives will depend on the performance of the company's stock in the years after the awards are granted. Most stock compensation programs require an executive to wait a specified amount of time to receive shares or exercise options.

Apr 25, 2011 at 3:13 p.m.
Suggest removal
But the lugnuts who posted on the blog about Ryan Braun signing a $105 million contract extension said that was okay! A baseball player who plays a game, is responsible for nobody but himself and his own success, is judged to be more valuable than a man who runs a billion dollar corporation employing thousands and responsible for turning out profitable products each year? Comparing the two contributions to our society, I don't think $ 2.5 million is over the top.
Apr 25, 2011 at 7:10 a.m.
Suggest removal
This CEO is one of the highest paid with taxpayer money.
Apr 24, 2011 at 12:25 p.m.
Suggest removal
Actually Bush gave $13.4 billion after Congress did not act on it, they never voted. This was the first loan that eventually became $50 billion in total loans.
Apr 24, 2011 at 11:38 a.m.
Suggest removal
Congress voted against a bailout. President Bush made the decision of circumventing Congress and divered $15.4 billion from the Trouble Asset Relief Program funds to GM in Dec of 2008. Not Obama. BTW, now the the executives get to pay less taxes because their pay is in stock, which is taxed at the capital gains tax rate not earned income rate.
Apr 24, 2011 at 10:52 a.m.
Suggest removal
just ask these overpaid ceo types.. they are after all the only ones that can run companies into the ground and still claim they deserve huge pay with a christmas bonus.
Apr 24, 2011 at 10:37 a.m.
Suggest removal
Rocky
Apr 22, 2011 at 8:42 p.m.
Suggest removal Pubsrus - go back to the pub. That was 70 years ago. Build a bridge and get over it.
Will you say the same thing about 9/11??? If weren't for a company like GM you would probably be speaking Japanese or German or worse you may have never been born. You need to read a little history before you speak.
Apr 24, 2011 at 7:20 a.m.
Suggest removal
See how all you lemmings got away from the topic of the story and my first post? You no longer care about the gross amount of money the CEO made compared to what the blue collar slug on the line makes. Its way out of wack. Corporate America runs this country and all you dolts are oblivious to it. Hell, you're doing the fighting for them. And they're in board rooms, yachts, bank vaults just yucking it up. Lemmings. Thats what you all are. Lemmings
Apr 23, 2011 at 11:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
They never mention the real chairman and CEO of GM...Barack Obama. Maybe it's because he doesn't really need the 2.5 million. I'm sure the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac fund he walked away with is treating him well.
Apr 23, 2011 at 11:24 p.m.
Suggest removal
btw, just see if your government will pony up the cash to help you with your bankruptcy. They'll fall all over themselves to help a dinosaur of a car manufacturer that probably should have died. If your corporate culture is so out of touch with reality that you couldn't see the massive corner you've painted yourself in, then you have no right to be in business. (but it's the unions that ruined GM...lol.)
Apr 23, 2011 at 11:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
They repaid the loan with the same money they got bailed out with. In fact, they reported negative cash flow in 2010. If you want to paint it as "it was GM's money to do with what they please", then go ahead. It doesn't change the fact the the repaid the loan with government money, not with profits from a company that was healthy or profitable. If moving figures from column A to column B makes them square in the "books", then I have some swamp land for you to take a look at.
Apr 23, 2011 at 10:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
politifact.com, "So the loan portion of the GM bailout was, in fact, settled with interest, five years ahead of schedule."
Apr 23, 2011 at 10:48 p.m.
Suggest removal
The bailout money bought about 60% of the company. It was GM`s money to use as they saw fit. They repaid all the loans. The only government money on the books is for the remaining stake in the company, about 31%.
Apr 23, 2011 at 10:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
"In an April 21, 2010, interview on the Fox Business Network, GM's vice chairman, Stephen Girsky, was asked if GM is just paying the government back with government money.
"That is, in effect true," Girsky said. "But a year ago, nobody thought we'd be able to pay this back. They gave us five years to pay it back, we're paying it back in nine months. ... This is one step along the way in the road to recovery here.''
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/...
Apr 23, 2011 at 10:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
GM repaid the "TARP" loan with TARP money that was escrowed, not by profits made by the company. So, essentially, they repaid their bailout cash with bailout cash. How is that "repaying the loan"?
Apr 23, 2011 at 10:23 p.m.
Suggest removal
Mrs. Obama does have 22 assistants, at a cost of$1.6 million, not $100,000 each. Mrs. Bush had 18 at a cost of $1.4 million, a higher pay scale. At one point Mrs. Bush had 24 assistants. This is from factcheck.org.
GM has paid all their loans, the only government money they have is from the purchase of 31% of the stock the U.S. still owns. They owe nothing but gratitude, which was already expressed by the former chairman.
About 20% of federal employees make $100,000, or more. Obama froze salaries, he did not restrict them.
Apr 23, 2011 at 10:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
earnednotgiven wrote..."no government employee is suppose to make over 100,000. REMEMEBER?? But Michelle Obama broke that rule when she has 22 personal assistance that make over 100,000 each. Did you know that?"
Please cite your source.
Apr 22, 2011 at 10:13 p.m.
Suggest removal
OMG get over it, it amazes me how many people think that the definition of American Made doesnt include made and China and assembled in USA, that way the company can say made in America as that was the last place that the part was added. And as far as Michelle Obama, all the more power to her, and any women who says that she wouldnt do the same if given the chance wouldnt do it well then I am not sure if you should be commenting on here, cause only honest people can comment on here with true statements that everyone will agree too..
Apr 22, 2011 at 9:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
harleedude and others: When are you all going to understand that there is no 100% American made car. Go to:http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2007-03-21-car-content-chart_N.htm or google : Where American cars are made and you will see that there are no 100% cars made in America. I get so tired of people telling me that my Hyndai Santa Fe only supports the Koreans. My car was built in Westport GA by Americans, not Canadians or Mexicans. It has an American engine and transmission which is more than I can say about some GM cars that are made in Canada or Mexico. Do you think those people send the money back to America to spend here? The people who built my car lives in American and spent their paycheck on rent, food, etc HERE in America. Get over it. It is a global market and there are no American made cars 100% anymore. We need to add a tariff on imported products, just like they charge us. That will stop all the products from China, Korea, etc. from coming in here. Lets get smart.
Apr 22, 2011 at 8:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
Pubsrus - go back to the pub. That was 70 years ago. Build a bridge and get over it.
Apr 22, 2011 at 7:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
Hmmm. He must belong to a union.
Apr 22, 2011 at 4:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
earnednotgiven; Thank you!
Apr 22, 2011 at 2 p.m.
Suggest removal
I've purchased 2 new vehicles from Fagan and love my GM vehicles but I don't know if I'll ever be able to buy from that company again. Ed Whitaker lied to my face about paying back the loans etc... I think it'll be Fords from now on.
Apr 22, 2011 at 1:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
Well said Pubsrus! I couldn't agree more. Why would you want to buy a car from a country that was trying to kill your ancestors in WWII? Why would you not support Americans and American companies first? How soon some forget.
Apr 22, 2011 at 12:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
Actually NOBAMA2012 GM HASN'T paid back all the money they owe the US. They took their second installment and used it to pay the first installment back.So they stole from Paul to pay Peter. Basic Math, GM still owes the full amount because they never paid it 100% in full. AND GM shouldn't be giving any EXECUTIVE over 100,000 due to the US Government owns 40% of them and no government employee is suppose to make over 100,000. REMEMEBER?? But Michelle Obama broke that rule when she has 22 personal assistance that make over 100,000 each. Did you know that?
Apr 22, 2011 at 11:59 a.m.
Suggest removal
I will never buy another GM car ! We taxpayers bailed their butts out and they came out smelling like roses while we got it put where the sun doesn't shine !!!!
With all these high priced ceos, ballplayers and so, It will come to an end. If you watch Nascar and some of these spring baseball games the seats are MT. We can not afford to go ! I used to go to races and back then you couldn't find a seat because it was sold out but when you end up spending 1.500 in a weekend I had to quit going !
Family came 1st !!!
Apr 22, 2011 at 11:55 a.m.
Suggest removal
GM has repaid the loans they recieved from both the US and Canadian governments BOND. Nice try though.
Apr 22, 2011 at 11:46 a.m.
Suggest removal
Do you think he will take out a full page ad in the papers or pay for a thirty second spot on tv to thank the TAXPAYERS for his salary, even though Government Motors still owes the taxpayers money!
Apr 22, 2011 at 11:35 a.m.
Suggest removal
1942, Production Goes to War
General Motors converted all of its production to the Allied war effort and delivered more than $12 billion worth of goods, ranging from airplanes to tanks, marine diesel engines, trucks, machine guns, and shells. No other manufacturer delivered as much material to the Allied forces.
Additional Information: Here is a list of the WWII General Motors War Material Production 1940-45: (This is the best list I could assemble from the contemporary sources at war's end)
198,000 Diesel engines for tanks & landing craft
206,000 Airplane engines
13,000 Complete bombers and fighter planes
97,000 Aircraft propellors
301,000 Aircraft gyroscopes
38,000 Tanks, tank destroyers and armored vehicles
854,000 Trucks, including amhibious DUKWs
190,000 Cannons
1,900,000 Machine guns and submachine guns
3,142,000 Carbines
3,826,000 Electric motors
11,111,000 Fuses
360,000,000 Ball and roller bearings
119,562,000 Shells
39,181,000 Cartridge cases
540,619,000 Grand Total
That's it trash GM. You go ahead and buy your vehicles from those who tried to kill us and I will buy mine from the one who protected us. GOD BLESS GM!!!!! To this day, the government has not forgotten GM's contribution.
Apr 22, 2011 at 10:50 a.m.
Suggest removal
I will try to explain something to bella and the rest who keep thinking the wrong stuff about the collective bargaining bill.
It doesn't have anything to do with the salaries of the teachers. Look farther than just how the teachers will be effected. Collective bargaining deals with the teacher's benefits.
I say end the collective bargaining and give the teachers their retirement contribution to them in wages and let them do with it what they want. You realize, the so-called wealthy love the fact that State Taxes get automatically put into retirement for the teachers. Where do you think that "retirement" money actually goes?
Stocks, Wall Street, Bankers, Investors...automatically for them to do with what they want. All the while, they convince every middle class American, teachers included, that this is a good thing, investment with them is good, so they can give CEO's of these companies, millions.
Teachers, don't let them take your money automatically every paycheck, you should decide where your money is going, and that should be into your pocket.
Apr 22, 2011 at 10:43 a.m.
Suggest removal
What really causes all this is the majority of this country is populated by 5-year-old minds.
Apr 22, 2011 at 10:39 a.m.
Suggest removal
oops, I was redundant, you already said that stuff.
Apr 22, 2011 at 10:38 a.m.
Suggest removal
wi55lady- I like your post,but the real reason all of those people get paid that much is the multitude of American suckers paying the bill for all that stuff.....If there weren't millions of ppl who would pay to watch others kick a silly ball around, they wouldn't get paid anything to do it..etc...etc.
Apr 22, 2011 at 10:12 a.m.
Suggest removal
Aaaah..... garyprimer, it isn't just the GM execs that make an obsene amount of money versus the minions below them. I's ALL of corporate America. And the lemmings out there are too blind, or stupid to see it. Bella nailed it also.
Apr 22, 2011 at 9:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
But let's all focus on those horrible teachers' unions and their salaries....we are a nation of suckers. We play right into it every time.
Apr 22, 2011 at 9:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
The money is obscene. 40 teachers could be employed with his pay.
Apr 22, 2011 at 8:49 a.m.
Suggest removal
NOBODY IS WORTH THAT MUCH MONEY!! I don't care if you're a CEO, a professional athlete, a Hollyweird bozo or politican. Anyone making a million+ dollars a year is narcissistic!! Most people are lucky to make $30,000 a year. Unfortunately, Americans are stupid. If we would stop buying the company's products (which aren't entirely USA made) or stop going to games and movies, these self-absorbed jerks would think twice about their almighty paycheck. Case in point: Did you see how much Braun is going to make on just the salary extension??!! GOOD GRIEF!!! It's time to boycott ALL sports games!!! AND...look what Jolly did with his megabucks paycheck!! ENOUGH SAID!!!
Apr 22, 2011 at 8:21 a.m.
Suggest removal
ex-assembly line.
Apr 22, 2011 at 8:18 a.m.
Suggest removal
What assembly line?
Apr 22, 2011 at 8:05 a.m.
Suggest removal
Yeah,
Its those damn line workers.
spt, you do realize this guy makes about 100 times as much as your friends and neighbors that work on that assembly line?
Apr 22, 2011 at 7:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
I guess that the more things change, the more they remain the same.
After the US government unloads it's stock at a considerable loss to the taxpayers, GM is going to head right down the toilet again.
Big Dan will hop in his private jet and fly to Washington looking for more public assistance.
Apr 22, 2011 at 6:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
Who cares about that. And it was only for 4 months work. Why don't we get to the real reason cars cost so much-them damn no good line workers make way too much an hour. Sheesh, and for what they do, that is the real story.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.