Would I-90 expansion increase safety, economic development?

By JIM LEUTE ( Contact )   Sunday, Sept. 5, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

PhotoVideo


Traffic heads north on Interstate 90 as seen from the Racine St. bridge on Friday.

Traffic heads north on Interstate 90 as seen from the Racine St. bridge on Friday.

PhotoVideo

Reader pollAudio

Do you believe expanding I-90 to six lanes will bring jobs to Janesville?

  

See the results and comments

Reader pollAudio

Should an I-90 interchange be constructed at County M, west of Milton?

  

See the results and comments

— Expanding Interstate 90/39 to six lanes between the state line and Madison would make the route safer and spur economic development and tourism, proponents of the idea say.

State crash data give some support to the safety argument, but evidence for economic stimulation that six lanes might bring is primarily anecdotal.

Discussed for decades, the project picked up steam earlier this year when Forward Janesville formed the I-39/90 Coalition to push the expansion at state and federal levels.

Into the passing lane?

The group scored a coup last month when it convinced Gov. Jim Doyle to convene the Transportation Projects Commission, the powerful state committee that recommends major highway projects to the Legislature. With state and federal funding tied up in several state projects—most notably the Marquette Interchange in Milwaukee—the group hasn’t met in the eight years Doyle has been in office.

But as projects have been completed, time and funding have become available.

Commission approval, which could come by December, would carry significant weight with the Legislature as it sets its 2011-13 budget.

Assembly Speaker Mike Sheridan, D-Janesville, is optimistic the commission will recommend the expansion that’s expected to cost more than $1 billion. Half of the project’s cost would come from state borrowing. The remainder would be split between the state’s transportation fund and the federal government.

Sheridan has reason for optimism—at least right now—as friendly Democrats control the Senate, Assembly and governor’s office. As Assembly speaker, Sheridan appoints Assembly Democrats to the Transportation Projects Commission.

The 14-member commission is chaired by the governor and has five members from each house, including three from the majority party in both and two each from the minority party. It also includes three citizen members.

In appointing Assembly Democrats, Sheridan has done his homework on the expansion project.

He’s appointed himself, Fred Clark of Baraboo and John Steinbrink of Pleasant Prairie.

“I’m putting people on there that will do the right thing,” Sheridan said. “I’m optimistic that the make-up will be such that project will get support.”

Doyle administration officials have said the commission will meet sometime between Sept. 15 and Dec. 15. Its decisions need confirmation by the new governor and Legislature as part of the next state budget.

The commission can recommend only projects that could start within five years. In the state budget approved last year, lawmakers set funding levels that would open a spot on the road construction schedule for the project in 2015 or 2016.

Even if the commission doesn’t recommend the I-90/39 expansion, Sheridan said the project still could be put to the Legislature as a separate bill.

“The commission is only one hurdle, then we’ve got to get it through the Legislature,” he said. “In the past, it’s really depended a lot on elections and who is in charge to get a project enumerated.”

The Gazette asked the three main gubernatorial candidates whether they support the I-90/39 expansion.

Democrat Tom Barrett said the corridor must be kept strong. A commission evaluation unfettered by politics is an important step, he said.

Republican Scott Walker said he supports the expansion, while Republican Mark Neumann had an ambiguous response. The state’s infrastructure is in disrepair, Neumann said, but a vital transportation system must be balanced with state budget issues.

A safer stretch?

If reading about a rash of I-90/39 accidents wasn’t enough to convince Sheridan that the Interstate between the state line and Madison was a safety hazard, a recent ride with the Wisconsin State Patrol did.

“It’s a mess out there,” said Sheridan, who rode with a trooper on a recent Sunday.

Sheridan said that during peak travel times, troopers are hesitant to pull over people as long as traffic is moving safely.

But during Sheridan’s ride, the trooper couldn’t ignore a truck pulling a trailer.

“It was weaving in and out of traffic, two kids in the back end,” Sheridan said. “We pulled it over and within two minutes both sides of the Interstate were jammed up.

“There’s just too much traffic on that two-lane stretch, and there are too many people getting killed out there.”

Over the last 30 years, statistics from the state’s Department of Transportation seem to support that contention.

Average annual daily traffic counts at Newville were 18,600 in 1975. By 2000, the number had increased to 45,000 vehicles. By 2030, 87,600 cars and trucks are expected to register at the site.

Recently, however, traffic counts along the entire stretch from the state line to the Beltline have decreased in what officials said is short-term reflection of a depressed economy and higher gas prices.

DOT studies also show that the 45-mile segment built in the late 1950s doesn’t meet safety standards for roadways, bridges and interchanges.

In terms of traffic counts and crash rates, a comparison of one Interstate segment to another is difficult because it’s subject to so many variables.

But at the Gazette’s request, the DOT generated traffic counts and crash rates for the route between the state line and just south of the Beltline in Madison. It did the same for the 30-mile stretch from a mile north of East Washington Avenue in Madison to one mile south of the Highway 78/I-39 split.

The section north of Madison is a six-lane Interstate, and—for trivia buffs—it is the longest stretch of three concurrent interstates (90/94/39) in the United States.

From 2005 to 2009, the crash rate for the two-lane section south of Madison was nearly 35 percent higher than the three-lane northern stretch, according to DOT numbers. Broken down further, the fatality rate for the southern section was slightly better, but the injury rate was nearly 45 percent higher than the northern section.

In its analysis, the DOT did not include crashes on the urbanized Madison stretch or accidents with deer. Construction zones weren’t factored in, but crashes that occurred within 1,000 feet of an interchange were included.

The DOT calculates crash rates per 100 million miles traveled. That allows comparisons despite differences in traffic volume and segment lengths.

For the southern section, the overall crash rate was 67.9. For the northern three-lane, it was 50.3.

Calculated for a five-year period, albeit one year earlier, the statewide average crash rate for rural Interstates was 65.2.

That begs questions: Does an expansion from two lanes in each direction to three lanes guarantee a safer Interstate? Would an expansion of the southern segment reduce its average of 608 crashes a year to 395 annually, the rate calculated for the northern segment?

The answers aren’t so simple, and there are no guarantees. But on its face, it seems that alleviating congestion, particularly as traffic counts are expected to increase, makes for a safer road.

“You can draw a conclusion that there’s not as much congestion on the northern segment,” said Jeff Berens, traffic safety engineer for the DOT’s southwest region that includes both segments.

“I believe there are some capacity issues down on that southern stretch, and when you start to have capacity issues, you start to see people become more impatient in their driving.”

Berens said the state can design and build the safest of roads, but it can’t control motorist behavior.

“There’s no question that we’ve seen a significant increase in volume in the last decade,” said Lt. Brad Altman, executive officer of state patrol’s southwest region. “Whenever you have an increase in volume, the opportunities for mishaps increase.

“…Three lanes certainly alleviates congestion because there’s more room to spread out that volume.”

Will they come?

Whether it’s four lanes or six lanes between Madison and the state line, projections indicate traffic volume will increase dramatically in coming years.

The efficient flow of the motorists and the tourism dollars or products they carry is a primary reason for the expansion, according to the coalition advancing the project.

“The safety issue is certainly what grabs people’s attention, but there’s a huge economic development component to this as well,” said Dan Cunningham, Forward Janesville’s vice president of government relations.

“And it’s not just for the Janesville area. It’s for the state for which we are a major Interstate gateway.”

Cunningham said an expansion would make the Interstate six lanes from Chicago to central Wisconsin, eliminating the local four-lane stretch that creates a bottleneck from both directions, he said

Between $650 million and $800 million worth of products travel along the corridor each day, he said, citing numbers generated by The National Center for Freight & Infrastructure Research & Education at UW-Madison.

“This stuff isn’t just staying on the Interstate,” he said. “It’s branching off in all directions around the state.”

That makes a local expansion attractive for companies doing all that producing and shipping, he said.

As evidence, he points to the economic development that has occurred along the three-lane expansions in northern Illinois.

“Granted, the evidence on economic development is anecdotal,” he said. “But we see it and hear it from site development people all the time.”

Sheridan agrees.

“It is anecdotal,” he said. “But what we do know for sure is that if we don’t do it, we won’t be able to compete.

“Companies that are looking to expand and relocate are companies that are looking for a good infrastructure.”

In addition to spurring long-term economic growth, the expansion would provide jobs in the short term, Sheridan said.

He said the project would be responsible for 8,900 jobs, nearly half of which would be in the construction of the new highway. About 1,900 jobs are estimated in the construction supply industries, while another 2,500 are ancillary jobs along the corridor such as retail stores, motels and restaurants, he said.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(24)
Sigma40
Sep 7, 2010 at 6:30 a.m.
Suggest removal

Ya I agree the walmart entrance on 26 is a pain when you're trying swap lanes with people coming off the hwy. Then again people in charge or designing stuff lately are horrible. They cant even design parking lots. Look at Woodmans now... the Mall after a couple years ago.

scoobydo
Sep 7, 2010 at 12:06 a.m.
Suggest removal

The count on car/truck traffic on I-90-39 had one major flaw...many of us made the conscious decision long ago to drive alternate routes to and from Madison. It may take longer, but we are survivors! Also, agree totally with facts101 on off-ramp I-90 to Hwy. 26 northbound (fighting Walmart shoppers); as punishment, the traffic engineer who designed it should be forced to navigate it over and over again during peak travel times.

biffpocoroba
Sep 6, 2010 at 9:34 p.m.
Suggest removal

Amazing how you can drive from the northern netherregions of Wisconsin south and have a real pleasant roadway the entire length of the state until you hit the South Beltline 12/18 exit and southward. Nothing but whiteknuckling all summer long. Thoughts of getting my will and testement in order.

woody
Sep 6, 2010 at 6:46 p.m.
Suggest removal

We sure could use the money that Mike Sheridan's "GM road to no where" cost.

Haeight
Sep 6, 2010 at 2:54 p.m.
Suggest removal

There are more accidents in winter than in the summer. This is due to the prairie around the interstate, allowing for 30-60 mph cross winds. When your on a slick spot from drifting you lose control.

There has been a dramatic increase in traffic, and many more drivers speeding onto the interstate from the ramps merging without looking or merging into semi's. So a third lane might improve the merging around Janesville, but a majority of the issue is the butterfly ramps. People getting off and on at the same time.

I would suggest erecting walls or building hills on the west side for windbreaks. A third lane would only help the speeders drive crazy, using all three lanes to get ahead.

The most laughable part of using the interstate to get from Janesville to Beloit or back are the speeders doing 75 or more. 10 mph over the limit is only going to give you 3 miles or minutes in a 20 minute drive. Usually, once you hit town, within a few lights you have caught up to them. Then you get to wave and chuckle.

If your talking about a 1-2 hour drive you can get somewhere 10-20 minutes faster by speeding. If you have to speed to get there your not allotting enough time for random accidents.

jp53545
Sep 6, 2010 at 2:37 p.m.
Suggest removal

Yes, the rod should be expanded to 6 lanes from the Illinois state line to Madison. In addition to that, Highway 11 should be continued east from where it meets I-90 as (at minimum) a 4-lane expressway to meet up with I-43. The way I-43 was built connecting to I-90 at Beloit was a mistake obvious when the road was in the planning stages.

spicymarge
Sep 6, 2010 at 11:15 a.m.
Suggest removal

Thank heaven! The orange barrel companies will get to put on a new shift!

werpknarly
Sep 6, 2010 at 10:34 a.m.
Suggest removal

what the 'party not in power' does not want you to know is anything about macro-economics and the business cycle. the public perception is always at least 6 months behind reality. the VERY last thing companies do is hire.. etc. etc...

proartist
Sep 6, 2010 at 7:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3vz1i5Dy...
Highways surrounding urban centers will, out of necessity, become obsolete in a matter of years, by traffic congestion no matter how many lanes are added, by commuting time, and by vehicle miles traveled per driver. All are on the rise and simply increasing the size of highways while eating up some of the world's richest top soil will fail to be a solution almost as soon as each expansion project is completed. Suburban living and shopping, and commuter towns have created a dependency on cars, which has meant in increasing dependency on oil to complete even basic daily living tasks. It's a lifestyle proving itself more and more unhealthy for people and the planet while now increasingly more and more unsustainable. A wise Wisconsin would have a longer-term vision and put more investment into trains and other mass transit using renewable energy than trying to solve the new problems the same old ways.

facts101
Sep 6, 2010 at 7:04 a.m.
Suggest removal

Mudsill I agree this is way past due and needs to be done. And I also agree with Prevention on the safety of it all. Until they crack down on people on their cell phones driving 85+ and changing lanes and all the rest of the crazy people. I don't think an extra lane is going to matter. But safety is just one of the talking points. Since its an election year people are more concerned about "JOBS" than they are about safety. But they mention it as a side note. When you think about it a third lane just gives them more room to do crazy stunts. And who ever thought about that off ramp where you get off I-90 and then fight the people who want to get to Walmart. Sir you should be flogged until you agree it was a bad idea.

prevention
Sep 6, 2010 at 6:41 a.m.
Suggest removal

What does it matter, it won't make Rock County any safer to drive on I-90. I don't mean to sound insensitive, but how many accidents do you hear of each week regarding accidents on I-90 in Rock County alone? When travelling on I-90, doesn't anyone else have trouble with crazy drivers, especially on the exits around Milton Ave? JMO

jv92
Sep 5, 2010 at 10:13 p.m.
Suggest removal

Facts is dead on.

jv92
Sep 5, 2010 at 10:13 p.m.
Suggest removal

"the economy is turning around. stoughton trailer is opening more shifts and worried they cant keep up.. SSI is expanding... where is this this good news buried?" I saw it in the paper this morning, I believe its right after the unemployment numbers and right before the forclosure notices!

facts101
Sep 5, 2010 at 9:55 p.m.
Suggest removal

Kay I agree its taking your life in your own hands some days out there. And i don't have a problem spending this money. I know it will bring jobs and growth. My big problem is how its being done. You have a bunch of people who voted to raid the same fund that is supposed to pay for things like this. And now when its their butt on the line its like "see what I am doing for you now". My question to Sheridan and Hixson is what the hell have you been doing for two years? And why did you raid funds that were for building this road? I am fed up with the games and the BS coming from these people. The same people who only care about me when they want my vote. Well ya know what boys you may have fooled some people. But if you two turds were the last ones standing I would not vote for you.

BostonBill
Sep 5, 2010 at 9:51 p.m.
Suggest removal

The title of this article is, “Would I-90 expansion increase safety, economic development?”

I believe that it would increase safety. If you drive this dilapidated, over crowded excuse for a highway regularly, I think you would agree. Whether or not it would help the economy is debatable. Personally, when I travel to a place where I plan to spend money, I prefer to drive on a road that I believe is safe or else go somewhere else.

Kay5
Sep 5, 2010 at 9:44 p.m.
Suggest removal

I hope they build it. Between Beloit and Madison must be the most nerve wracking trek of the whole system.

werpknarly
Sep 5, 2010 at 9:24 p.m.
Suggest removal

btw.. they is where you spend money to make more money. increase access promotes growth and jobs

werpknarly
Sep 5, 2010 at 9:23 p.m.
Suggest removal

this should have been done nearly 20 years ago when they re-did rockford to lacross and I90 was expanded to three lanes from madison to portage. btw...ive hear from 2nd shift workers that late night I90 semi traffic is WAY UP... the economy is turning around. stoughton trailer is opening more shifts and worried they cant keep up.. SSI is expanding... where is this this good news buried?

facts101
Sep 5, 2010 at 7:37 p.m.
Suggest removal

Sheridan is up for re-election why do you think this is an issue this year. Five months ago this project did not even have a number and there was no money in the transportation fund to do it. Now as Sheridan and Hixson are fighting for their political lives it has a number. And along with Jim (lame duck) Doyle they are pushing this to be shovel ready. Well Doyle and the boys raided the transportation fund many times so there still is no money. So Doyle wants this shovel ready so the next guy can figure out how to pay for it. Nice trick since the next governor will most likely be Republican. We need to gut Madison and Washington to end these games. Put people there that are not professional politicians and see how fast things start turning around. A honest man or woman who is used to living within a budget. Someone who is not owned by special interest groups. I know it will never happen but I am allowed to have these types of dreams. We need to take are government back from the republicans and the democrats and give it back to the real honest people.

jv92
Sep 5, 2010 at 7:26 p.m.
Suggest removal

Hey...anybody now if that Sheridan guy is up for reelection? That's all this is. Even if the commission recommends it this is a long way off. Please...see this for what it is.

beeferer
Sep 5, 2010 at 5:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

Those who say more lanes will not make a difference with all of the idiots making boneheaded maneuvers aren't engaging all of their brain cells to think logically. If the road was wider it would give you more room to get out of their way. Period.

woodsman
Sep 5, 2010 at 4:55 p.m.
Suggest removal

Build more when they don't have the money to take of what they got?? Makes sense to me "NOT"

cynicaleye
Sep 5, 2010 at 4:43 p.m.
Suggest removal

When you have people making illegal u-turns, speeding, driving distracted, etc., more lanes will not make it safer. What will make it safer is if the state police start enforcing the law.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT