Railway renovation is really on a roll
Photo
JANESVILLE The Wisconsin & Southern Railroad doesn't need to wait until 2030 to experience the increasing freight demand that industry pundits are forecasting.
The Milwaukee-based railroad already is running more traffic on several of its lines and is expecting a 35 percent increase in the tonnage it hauls on its Janesville to Monroe line by 2013.
By the end of the month, WSOR will wrap up the first phase of a rehabilitation project that will help the railroad meet the demands of more customers for more freight deliveries in a more efficient fashion.
The project includes 40,000 new railroad ties and 18,000 tons of granite rock ballast. It required a crew of 30 employees working throughout the summer and fall.
"What we've done this year is the surface work," said Ken Lucht, WSOR's manager of community development. "The next phase will take place in 2013 when we lay continuous-welded rail on the line."
The line currently has lighter, jointed rail that was laid more than 80 years ago, Lucht said. The shift to a heavier rail will allow trains to increase their speed from 10 mph to 25 mph and carry heaver loads.
"It will result in much more reliable service," he said.
Wisconsin & Southern is Wisconsin's second-largest railroad with more than 600 miles of track owned cooperatively by the state and 18 southern Wisconsin counties. Much of that track is far below industry standards for carrying cars that weigh 286,000 pounds.
Still, WSOR is a major player in Rock County, where last year alone it had 200 employees who handled more than 9,000 rail cars.
This year, WSOR will transport nearly 500,000 tons of ethanol, grain, carbon dioxide, feed products, sand and gravel over the line. Trains run three days a week or on customer demand.
"Our customer base is growing, and as they come out of the recession, we're seeing customers who may have shipments two days a week asking for shipments three or five days a week," Lucht said. "We will continue to work with the state and counties as partners to rebuild the rail system.
"The national estimates call for a 75 percent increase in freight tonnage by 2030, and some of that will certainly apply to our area so the system needs to be ready."
Local economic development officials have said that more than one-third of the inquiries they get from prospective businesses are interested in rail service.
And if fuel prices remain high, freight rail will continue to be a competitive alternative to over-the-road trucking.
The cost for the first phase of work between Janesville and Monroe is $4.2 million, 80 percent of which is being paid by a state grant. The balance is being split equally between the Pecatonica Rail Transit Commission and WSOR.
The railroad unsuccessfully sought federal stimulus funding for the project. Had it been successful, WSOR would have moved almost immediately to the rail upgrade between Janesville and Monroe.
Despite all of the talk swirling around the future of high-speed rail in Wisconsin and Governor-elect Scott Walker's efforts to divert funding to other projects, Lucht said WSOR has not received any indications that some of the federal money would be diverted to freight rail projects.
WSOR also is nearing completion on the first phase of work on the 31-mile line between Milton and Madison. Crews this year laid about 14 miles of 115-pound welded rail. The remainder will be put down next year, Lucht said.
Wisconsin Republicans want states to have alternatives for high-speed rail money
Three Republican congressmen from Wisconsin have introduced a bill that would give states the option of returning federal funds that are earmarked for high-speed rail projects.
The bill introduced Tuesday would let states redirect the money to the U.S. Treasury toward reducing the national debt.
The legislation was introduced by Reps. Jim Sensenbrenner, Paul Ryan and Tom Petri. They say it would give states flexibility in prioritizing how tax dollars are spent.
Their bill could be relevant in Wisconsin, where Republican Governor-elect Scott Walker has said he doesn't want the $810 million that has been allocated for Wisconsin's high-speed rail project.
The federal government says if the money isn't used for high-speed rail in Wisconsin, it'll be used for high-speed rail in another state.
"We share Governor-elect Scott Walker's commitment to improving Wisconsin's transportation infrastructure and his efforts to bring fiscal responsibility back to our state and the federal government," the three said in a statement. "Instead of being told by bureaucrats in Washington how to allocate their resources, states need to have the flexibility and authority to prioritize how tax dollars are being spent.
"However, the Obama Administration's stimulus package does not allow these stimulus funds to be reprogrammed for other worthwhile transportation projects."
The representatives said their legislation would give states the ability to return federal funds obligated to high-speed rail projects and instead use the money to reduce the nation's $1.6 trillion deficit.
"This high-speed rail project is a bad investment for taxpayers, and our state simply cannot afford it," the three said.
The Democratic Party of Wisconsin said that with this new legislation the three Republican lawmakers have acknowledged that Walker's plan to divert the money to road projects would never fly.
"What a rare act of political courage for a career politician like Paul Ryan to wait until after an election to acknowledge that Scott Walker was lying all along," said Mike Tate, chairman of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin.

Nov 19, 2010 at 9:45 a.m.
Suggest removal
truth1, they both have economic advantages, which vary according to geography, demographics, and many other factors. The Midwest route system with a Chicago hub has been studied for 30 years and again and again the conclusion has come back that it would be ideal for high speed passenger rail.
.
While some public investment in freight rail is important -- the WSOR operates largely on publicly-owned rail lines -- most railroads are private enterprises. Even looking at state and federal subsidies for these businesses, most of it goes toward maintenance of existing rights of way. Given the structure of freight rail in this country, high speed is not a critical priority.
.
The investment differential is different for high-speed rail. It is outside the realm of private enterprise. (Most high speed rail around the world is at least partially state-owned.) The necessary investment per mile is much, much larger. That is why concentrating these monies on critical corridors is important. Spreading that money around the entire state's freight rail system might have some economic impact, but that level of investment has not been studied for thirty years the way that high speed passenger rail has, so to back it without affirmative understanding of the return on investment is really pretty foolish -- of Walker and anyone who jumps on his caboose.
Nov 18, 2010 at 2:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
If you need a job, look into the major railroads. They will be hiring 10,000 people in the next 6 months...
Nov 18, 2010 at 9:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
Freight rail improvement would actually have a HUGELY greater economic effect.
Nov 18, 2010 at 9:39 a.m.
Suggest removal
janesvillean- The grandstanding just started months ago.......there wasn't the political opportunity for it before like there is now.
........
Freight is where rail will by far do the most good...maybe passenger rail will be viable down the line but freight rail is much more important because of the sheer weight involved and would have a much greater economic advantage.
Nov 18, 2010 at 9:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
good idea, we could also hook cars up with small trailers or put packages in trunks that commute from town to town every day, eliminate over the road trucking all together.
Nov 18, 2010 at 8:32 a.m.
Suggest removal
I thought all the rail lines are bike paths now? Maybe they can give all the riders a sack of corn and drop it off. We really underestimate the economy and "green" promise that rail commerce could be. i thought this states motto was "FORWARD". I see nothing new happening, rich getting richer, poor getting poorer.
Nov 18, 2010 at 12:13 a.m.
Suggest removal
truth1, I've been a backer of high speed rail longer than some people here have been alive, and I can assure you that in all that time there has been precious little grandstanding in favor of high speed rail -- otherwise we'd have some by now.
.
The main reason wooden ties continue in use is that they are much cheaper. Concrete is used on high-speed passenger corridors, though, and different railroads each have their own preferences.
.
As to speed, the line is being upgraded from Class 1 to Class 2. Upgrading further would require even more investment -- in roadbed, track materials, crossing safety, and so forth. Most rail traffic these days is not particularly time-sensitive.
Nov 17, 2010 at 9:58 p.m.
Suggest removal
they use wood probably because it is slightly loose and allows for thermal expansion and contraction. Also the railroad floats on the rock bed and moves up and down some when the cars go over, wood has flex to it, concrete doesnt.
Nov 17, 2010 at 8:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
I wonder why they continue to use wooden ties instead of concrete ties like they use in Europe. not only do they last longer they are better for the environment.
Nov 17, 2010 at 8:07 p.m.
Suggest removal
crossing also have a lot to do with speed... i think faster speeds require more controled crossing.
Nov 17, 2010 at 8:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
no worries.. money is already gone: "Earlier this week, LaHood told a conference of high-speed rail supporters in New York City that federal officials would move quickly to reallocate the $810 million in federal stimulus money allocated to Wisconsin and the $400 million allocated to Ohio, the Washington Post reported."
http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepoliti...
Nov 17, 2010 at 7:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
I think those cars are over 100 tons each.......60 would be good but even 40 would be moving right along with a trainload like that.......It seems like the UP goes a lot faster with their heavy freights though.....Its probably the equipment of the less well-financed small railroad that won't take that weight to that speed.
Nov 17, 2010 at 6:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
"The shift to a heavier rail will allow trains to increase their speed from 10 mph to 25 mph ..."
With new roadbed, new ties, and heavy continuous-welded rail, they should be able to safely operate upwards of 60 mph. I'd be interested to learn why they are getting such a small increase of speed after the upgrade.
Nov 17, 2010 at 5:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
The heavy welded rail for the freights should be done NOW, not 2013, but washington and other politicians can't HAVE that....
Nov 17, 2010 at 5:33 p.m.
Suggest removal
The "high speed" money should be spent on stuff like this freight rail, something that really NEEDS doing to get freight trucks OFF the highways.......but, then, of course, it wouldn't have the "HIGH-SPEED" moniker that the politicians like so much....they just love to grandstand on that.
Nov 17, 2010 at 4:58 p.m.
Suggest removal
This bill is a stunt; it has no chance of passing, in this lame-duck Democratic House, let alone in next year's Senate. But it's instructive: they want states to have a veto over other states using federal funds. It doesn't matter that the budgetary purpose of the stimulus was to create jobs -- now that we've got long-term unemployment, and its attendant wage suppression, in place, the thing they want most to do with the money is going to be the least fiscally effective.
Nov 17, 2010 at 4:25 p.m.
Suggest removal
I think Scott Walker's transportation plan is for high speed bus service. Way cheaper than high speed rail.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.