Rock County voters like medical examiner plan

By TED SULLIVAN   Wednesday, Nov. 3, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Referendum


Question: Should the County of Rock exercise its authority under Article VI, Section 4 (2) of the Wisconsin Constitution to replace the existing elected Office of Coroner with a County appointed medical examiner system, effective January 2015?

Yes 25,441

No 19,775

— Rock County residents want an appointed medical examiner.

Voters sent that message to the county board on Tuesday in an advisory referendum asking whether they wanted to keep an elected coroner or switch to an appointed medical examiner.

Board members, however, don't have to follow the referendum's outcome because it was not binding. Any change wouldn't be effective until 2014 because Coroner Jenifer Keach was elected Tuesday to a four-year term.

The coroner vs. medical examiner issue has been divisive.

Proponents of keeping a coroner say residents have a right to vote for who is in charge and can be trusted to elect a qualified person.

People favoring a medical examiner, however, say anyone could be elected coroner without qualifications. They say an appointed position guarantees a qualified person is hired.

Coroner proponents say the coroner is an independent investigator. They say a medical examiner could be influenced to rule causes of death a certain way.

People favoring a medical examiner, though, say the coroner's independence is the problem. They say county officials can't hold a coroner accountable or discipline the office.

Proponents of a coroner's office say the system has always worked, but opponents say coroners don't set policy like legislators. They say the position would be better if politics were taken out of it.

The cost and size of the medical examiner's office or the requirements of a hired medical examiner have not been set.

Board members have been debating the coroner or medical examiner issue for years. They voted in 2005 to change the position from an elected coroner to an appointed medical examiner after former Coroner Karen Gilbertson was arrested for stealing prescription drugs from death scenes.

In March 2009, the board changed its mind and voted to keep an elected coroner before the medical examiner change ever took place.

More than a year later—after complaints were filed against Keach—some board members changed their mind again. The board chose in May to have voters decide the issue in the referendum.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(12)
belman
Nov 5, 2010 at 2:08 p.m.
Suggest removal

This funning that the County Board did not even worry about this until after the Former Coroner was fired ( A Rep ) and a ( A Dem ) was appointed by the law. Then they have spent a large amount of time and effort to change. It is time to change the Board until they understand we are not all rich and have deep pockets unlike themself.

malky15
Nov 5, 2010 at 1:48 p.m.
Suggest removal

Look at the last few votes on the ME issue from the board and tell me they're non-partisan. The administrator may get to select (which I highly doubt) but the board gets to vote on the person (after heavy influence on who gets picked in the first place). You could have the best qualified person on the planet apply, but if the chairman or another one of his yes votes doesn't like the person they will not get the job. They will appoint based on what they want not what is best for the county. They always have, always will. Case in point, there is a vacant spot on the board right now, who do you think is going to get that spot? I'll wager on someone that will do the chair's bidding. To say that it's not going to be politicized is laughable.

janesvillean
Nov 4, 2010 at 4:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

An appointed examiner selected on the basis of merit, as with the city's police and fire chiefs, is the exact opposite of "politicized".
.
Note that nobody has actually voted for the system to be replaced. This was an advisory referendum.

partarican1
Nov 4, 2010 at 1:39 p.m.
Suggest removal

So I'm not sure why the majority of Rock County voters want to politicize the coroner position-I don't like the idea of a few elites selecting the person in charge of dealing with "foul-play" death investigations; talk about good ole' boy politics.... I really hope the county does NOT listen to the referendum and continues to have a coroner instead of an ME.

malky15
Nov 4, 2010 at 1:01 p.m.
Suggest removal

Uhh, what plan? I haven't seen one. The board has been asked for one, several times, and has produced nothing.

eatlessmovemore
Nov 4, 2010 at 11:46 a.m.
Suggest removal

Nothing like the minority blaming the majority of being ignorant and un-informed.

cynicaleye
Nov 4, 2010 at 10:54 a.m.
Suggest removal

What would this cost taxpayers?

packersfan1
Nov 4, 2010 at 10:39 a.m.
Suggest removal

We should keep our right to vote for a coroner. We should also have the right to vote for a mayor, which we don't have now.

harperb
Nov 4, 2010 at 10:11 a.m.
Suggest removal

Interesting that the Board STILL hasn't put forth a proposal of the cost's and required changes that would have to occur for a Medical Examiner. Those who voted probably think they are getting a forensic pathologist to do autopsies. Rock County doesn't even have a storage facility to hold our loved ones. Rock County isn't going to hire a forensic pathologist, all it is-is a name change and the fact that the Board can control the Office. In other words the Board can control how a death investigation proceeds (even though none of the Board members have no death investigation experience) and they can be an intimidating influence if they have a family member pass away from drug related or some type of embarassing death. Taking the right of the citizens to vote is disgusting. Our county has been operating on a coroner's, sheriff's, district attorney, clerk system for centuries. Should we also have the Board take our rights to vote for those offices as well?

ljs64
Nov 4, 2010 at 9:48 a.m.
Suggest removal

"Board members, however, don't have to follow the referendum's outcome because it was not binding."
**************
What a crock.........

belman
Nov 4, 2010 at 9:28 a.m.
Suggest removal

This just show's how stupid the current County Board thinks of the average county person is. We are now going to pay twice as much for someone to do the same job. It is now time to flush out the current leadership of the County Board this coming spring. We can not let them keep stealing from our pockets. They keep adding more FEEs and TAXes to a County that can not pay the bill. Let us place on the referendum to cut the County Board by half. Lets start with the CHAIR. We pay for 29 people in a county that should have maybe 15. This is great example of the OLD BOYS CLUB. If you were stupid to vote to give away your right to vote for an office then you need to pay more of your tax money to these crooks.

jasondowd
Nov 3, 2010 at 6:09 p.m.
Suggest removal

It will be interesting to see what happens. Those who wanted to remove the right from voters to vote for their coroner will be using the voters to support their cause. Those that wanted to have voters keep their ability to vote will now have to decide if they will grant the wishes of voters by removing their right to vote. Interesting development.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT