Board gives superintendent good marks

By FRANK SCHULTZ ( Contact )   Thursday, March 25, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— The Janesville School Board is generally pleased with its superintendent about one year after she took over, but at least one board member was displeased with one aspect of her performance.

The board reviewed its evaluation of Superintendent Karen Schulte in closed session Monday.

The board issued a statement Wednesday, praising Schulte for "increased transparency" about district operations, increased participation on parent- and staff-satisfaction surveys, openness to listen to all stakeholders and "professional conduct in all district activities."

Board President DuWayne Severson said this is the second time the board has evaluated Schulte using a survey that asks the nine board members to rate Schulte's performance. The survey asked the board to rate her on six criteria:

-- Responsiveness to the board's needs. Five members rated her as excellent or above average, three said she was average, and one said she was below average.

-- Willingness to listen to board members' concerns. Seven said excellent or above average. Two said average.

-- Quality of her communications to the board. Four said excellent or above average, three said average and two said below average.

-- Professional conduct and behavior. Seven said excellent or above average. Two said average.

-- Courtesy. Seven said excellent or above average. Two said average.

-- Overall satisfaction of board members. One said excellent, four above average and three average.

The responses were converted to number scores, which were weighted and then averaged to a 3.93 on a 5-point scale.

A similar year-end board survey will become part of Schulte's overall evaluation, Severson said. The Gazette plans a look at the new evaluation system in Sunday's editions.

As with other satisfaction surveys the district has been conducting, no names were connected to the individual responses. The Studer Group, which has been partnering with the district in a quality-improvement initiative, processed the results, Severson said.

Severson said the lower marks probably had something to do with the fact that most of the district's top administrators have been replaced in the past year.

"Dr. Schulte and her leadership team continue to develop a greater cohesiveness to provide more timely and informative responses to the board of education and others," according to the statement.

"The board is very pleased," Severson said. "We think things are definitely going in the right direction."

Schulte is in her first year of a two-year contract. Her pay was not a topic of discussion Tuesday, Severson said.

Nothing new in contract talks

Negotiators of a new Janesville teachers contract remained tight-lipped after meeting Wednesday night.

Co-lead negotiator for the teachers, Jim Reif, e-mailed the Gazette to report that the two sides met for two hours and "we discussed various topics."

The school district side did not respond Wednesday to requests for an update.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(6)
1jvlopinion
Apr 13, 2010 at 11:41 p.m.
Suggest removal

I agree with badger4life. Notice the board's evaluation focus: "the board..." "the board..." the board ! !" How self-absorbed are they in the power and the glory of being "the board" and having people jump through their hoops? How about what the students, and the staff and the parents think about how well the superintendent is doing? And if people think "the board" is a representation of that, I think they are kidding themselves. Yes, it IS unfortunate that more people don't run for the positions. We could probably all speculate as to why that is. Interesting that 4 out of 6 of "the board's" criteria had to do with THEM, but those that had to do with characteristics like professionalism and courtesy were mostly above average. How about identifying assessment criteria (for the board and administrators) that has to do with students, education, staff turn-over (including administrators), safety, discipline, working conditions, availability of time and tools to do the job, etc. Things that are a reflection of effectiveness, and not just how much time and effort is put into "pleasing the board?" I think the superintendent and the board need to serve the schools, and not the other way around!

biggirl
Mar 27, 2010 at 8:13 a.m.
Suggest removal

Napalm: The PUBLIC school system is most definitely not a business because it is not established to make money. To understand why it's not in our interest to have a for-profit school system, you just need to look at for-profit insurance companies and HMOs.

JCena
Mar 26, 2010 at 12:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

Isn't the school board elected by the citizens? Isn't that the "publics rating of the school board"? If you don't like the actions of board members, don't vote for them. Consider running yourself. BE THE CHANGE.

I am pretty sure anyone can write or call any of the board members if they want to "offer constructive criticism to allow for the School District to better serve the children of our future".

prevention
Mar 25, 2010 at 10:52 p.m.
Suggest removal

I am glad to hear that the Board seems to have an overall good rating of the Superintendent. I believe that it would also benefit the School Board, Superintendent, and school district, if they took up with badger4life's suggestion of letting the public rate the school board and superintendent. Maybe adding in a requirement of the survey that people must offer constructive criticism to allow for the School District to better serve the children of our future!

badger4life
Mar 25, 2010 at 7:18 p.m.
Suggest removal

When do we get to the see the publics rating of the school board? Perhaps there could be a Studer survey done on them. Hopefully there will be a few fresh new faces after the next election.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT