Obama to speak about health care in Iowa City
Photo
In this March 3, 2010, file photo President Barack Obama pauses while speaking about health care reform in the East Room of the White House in Washington. With private pitches to Democrats Obama begins an all-out push to coax Congress into passing his health care proposals, while confronting party unrest on his left and right, calling for political courage, citing historic opportunities, and essentially saying "trust me."
DES MOINES, Iowa President Barack Obama will speak about health care Thursday in Iowa City, marking passage of the historic legislation by returning to the place where he proposed his reform plan in 2007 while campaigning for the Democratic nomination.
Obama will "discuss how health care insurance reform lowers costs for small businesses and American families and gives them more control over their health care," said Matthew Lehrich, a White House spokesman.
The visit will come four days after the House approved a bill extending health care to millions of uninsured Americans and preventing insurance companies from denying coverage on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions. Obama could sign the bill as soon as Tuesday.
Obama chose Iowa City because the eastern Iowa college town was where he first offered his health care plan on May 29, 2007. Lehrich said the plan launched "a grassroots campaign for reform that led directly to the legislation passed this week."
Obama announced his health care plan about eight months before Iowa's caucuses, where he had a surprisingly strong win and gained the momentum that ultimately led to the Democratic nomination. In the 2008 general election, Obama easily won Iowa's seven electoral votes.
Although Obama's support of health care reform was key in the support he received in the caucuses, the president will find widely divergent opinions on the issue in Iowa.
All three Republican candidates for governor opposed Obama's health care plan, with state Rep. Rod Roberts and businessman Bob Vander Plaats calling for amending the Iowa Constitution to block the measure.
Vander Plaats described it as "federalism run amok at best and, at worst, a big step toward socialism."
GOP gubernatorial candidate Terry Branstad hasn't said whether he'd support a constitutional amendment, but he issued a statement Monday criticizing the reform plan.
"We can ill afford another trillion dollars in spending by the federal government," Branstad said.
Democratic Gov. Chet Culver has been a strong supporter of Obama's health care proposal.
Longtime Democratic activist Jerry Crawford said he believes support for the plan will grown in the state, and nationally, over time.
"The advantage he has is the opposition was so over the top in predicting that the world would end," Crawford said. "Sooner rather than later people are going to figure out that the world didn't end."
Drake University political science professor Dennis Goldford said he thought passage of the health care bill would give Obama a boost or at least avoid the mess the president would have faced if it had failed.
"If he had lost this it would have been disastrous," said Goldford. "People would be saying that Democrats can't govern."
Mark Daley, a Democratic strategist who is working for Democratic Senate hopeful Roxanne Conlin, said Obama's visit would put the spotlight on Sen. Charles Grassley.
Grassley, who is seeking a sixth term in the Senate, worked through last summer with Democrats on health care reform but eventually became a prominent opponent of the effort.
"This presidential visit is great for us because it's going to remind Iowans of what they have in Washington," Daley said, referring to Grassley.
Grassley issued a statement predicting the measure approved by the House would raise taxes, hurt Medicare and cause health insurance premiums to rise.
"Rather than bring the country together around some commonsense reforms, this bill has driven the country further apart, at the very time we need to come together, especially for economic recovery efforts," he said.

Mar 23, 2010 at 10:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
oops forgot the link
http://www.slate.com/id/2223023/
Mar 23, 2010 at 10:26 a.m.
Suggest removal
Yeah, looks like the 160 concessions are not really bend over backward concessions after all.
And no I will not look at media matters site anymore that I would huffpost or limbaughs
Mar 23, 2010 at 10:22 a.m.
Suggest removal
I don't have the time to research this morning, if I recall correctly there were three versions of a health bill attempt in the Senate, Sen Dodd's was one. The one the Senate voted on came from another committee not the committed from the u-tube clip. I have been wrong before...
Mar 23, 2010 at 10:04 a.m.
Suggest removal
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/featur...
& http://mediamatters.org/research/2009111...
Mar 23, 2010 at 10 a.m.
Suggest removal
Examples:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nz5AmhI9g...
&
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/...
Mar 23, 2010 at 9:35 a.m.
Suggest removal
Gary, please list the concessions you claim are in the bill that the president is signing today.
Mar 23, 2010 at 9:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
The democrats wrote the bill, debated it behind closed doors and never had Republican input. They didn't need it because they had the votes to pass it without any help from the Republicans.
Mar 23, 2010 at 9:29 a.m.
Suggest removal
Agree completely, garyprimer! To say there was no bipartisanship is to not realize there were over 200 amendments inserted by the GOP, even more they had written for insertion and then voted against, and then Republicans still voted against the very same! Were they intent on insertions weakening the bill (i.e. taking out the public option) so they could later try to feign the legislation's "failure" someday?
Mar 23, 2010 at 9:29 a.m.
Suggest removal
garyprimer: concessions to Republicans? What planet are you living on? Did you even watch that photo op of meeting Obama had to listen to the other side's options and questions? He didn't take one single proposal from the Republicans--he laughed in their face. Go back to your daydreams!
Mar 23, 2010 at 9:05 a.m.
Suggest removal
The problem with the bill is that too many concessions were given to the Republicans with the hope that they would behave like adults.
Mar 23, 2010 at 8:05 a.m.
Suggest removal
If it was such a good program, the President and congress would use it. But they have their own perks.
Mar 23, 2010 at 3:43 a.m.
Suggest removal
If it was such a good program there would be no need to keep telling people they didn't get taken.
Mar 22, 2010 at 10:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
This will be speech 56 on the same topic. Nothing new just more of the usual BS.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.