Supreme Court to hear Walworth County case

By PEDRO OLIVEIRA JR.   Tuesday, March 2, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— The Wisconsin Supreme Court today will hear arguments in the case of a man whose Walworth County bail jumping conviction was reversed because of an invalid arrest warrant.

After Michael R. Hess of Walworth County was convicted in 2007 of sixth-offense drunken driving, he failed to cooperate with the pre-sentence investigation writer. A judge issued an arrest warrant to compel Hess to cooperate.

Hess was intoxicated at the time a sheriff's deputy took him into custody, and Hess was charged with felony bail jumping because the terms of his bond required him to stay sober.

The 2nd District Court of Appeals ruled that the arrest warrant was invalid because Judge James Carlson had no power to issue a civil arrest for a criminal accusation. The appeals court wrote that Hess had not been not ordered to comply with the pre-sentence investigation writer, and his lack of cooperation was no reason for an arrest warrant.

With the arrest warrant deemed invalid and the resulting evidence suppressed, Hess' felony bail jumping conviction was reversed.

The state appealed.

Assistant Attorney General Aaron O'Neil wrote in his appeal to the Supreme Court that the good-faith exception should apply because the sheriff's deputy who arrested Hess and tested his blood alcohol content was under the impression that the arrest warrant was valid.

The good faith exception is a part of the law that allows courts to exempt evidence gathered during the execution of an arrest warrant or search warrant. The exception is an effort to prevent judicial errors from prompting suppression of evidence.

Hess’ case appears to be the first case in Wisconsin addressing the application of the good faith exception in the context of an arrest warrant rather than a search warrant, O’Neil wrote.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court was scheduled to hear Hess' case at 9:45 a.m. today.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(2)
janesvillean
Mar 3, 2010 at 1:40 a.m.
Suggest removal

Uh, dub190, he was convicted, which is indeed how an appeals process is begun. Most people who are acquitted tend not to appeal!

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT