School board candidates share views at forum

By FRANK SCHULTZ ( Contact )   Tuesday, March 2, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Photo

Karl Dommerhausen

Photo

Kristin L. Hesselbacher

Photo

Diedre Richard

Photo

Peter D. Severson

On TV


The Janesville School Board candidates forum will be shown on Janesville cable TV channels 96 and 993 at midnight, 3 a.m., 6 a.m., 9 a.m., noon, 3 p.m., 6 p.m., and 9 p.m. Thursday and Saturday as well as on March 13, 21, 24, 27 and 29.

— A Janesville School Board member said the board bears some responsibility for not knowing about money spent on the recent high school improvement projects.

The district administration recently told the board at least $390,000 was shifted from the district’s operating budget to the referendum project this year, apparently without the board’s approval.

The administration has not yet detailed what happened, but school board member Tim Cullen has said more than $3 million may have been spent without board approval.

Peter D. Severson, who is running for re-election, said at a candidates forum Monday that he and other board members did not ask the right questions as the $70.8 million referendum project went forward.

“I think over the next couple of months we’ll be asking those hard questions because I think we’ve seen the error of our ways,” Severson said in response to a question at the forum, sponsored by the League of Women Voters and Janesville Area Council PTA.

Four candidates are running for three seats in the April 6 elections. They are incumbents Severson and Diedre Richard as well as Karl Dommershausen and Kristin Hesselbacher.

Renee’ Bue’s name also will appear on the ballot, but Bue told The Janesville Gazette on Monday that she has informed the school district she is no longer running.

Richard said it’s not yet clear how much was spent that the board didn’t know about.

“I feel strongly there needs to be accountability,” Richard said, adding that it appears most of the decisions were made more than a year ago, when the district had a different superintendent, business director and comptroller.

“I don’t know if anyone can be penalized if they’re not here,” Richard said.

Severson noted that the voters only approved borrowing the $70.8 million, not the actual spending.

Dommershausen said the board should learn how it happened and should install safeguards so it doesn’t happen in the future.

“I don’t feel I want to hang anyone or be after anyone,” Dommershausen said.

Hesselbacher also asked for an accounting of any “discrepancies.”

If the board didn’t approve some of the spending, “then perhaps that needs to be addressed,” Hesselbacher said.

Here are some other responses at the forum:

WRS liability question

Candidates differed on how to pay off a $17 million liability to the Wisconsin Retirement System. If the district continues past practice, the liability would balloon to more than $30 million by 2029.

Dommershausen said the district could have started paying off the liability years ago, and he’s not sure why it wasn’t.

Dommershausen said more information is needed, but “we have a problem, and we must solve it.”

Hesselbacher noted that the two basic options are to take out a loan and pay off the liability at an interest rate that is below the 7.8 percent the state charges or to go to referendum to issue bonds. Bonds are a different form of borrowing that would raise taxes but not take money from the operating budget.

“I’m not sure the district is ready for another referendum,” Hesselbacher said, so a loan would be best.

Richard said it’s too early to decide the best course, as all the information is not yet in hand.

Severson agreed more information is needed but “I would probably lean right now towards trying a referendum” in order to relieve pressure on the budget.

If the referendum fails, the board could then borrow, Severson added.

Drug dog searches

A caller asked whether the candidates favored having police dogs sniff staff members’ cars as well as those of students. None did.

Dommershausen at first said the decision should be up to police and school authorities, but then he said he would like to think about the question before responding further.

Hesselbacher said she served on a committee that considered the question, and the consensus was that the dog searches’ goal is to deter students—not staff—from bringing drugs to school. She noted that the dogs tire after sniffing about 200 cars or 200 lockers, so a decision would have to be made about what’s most important.

Richard said staff cars should not be sniffed because the objective is to deter students.

Students are minors and as such have less of an expectation of privacy, Richard added.

Severson said he prefers staff members’ cars not be searched because of privacy issues.

Saving energy

Asked about saving water and energy, candidates differed in their emphasis.

Dommershausen said that when he ran for school board last year, he was advocating the district look into geothermal energy.

Even though the initial investment would be expensive, “I believe we should take a hard look at it.”

Hesselbacher said the district should consider buildings that have inefficient heating/cooling systems, but she noted upgrading those systems would be “very expensive.”

Richard said the district should stay away from such big-ticket costs and focus on changing behaviors, such as emphasizing turning off lights and turning down thermostats to make a difference.

Severson said the district missed opportunities with the recent high school additions to include enhancements such as geothermal energy.

---

Renee’ Bue said Monday she is dropping out of the race for Janesville School board because of “personal health issues.”

“Right now I just didn’t feel I could commit to being on the school board if I am having these issues,” Bue said.

Bue’s name still will appear on the ballot, said County Clerk Lori Stottler.

Stottler said if Bue is elected she could resign, and then the school board could appoint someone to serve a one-year term. The board also could decide to go with eight members for a year, but Stottler, also a Janesville School Board member, thought that would be unlikely.

Bue, 48, is bilingual outreach coordinator at Hedberg Public Library. She had said that if elected she wanted to improve communications between the board, teachers and families.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(13)
rossnmeg
Mar 4, 2010 at 1:31 p.m.
Suggest removal

"Dommershausen said the district could have started paying off the liability years ago, and he’s not sure why it wasn’t."
- Because under the QEO, there was no point in paying it off!
--
"Dommershausen said that when he ran for school board last year, he was advocating the district look into geothermal energy."
- The payback on geothermal is horrendous. It is a nightmare to maintain and isn't very economical despite being eco-friendly.
--
This guy scares me.

helge1939
Mar 4, 2010 at 5:26 a.m.
Suggest removal

It has been showen that some staff are not what they should be in some school's so there for they too need to be watch'ed. Most are very dedicat'ed to there employment

theone
Mar 3, 2010 at 9:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

"Richard said staff cars should not be sniffed because the objective is to deter students."

Actually, I thought schools are supposed to be a drug free zone and as such the objective is to deter everybody.

jetski30
Mar 3, 2010 at 4:54 p.m.
Suggest removal

Since when do we compare our teachers with students? Minors don't have the same rights as our educators! We need to respect what teachers do for our children everyday and give them the respect they deserve. Stay away from our teachers, do not put them on the same level as a student! They need to have the respect of today's kids back in the classroom!

dc510190
Mar 3, 2010 at 12:34 p.m.
Suggest removal

If the money was coming out of your checking account I think you would know where it was going. The fact that you do not want to look for people or hold people accountable leads me to believe that the fault is your own. If this occurred anywhere else someone would be arrested and or forced to step down. In respect to the dog searches everyone should be searched, anyone can search the internet and find stories of teachers and or employees selling drugs, or having a drug problem if the reason for the searches is to protect our students then the protection needs to start from the top down.

whythink
Mar 3, 2010 at 12:11 p.m.
Suggest removal

Do any of you believe there is a difference between the average Teacher and the average high school or middle school student?
.
Should they really be treated EXACTLY the same regarding drug use/abuse?
.
I really don't care if they do or don't search the cars of the staff but if they do there should be a better reason than...they attend school here to.
.

samueladams1775
Mar 3, 2010 at 10:32 a.m.
Suggest removal

I know an officer who partners with a drug dog. He says its more like 100 "searchs" and the dogs ability goes way down. So, where do you use your 100 searches? On kids vehicles or teachers/staff. The issue is 99.9% kids, so let's follow the police advice and search the kids cars and lockers first. Teachers as a group are not perfect, but probably cleaner than most professions, because if they get caught with drugs they can loose their teaching license for LIFE! The problem is the students bringing drugs to school, thank God the board are expelling all the kids caught with drugs at school.

yada
Mar 3, 2010 at 7:03 a.m.
Suggest removal

V*o*T*e Diedre Richard - An intelligent individual that will ask the right questions and help the Janesville school district.

Domino
Mar 3, 2010 at 12:28 a.m.
Suggest removal

I will tell you why it's not a good idea to search students or staff vehicles. What happens to the student or staff member who buys a used vehicle from someone who has been doing drugs? Or what it an older sibling used drugs in the car and then someone takes it to school. This will lead to lawsuits and it could potentially ruin someone's life or career.

wisconsinheat
Mar 2, 2010 at 11:40 p.m.
Suggest removal

The privacy excuse is lame.

Hizzoner
Mar 2, 2010 at 11:37 p.m.
Suggest removal

That's exactly right Sarah.

SarahB1
Mar 2, 2010 at 9:47 p.m.
Suggest removal

I disagree with these folks. They are against police dogs checking staff cars. If the goal is to keep drugs out of the schools, then why not check staff cars if they are parked on school property?

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT