Janesville freshman teams saved, but cuts still considered
Photo 
Stephen D. Sperry
Photo 
Keith Pennington
JANESVILLE Janesville high schools will keep all their football and volleyball teams this year.
That’s good news for freshman players and their parents, who were not sure what would happen as district officials eyed those teams for budget cuts.
Football and volleyball each have two freshman teams. One of those freshman teams in each sport was on the chopping block as the school board considered budget cuts Tuesday.
The board backed away from making specific cuts. Instead, the board told the administration to cut $80,000 from the sports budget.
Steve Sperry, director of administrative and human resources, said he believes the board on Tuesday was telling administration not to cut freshman football or volleyball teams because those seasons are too close at hand.
However, the required budget cuts could mean that the way those teams are coached might change, Sperry said.
Everything in the $1.34 million athletics budget is being scrutinized for possible cuts, Sperry said.
That includes one of the two freshman teams in boys and girls basketball at each school, Sperry said.
Sperry met Wednesday with Parker Principal Steve Schroeder and Craig assistant principal/athletics director Monte Phillips, among others, to discuss what could be done.
Each school will consider possible cuts over the next few days and consult with coaches, Sperry said. A follow-up meeting is set for Monday.
Coaching positions, supplies, middle school sports costs and everything else are on the table, with a goal of cutting $80,000 to $100,000, Sperry said.
The athletics budget already took a cut of 30 percent of its supplies budget in this year’s budget, Chief Financial Officer Keith Pennington said. All departments took a similar cut in supplies.
That leaves about $1.34 million for sports, which is subject to the $80,000 cut, taking it down to $1.26 million, Pennington said. That’s a cut of about 6 percent.
The cuts would come on the top of reductions in previous years. The district no longer has a district athletics director. That position was cut in 2009. And $50,000 was cut from the budget in 2007.
A $50-per-sport fee was instituted in 2006. The school board briefly discussed an increase in the sports fee Tuesday but took no action. Some noted that other districts have much higher fees.
The grade-school track meet also was on the administration’s original list of cuts, but Sperry said he wasn’t sure if the board wanted it to be considered, now.
“We need to get some further direction (to see) if the board was including that or not including that,” Sperry said.
School board member Karl Dommershausen, who offered Tuesday to head up a fundraiser to preserve the grade-school meet, said Wednesday he’s still willing, if needed.
Sperry said booster club efforts to support other sports also would be welcomed, but the administration wants to be sure that one high school doesn’t benefit from a large fundraiser while the other school doesn’t, so a joint project would be considered.

Jul 31, 2010 at 1:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
So we add on these huge fieldhouses and improve a bunch of the athletic facilities and now the board is going to look at cutting teams? This seems a bit a$$ backwards in my opinion.
Jul 31, 2010 at 12:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
You may not get volunteer coaches (although several of the private schools that consistenly show up in Madison for the state basketball tournament seem to be able to find them but do you really need ot pay someone $15-20/hour to run the scoreboard, call lines, move the chains, man the PA system etc?
Jul 31, 2010 at 8:52 a.m.
Suggest removal
billy,
I agree with your idea of volunteer coaches but after about 2 years their won't be an volunteers. Think about how those coaches are treated...Who would volunteer for that? If you can't get volunteers for a youth baseball team how will you find them for a HS sport...especially HS Varsity sport.
.
All that said the pay is minimal so maybe I am COMPLETELY wrong.
Jul 30, 2010 at 4:22 p.m.
Suggest removal
bignik - thanks for sharing. You hit the nail on the head. Sports and other groups/clubs help keep kids in school!
Jul 30, 2010 at 2:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
http://www.wiaawi.org/index.php?id=521
Something many of you should view!
Jul 30, 2010 at 1:47 p.m.
Suggest removal
Here's a thought. Allow people who are willing to volunteer to coach, run the scoreboard, keep the scorebook, call lines a Vball games, run the chains at football games, etc.
Jul 30, 2010 at 11:54 a.m.
Suggest removal
bignik has it right! Just watch how many kids transfer to a school district that has sports!
Jul 30, 2010 at 11 a.m.
Suggest removal
Doc - 2 freshman football teams - light weight and heavy weight (BOYS). 2 frehman volleyball teams - @ Parker they are the Green and Gold teams, @ Craig they are the Blue and White teams (GIRLS).
Jul 30, 2010 at 10:18 a.m.
Suggest removal
What is more important, up to date text books or new balls to play with?
Jul 30, 2010 at 10:06 a.m.
Suggest removal
Doc0430, I understand what you are trying to say, however, too many parents in the this city do not take responsibility in raising their children or watching over them. That is why teachers are more than just teachers in the classroom. Schools do much more today than ever before.
In the end, if you don't have supportive, responsible parents, and then you cut activities, athletics, and programs that give kids a place to go after school, then we will ultimately pay for it in the form of Juvenile Detention or Jail costs. Yes, the families with money will continue to play sports and be in activities, but those that may need the support most will not. You can use the old "We'll have scholorships for the less fortunate," but most times that doesn't work. Many families will pass on a scholarship because they feel embarrassed.
Jul 30, 2010 at 8:11 a.m.
Suggest removal
We do pay a fee in the high schools for our kids to play sports from freshman year to senior year. If your kid plays a sport you pay a fee.
Jul 30, 2010 at 6:49 a.m.
Suggest removal
TJ and doc.............You just don't get it here.......No sports, do you really think little Johnny and Suzie will be going to school in Janeville? You take away athletics, be it Middle School or High School, and then you see how many kids the SDJ loses......Then you can REALLY harp about taxes going up!!
Jul 30, 2010 at 6:12 a.m.
Suggest removal
I'm sorry but I don't see the logic in cutting out essential academic supplies and requiring teachers to take unpaid furlough days yet freshman sports make the cut. The parents that have children involved in these sports should pay a participation fee and make them self-supporting.
Jul 29, 2010 at 11:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
Allfor1and1forAll
Jul 29, 2010 at 10:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
Middle school athletics is crucial in keeping kids off the streets-
No its up to the parents of these kids to be responsible and know what their kids are doing! If they do not want to be responsible then maybe they shouldn't have had kids in the first place. Why is it the taxpayers responsibility to make sure they don't have to watch them and know what they are up to after school?
Jul 29, 2010 at 11:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
Sorry 3rd paragraph, heres how it reads~Football and volleyball each have two freshman teams. One of those freshman teams in each sport was on the chopping block as the school board considered budget cuts Tuesday.
Jul 29, 2010 at 11:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
So according to the first paragraph here, there's a Womens Freshman Football team?? I re-read it 3 times to see if I was imagining things.... When did this start???
Jul 29, 2010 at 10:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
So let me get this straight, the board approved money to save the freshman sport teams, but did not approve middle school textbooks. What is the priority? Apparently it's sports and not education!!!
Jul 29, 2010 at 10:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
Middle school athletics is crucial in keeping kids off the streets and in the classroom. They have five seasons. Charge even $5 or $10 per season and you'd get quite a bit. They currently don't charge anything at the middle school level. This could easily raise $10,000 at each school if $10 was charged for each sport.
Jul 29, 2010 at 7:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
Watch out now for cuts in the so-called "non-revenue" sports. If your kids are involved in tennis, golf, etc. you had better keep your eyes and ears open.
Jul 29, 2010 at 6:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
I know things have to change but increasing or taking away sports is not the answer. It keeps kids busy and out of trouble. Increasing fees would be a hardship for many and a disservice to the kids.
Jul 29, 2010 at 5:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
I feel as though the Board's job is to set the budget and allow those hired and paid by the district to figure out how best to meet that budget. Having the School Board micro manage such things as to whether or not there should be two football teams or a middle school track meet seems silly.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.