Landowners to help fund dredge study

By NEIL JOHNSON ( Contact )   Wednesday, July 28, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Photo

Brian K. Christianson

— Lake Koshkonong landowners will pay $15 more per year to help cover a projected $40,000 shortfall for a study of dredging and building islands in the lake, Rock-Koshkonong Lake District officials said.

Lake district residents voted unanimously in favor of the fee hike during the district’s annual meeting Saturday. It will increase from $35 to $50 the special project charge attached to district residents’ annual tax assessment.

The increase is intended to push forward a $400,000 study by the lake district, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. It’s part of a planning phase for an estimated $4 million to $6 plan to dredge and build islands for erosion control along key shoreline areas at Lake Koshkonong, officials said.

The study originally was slated for completion by October 2010.

Lake district chairman Brian Christianson said officials now hope to finish the dredge study by the end of this year, but he said it likely won’t be in time to capture funding from the DNR and the Army Corps before the two agencies finish their budget year.

Money for the study was supposed to come through an alphabet soup of state appropriations, including an agreement by the DNR for $80,000 in staff time—a pledge matched by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Christianson said as the year drags on and the dredge study remains unfinished, government money has gotten tight. He said the DNR now faces $50,000 in possible staffing and service cutbacks.

“It’s a cash flow situation,” Christianson said.

With the study now about two-thirds finished, Christianson said officials feared stopping to wait for government money.

“This is a huge engineering project. You let it stall out for cash flow reasons, there’s just too many unknowns,” he said.

The lake district’s fee increase will allow the dredge study to continue, with taxpayer funds plugging the shortfall in government funding.

“We didn’t want to shut the engineering projects down and try to restart it in the spring. We asked our taxpayers if we want to see this thing all the way through to the end, and (the fee increase) is what is required,” he said.

Christianson said plans for the project haven’t faltered. He said projects linked to the dredge study, such as a probe of lake sediment this spring by the Army Corps and three public work sessions this summer, have “added to the original timeline” for planning.

Work for the proposed dredge and island project, which Christianson said could cost $4 million to $6 million, remains unfunded and hasn’t been approved by lake district residents or state and federal regulatory agencies.

An experimental dredge and island-building project to test whether a full-scale dredge project would control erosion won’t start until the dredge study is complete.

Although questions over planning, permitting and funding remain, Christianson said residents have proven through their approval of a fee increase that they want the dredge project to move forward.

“The majority of our property owners want to see some dirt being moved. They want to see something tangible being constructed in and around the lake,” he said.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(8)
anotherthought
Jul 29, 2010 at 11:14 p.m.
Suggest removal

We are curious......the price we will all pay for this initial study..........WHO'S PROPERTY will be dredged????? We Think We Know...... No one from Illinois I/B

We ALL suffered through THE FLOOD....and some of us with our 2nd mortgages.
Why and who is bringing this dredgeing to the district at this time!!!

anotherthought
Jul 29, 2010 at 10:50 p.m.
Suggest removal

I may be wrong in my thinking and someone from Illinois please tell me I am wrong ...but.....I suspect and am horrified that the ...

Lake District BOARD ......would take advantage of Illinois people. Why in hell would they do this at this time after the flood??????

anotherthought
Jul 29, 2010 at 10:37 p.m.
Suggest removal

OMG!!!!! First of all..

1. Who decided this project should be brought to the attention of the Lake District...... can anyone answer? (I don't think so)

2. What is the percentage of Illinois people verses Wisconsin people who own property ON THE LAKE? (can anyone answer?)

3. How many people voted on this unanimous decision?

truthbtold
Jul 29, 2010 at 12:11 p.m.
Suggest removal

O.K so is this then going to help with all the submerged junk from the floods? I pay "river view" taxes,(even though the only way I can actually see it is if I sit on the roof top of my two story home and tilt my head to left during a wind storm) But, I do use the lake and river during the summer with the kids for boating. I have lost three props last year alone and that was before July. Since the floods,I have been stuck in submerged piers,fallen trees and god knows what else has floated down and stayed under there...

Long_Time_Gone
Jul 29, 2010 at 9:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

Gandalf - You have absolutely no understanding of the relationship between lakes and rivers and the homes built on the shorelines.
*
By removing the Dam, the property value of those homes would plummet. Your thoughtless idea would drive families into bankruptcy, since mortgages on those homes would likely far surpass the new assessed value given the absence of navigable water.
*
Your removal of the Dam would rob seniors of their retirement nest. Waterfront property remains in high demand and when seniors leave their homes for retirement communities, they realize a very handsome profit on the sale of their shoreline property.
*
And the school districts would be harmed by your careless suggestion of removing the Dam. Lakefront property is valued much higher and taxed much more than a home on Main Street USA. Where will the school districts make-up for lost revenue when high value property disappears?
*
I suspect you would be the first in-line complaining at a local school bard meeting when your tax assessment jumps to make-up the difference caused by your flippant comment to remove the Dam.

woody
Jul 29, 2010 at 9:05 a.m.
Suggest removal

Some history of the lake and dam.
*
http://webpages.charter.net/jsill/Koshko...

Gandalf
Jul 29, 2010 at 8:55 a.m.
Suggest removal

How about removing the Indianford dam and allowing the lake to return to the world-class wetlands and wildlife sanctuary that it should be? Instead tons of good topsoil are eroded and silt-up the lake bottom, blocking natural springs and adversly affecting the water quality downstream.

rprp
Jul 29, 2010 at 7:33 a.m.
Suggest removal

This is money the farmers receive with huge tax breaks, subsidies and many other ways the governments at all levels give the farmers. The other than farmers are paying for this and almost everything else.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT