Delavan stalls Sho-Deen plan

By ANN MARIE AMES ( Contact )   Wednesday, July 21, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Photo

Ryan Simons

Photo

Dorothy Burwell

— The Delavan Town Board on Monday voted twice about plans to develop the Delavan Lake Inlet.

But neither vote propelled the project forward, and the town will take the subject up again next month.

The board voted 3-2 in favor of Sho-Deen Home’s conceptual plan for a 623-home subdivision near County F and Mound Road on the Delavan Lake inlet.

However, board members unanimously voted to send Sho-Deen’s application for a conditional-use permit back to the planning commission for more discussion.

The planning commission on July 6 recommended the board approve the plan and application. The commission provided a list of conditions, including installing a storm water system to ease flooding at the existing Inlet Oaks subdivision, developing a neighborhood park, maintaining a 100-foot “no-touch” buffer zone around wetlands and natural areas, and connecting storm sewers.

But the conditions aren’t “anywhere near all-encompassing of all the issues,” said board member Ryan Simons, who is a member of the planning commission.

Sho-Deen President Dave Patzelt said many of Simons’ concerns would be worked out through the plat approval and developers agreement processes. Other issues are outside the town’s jurisdiction, Patzelt said.

He encouraged the board to take action on the permit application so Sho-Deen would know if it should be “moving forward with this or other options.”

A sticking point for many audience members was the proposed density of the subdivision.

The parcel already is zoned to allow one residence per 15,000 square feet. But Sho-Deen wants to build a conservation subdivision, which would cluster homes on the property and leave contiguous open space.

Sho-Deen proposes building on 10,000-square-foot lots. Patzelt has said the community would benefit from the open space, which would be open to the public.

Many disagreed.

“I’m thinking crowding this amount of density is going to cause problems later on,” said town resident Robert Hoekstra.

Audience members also said the town should not approve the application just so Sho-Deen fixes the flooding issue at Inlet Oaks. An engineering firm has told the town the Sho-Deen property is the right location for a storm water detention pond that would reduce ongoing flooding at Inlet Oaks. Another pond might be necessary on a nearby property, board President Dorothy Burwell said.

If Sho-Deen doesn’t donate the land and build the pond, the town might have to go to court to force Sho-Deen to sell enough property for a pond, she said.

Burwell said in that case, taxpayers would pay for court costs and pond construction.

Inlet Oaks resident Bob Bauer said the town should take care of the flooding issue and not let Sho-Deen hold the issue of flooding over the town’s head.

WHAT’S NEXT?

The Delavan Town Board on Tuesday voted to send Sho-Deen’s application for a conditional-use permit back to the town plan commission. The next plan commission meeting is scheduled for 7 p.m. Tuesday, Aug. 3. If the commission forwards a recommendation, it could be addressed at the committee of the whole meeting at 6 p.m. Monday, Aug. 9. If approved at that time, the application could be on the next Walworth County Zoning Agency agenda. The next scheduled meeting for the agency is 4 p.m. Thursday, Aug. 19.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(4)
rdpro
Jul 22, 2010 at 11:31 a.m.
Suggest removal

Personally, I think anything that will put people to work right now is a good thing. Of course if you are working and get a regular paycheck it may not seem that way.

worriedcitizen
Jul 22, 2010 at 9:16 a.m.
Suggest removal

this economy is already bad and houses aren't selling,so who is going to buy these homes? Now is not the time to be addressing new housing, let's take care of the properties already out there.

carharttmom
Jul 22, 2010 at 7:51 a.m.
Suggest removal

Here is an idea....instead of building 623 more homes in Delavan Township, why don't they worry about the homes that are already in foreclosure or have been up for sale for quite some time taken care of first then worry about building a ton of new houses. Not rocket science here.....

cynicaleye
Jul 21, 2010 at 4:39 p.m.
Suggest removal

Good first step. Now vote the entire project down.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT