Walworth County wants public input on board size

By ANN MARIE AMES ( Contact )   Tuesday, July 20, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Reader pollAudio

Do you think voters would approve an increase in the number of members on the Walworth County Board?

  

See the results and comments

Photo

David Bretl

IF YOU GO


What: Walworth County Board regular meeting

When: 6 p.m. Tuesday, Aug. 10.

Where: Walworth County Government Center, 100 W. Walworth St., Elkhorn.

What’s on the agenda: The county hopes to get input about the possibility of increasing the size of the county board. The board also could recommend whether to continue funding the Walworth County Economic Development Alliance.

— Walworth County officials hope the public will engage in a new discussion about the size of the county board.

The Walworth County Executive Committee on Monday sent the matter to the full county board for discussion in August. The committee did not make a recommendation.

Instead, committee members hoped members of the public would attend the board meeting and weigh in, Administrator Dave Bretl said.

A letter written earlier this month by board member Jerry Grant sparked the conversation. Grant wrote that when the federal census results are available, the time will be ripe to consider increasing the size of the board.

In 2007, voters cut the board from 25 members to 11.

The small board size means a large workload for board members, Grant said. The change was the result of a binding referendum petitioned for by a citizens group.

At the time, the change was hotly debated by elected officials and members of the public.

In an interview last week with the Gazette, Bretl said the board might be able to propose new districts by December 2011.

The process would include public hearings and input from municipalities.

Once the new districts are set, the law would only allow board sizes to be reduced—not increased—until the 2020 census, Bretl said.

WCEDA funding gets tentative nod

The executive committee on Monday also gave tentative approval up to the future of the county’s largest business association.

The committee voted 3-1 in favor of continuing to give money to the Walworth County Economic Development Alliance, Administrator Dave Bretl said.

But the vote is advisory, and it’s a long time until budget season, Bretl said in a phone interview.

The county has been giving $50,000 annually to the alliance. The committee’s recommendation will go to the full county board in August. The board could make a recommendation about the money to Bretl.

Committee member Dan Kilkenny voted against funding the alliance.

Walworth County Economic Development Alliance President Kim Howarth said the group’s purpose would change drastically if it lost the county funds.

The alliance works to foster economic growth in the county. It also administers a $500,000 revolving loan fund for small or new businesses and manages a $685,000 training grant for aspiring entrepreneurs.

The alliance was formed in 2005.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(4)
AdjunctProf
Oct 25, 2010 at 12:03 p.m.
Suggest removal

Dear County Board Supervisors,
If the job is too hard, then resign your seat. Fewer members means each Supervisor serves on more committees and becomes more familiar with a variety of county operations. That is a good thing, versus the opposite of a light workload and never getting the big picture of everything the County does.

getitright
Jul 21, 2010 at 12:05 p.m.
Suggest removal

We voted on this already. The Board they have now is good enough.

delavan
Jul 21, 2010 at 10:49 a.m.
Suggest removal

Damit.We voted on this and was passed to cut the board members down.If the ones on there now cant do there jobs then get them out of there.

janesvillean
Jul 20, 2010 at 4:46 p.m.
Suggest removal

As I've said before, my ideal board size would be one that grants each incorporated municipality and surroundings at least one member, as district balancing allows. Without doing anything fancy, I count a need for at least 18. This may be an arbitrary rule of thumb, but it's much less arbitrary than just making it 11 and hoping for the best. The concept that too many board members costs the county money is absurd.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT