Prosecution offers motive for triple homicide

By TED SULLIVAN   Friday, Jan. 29, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Podcast Episode


WCLO's Steve Benton reports on Thursday's events at Rock County's triple homicide trial.

RSS   

— For the first time in the Janesville triple homicide trial, the prosecution offered a motive for the Lentz family slayings.

Kenneth Erdmann, James Koepp’s former cellmate, said Koepp admitted to killing Danyetta Lentz and her teenage children, Nicole and Scott, because he didn’t want his wife to know about his affair with Danyetta.

Erdmann testified Koepp's confessions came during private conversations while they were cellmates at Columbia Correctional Institution.

The defense attempted to discredit Erdmann’s claims.

Erdmann admitted he tried to get information from Koepp to offer it to the prosecution in exchange for a lighter prison sentence.

He also admitted he wanted to get moved into a minimum-security prison with more freedoms.

District Attorney David O’Leary called several witnesses in the fourth day of Koepp’s trial in Rock County Court, including Erdmann and others suggesting Koepp was guilty.

Koepp, 51, faces three charges of first-degree intentional homicide in the January 2007 killings.

The defense claims Koepp was in the Lentz home the night of the murders but left before the slayings.

Jailhouse confession

Erdmann said Koepp told him the Lentz family was eating pizza before the murders.

“He told me that was amusing because that was going to be their last meal,” Erdmann said, later adding, "The impression that I got was he was bragging about it.”

Rock County sheriff’s detective Richard Kamholz, who searched the Lentz home, testified later in the day he found a receipt for a pizza Danyetta had purchased the night of the murders.

Erdmann, a Latin King gang member, is serving 25 years in prison for felony aggravated battery and felony first-degree reckless injury. He and Koepp often talked about Koepp’s case, Erdmann said.

Koepp told Erdmann he strangled the Lentzes from behind and stabbed them. He bragged about manhandling Danyetta, a 200-pound woman compared to Koepp’s 140-pound frame, Erdmann said.

Koepp told Erdmann the only evidence against him was the victims’ blood on his clothing, Erdmann said.

“He kept telling me he wants to get back with his wife if he beats this,” Erdmann said.

O'Leary never offered to help Erdmann in exchange for his testimony in Koepp's case, Erdmann said.

The inmate never received a reduced prison sentence or prison transfer.

Erdmann said he was risking his life by testifying because he could be labeled as a jailhouse snitch.

So, why testify against Koepp?

“I felt that the family needs closure, and if I was in that situation, I would love for somebody to come forward,” Erdmann said.

Cold stare

Todd Harrington, Koepp’s former cellmate and childhood friend, testified he also had conversations with Koepp about the case.

One particular conversation gave Harrington chills.

After asking Koepp why no one witnessed the murders, Koepp gave him a cold, long stare and said the witnesses were dead, Harrington said.

“It caught me entirely off guard,” he said.

The comment was made in an unusual tone that was unlike Koepp, Harrington said.

During cross-examination, Harrington said Koepp also denied committing the murders.

Mysterious button

Sheriff's detective Warren Yoerger said a button of evidentiary value was found at the homicide scene.

Investigators, however, never discovered who owned the button, he said.

The button is significant because the defense claims an unknown robber killed the Lentz family.

The button was not linked to Koepp, Yoerger said.

Sheriff’s detective Richard Kamholz testified he spoke with Koepp at his home after the homicide. He said Koepp offered to give him clothes he wore the night of the murders.

The clothes had bloodstains, which were later linked to the victims’ DNA, prosecutors said.

Koepp denied being at the Lentz home the night of the homicides, but detectives didn’t believe him, they said.

Before the murders, Nicole had told her boyfriend on the phone that “Jim” was over, a detective said.

Sheriff’s detective Daria O’Connor said Koepp left a voicemail with his brother after the murders. She said Koepp was crying and saying he didn’t intend to hurt anyone.

High-speed chase

Koepp was supposed to be interviewed a second time four days after the murders, but he didn’t show up.

Koepp called a detective, crying and saying, “I was stupid. I was stupid,” Kamholz said.

Koepp then fled when deputies tried to stop him in his vehicle, sheriff’s deputy Bryan Hanthorn said.

Koepp drove around a roadblock and down the wrong side of a highway, he said.

Stop sticks were used to flatten Koepp’s tires, and Koepp eventually stopped, Hanthorn said.

Phone call with police

During the chase, Koepp called his wife.

Janesville police officer Denise Stutika was at Koepp’s home. She answered Koepp’s wife’s phone.

A recording of the phone call was played in court.

Stutika told Koepp to stop his car. Koepp kept asking to talk to his wife, but the officer wouldn’t let him. Koepp wanted to tell his wife he loved her. He was distressed and worried.

Koepp also said he didn’t kill anyone, yet he was worried he would be charged anyway.

Koepp told the officer that investigators had hairs, fingerprints and his clothes.

“Everything is going against me,” Koepp said.

Later, a detective photographed small cuts on Koepp’s head, hands, wrists and lower legs, Kamholz said. He also had a softball-sized bruise on his left knee.

Koepp was arrested five days after the murders.

He is in prison serving a sentence for felony fleeing stemming from the chase.

Koepp’s two-week murder trial is scheduled to continue through next week.

If convicted, he faces three life sentences.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(13)
newsjunkie86
Feb 7, 2010 at 12:35 p.m.
Suggest removal

If you don't know anything about the people involved, then you probably shouldn't comment on these because you just sound like you're on some kind of power trip. Not all the inmates or so called convicts took plea deals for testifying. Some of them did just testify becaues they were asked, and they thought it was the right thing to do. He was found guilty by the jury, so maybe these testimonies didn't have as much weight as one thinks. I agree that he did not have too many people in his circle, so of course the prosecution is going to grab any so called yahoo they can. Let's go insult some people that actually deserve it.

catdog
Feb 2, 2010 at 5:02 p.m.
Suggest removal

If the prosecutors believe ANYTHING these two yahoos say, then the justice system will take 200 yrs. off the credability of ANY witness. Of course these guys are gonna' say anything they can. As a convict, that's their JOB!! Lie, cheat,or steal your way to get a lighter sentence or easier living conditions.And if the jurors believe the cons' song and dance, then you can bet Koepp won't get a fair trial at all!!

jvillerdr
Feb 1, 2010 at 4:47 p.m.
Suggest removal

Rush to judgment? Just because we're not all on the jury doesn't mean we can't have opinions based on the evidence that is being presented. We all have a legitimate interest in and the right to opinions about the goings-on in criminal proceedings, even if only the jury ultimately decides guilt or innocence.

ladulce
Jan 29, 2010 at 5:20 p.m.
Suggest removal

johnhenry- If you doubt the police, then, any case is "fair game" for suspicion. Yes, I know there are corrupt officers everywhere, but, this guy- calling into work and telling them about the crime scene, telling the officers he didn't mean to kill anyone, fleeing when he was supposed to meet with police.... IN ADDITION to the DNA under the nails , the nick tie, their blood on HIS clothing, etc. etc. screams guilt to me. There could be a "conspiracy" here, but, more likely, it keeps pointing back to him. The ONLY way that one can be 100% certain would be to have an eyewitness, and, even then people would be questioning their accuracy. The evidence (physical) doesn't lie, and, neither do his comments to police and family members. OJ got away with it by pointing the finger at police, only to later right a book called, "HOW I did it." and to brag on national TV about getting away with murder. This isn't justice. The Lentz family deserves more than that.

johnhenry
Jan 29, 2010 at 5:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

ladulce- If the victims had Koepp's DNA under their fingernails, I'll admit that's pretty convincing. But has no one besides me ever heard of a case where maybe not every cop was a saint? Maybe the greater good was served by arresting someone so soon after the crimes happened, so that the good people of Jville could sleep at night. It just seems to me that every investigator that had anything to do with the case had their prayers answered when it turned out that a registered sex offender lived two doors away, and no one has looked any further. The family of the victims deserves the truth, and I'm not convinced they are going to get it from this trial. P.S. An honest thank you to all the men and women of law enforcement, doing their best for their communities every day

johnhenry
Jan 29, 2010 at 4:54 p.m.
Suggest removal

packersfan1>> The defense doesn't have to PROVE anything! The prosecution has to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that it was Koepp, acting alone, that comitted these murders. That's what the whole point of our justice system is supposed to be. Without it, you and your buddies would be running the streets with lanterns and pitchforks, looking for the next one you "know" is "guilty"

ljs64
Jan 29, 2010 at 4:28 p.m.
Suggest removal

The Rush to Judgement crowd of Rock County.

frogger
Jan 29, 2010 at 4:02 p.m.
Suggest removal

This button they found. So what it could belong to anybody who was in that trailer in the last year or more if she isn't a really good house cleaner. WHERE was this button found?

Packersfan- yes a robber would have definitely picked up those gift cards. Not sure those can be traced. I know if you lose one you are sol. Dump a purse and not take the easy stuff? NOT. Don't most burglar(s) try to avoid conflict. If they were there and he was caught stealing I don't think he would have BRUTALLY stabbed over and over , before and after death, and moved them. He would have just RAN.

jvillerdr
Jan 29, 2010 at 3:49 p.m.
Suggest removal

These witnesses may not be the most upstanding members of the community, but at least one of them is described as a childhood friend and is therefore someone Koepp obviously chose to associate with. From what has been reported about him it seems doubtful there are too many respectable people in his circle of close acquaintances.

packersfan1
Jan 29, 2010 at 10:38 a.m.
Suggest removal

There's no way the defense can prove that a robbery took place. There were earrings left and Danyetta's credit card was still left next to her purse. Then there's that button they found at the scene. No one else could have killed them. Koepp is guilty.

ladulce
Jan 29, 2010 at 8:42 a.m.
Suggest removal

More solid than that? Well, let's see- a couple days ago it came out that more than one victim had his DNA under their fingernails. I don't think that is easily explainable, nor is it that one of his neck ties were used in the murders, or that their blood was on his clothing (that he admitted wearing that evening).... That sounds like the PRIMARY evidence to me.... The jail guy, just someone with knowledge direct from Koepp's mouth. Whether you believe HIS testimony or not, the other details seem pretty clear and convincing.

johnhenry
Jan 29, 2010 at 8:31 a.m.
Suggest removal

Am I the only one who thinks that these so called "friends" of Koepp's may have been made some kind of offer for reduced time, or better work assignment, in exchange for their testimony against him? The prosecution had him sitting for 3 years. I would think they could have come up with something a little more solid than that.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT