IRA conversion could cost in the end

By JIM LEUTE ( Contact )   Thursday, Jan. 14, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— As a certified financial planner, Dave Miser was particularly interested in the newspaper story about Individual Retirement Accounts.

The article, authored by a MarketWatch reporter and published in the Marketplace section of Sunday’s Gazette, focused on a new federal law that allows all Americans—not just those with modified adjusted gross incomes of less than $100,000—to convert their traditional IRAs to Roth IRAs.

While Miser believed the article was well done and informative, he found one problem.

“It doesn’t work in Wisconsin,” said Miser, whose office is at Mid America Bank in Janesville.

The new federal rules allow people of all income levels to convert traditional IRAs to the Roth IRAs, which offer an advantage of tax-free withdrawals.

Miser said Wisconsin didn’t adopt the federal rule. That means investors who make conversions could pay an initial penalty of as much as 5.3 percent of the money they transfer and 2 percent a year from then on.

Gov. Jim Doyle recommended last year that the state adopt the new federal rules, but the state’s budget-writing committee opted to make Wisconsin the only state not to do so.

Miser said a barrage of advertisements has tried to persuade investors to convert to Roth IRAs. But few people know of Wisconsin’s position on the IRA tax implications.

“Not everyone uses a certified financial planner, and when you call the 800-number, it’s not mentioned that Wisconsin is alone on this,” he said.

“The state thinks it can collect a lot of taxes this way, but it’s just the wrong way to do it,” he said. “It’s kind of sneaky.”

Miser said hearings are under way in Madison on retirement account taxation, but action could be months away.

In the meantime, he urges people to contact their lawmakers.

“Wisconsin savers planning for retirement should not be penalized for the same transactions and amounts that people in other states can accomplish penalty-free,” he said.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(11)
JustAskMe
Jan 16, 2010 at 8:22 a.m.
Suggest removal

If you don't convert to a Roth IRA, you pay your taxes way down the road - when you take money out of the traditional IRA.

JustAskMe
Jan 16, 2010 at 8:20 a.m.
Suggest removal

When converting to a Roth IRA, you are paying your taxes sooner than later.

coffeeman
Jan 16, 2010 at 8:05 a.m.
Suggest removal

AS long as you pay federal income tax each year, you are NEVER done paying for ANYTHING the Federal Government wants to fund. This has never changed.

JustAskMe
Jan 16, 2010 at 7:56 a.m.
Suggest removal

Wisconsin is being fiscally responsible by not granting any additional tax break.

JustAskMe
Jan 16, 2010 at 7:52 a.m.
Suggest removal

The new federal rules are a way for the federal govt to bring-in a large amount of cash from the taxpayers, as soon as possible. And you thought the taxpayer was done paying for this financial crisis mess?

RoadKing
Jan 15, 2010 at 12:01 p.m.
Suggest removal

Wisconsin taxpayers always get it "in the end".

stoutt66
Jan 15, 2010 at 9:20 a.m.
Suggest removal

The only reason this rule is in place is to let the people who normally cannot convert their funds into the Roth IRA because they make too much income to have one anyway. Some people make too much money to put funds into Roth IRA's so they were never an option to have. This rule would allow them to have money in the Roth account after they convert and pay the taxes. But here our stupid state has decided to be the rebel.

garyprimer
Jan 14, 2010 at 6:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

I just got newsletter from a fund that mentions Roth IRA conversions and it appears that there is a tax payment associated with a conversion. It just proves the "too good to be true" rule. At least with this one, I can stand in the sidelines. ;-)

garyprimer
Jan 14, 2010 at 5:46 p.m.
Suggest removal

I have had a Roth IRA account for a number of years and made maximum contributions. In doing so, I was not able to take the tax advantage offered with a traditional IRA. I traded that for the advantage of tax-free withdrawals in the future. Now the federal government is going to grant those advantages to everyone. Imagine that! Getting screwed by the federal government and the IRS! Wow, I guess that life is not fair...

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT