A dearth of enigma

By KATHLEEN PARKER   Wednesday, Feb. 3, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— My favorite thing about J.D. Salinger wasn’t his seminal work—or his most famous character, Holden Caulfield—but how little I knew of him, thanks to his relentless pursuit of privacy.

It’s the same thing I also love about two other favorite writers, both, coincidentally, great Southern dames—Harper Lee and Florence King. The former, Pulitzer Prize-winning author of “To Kill a Mockingbird,” has declined most interview requests since the 1960 publication of the novel.

Her recorded public ventures have included judging an annual high school essay-writing contest sponsored by the University of Alabama. She also visited Washington in 2007 to receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Otherwise, to fans’ kind invitations to be interviewed, Lee has written personal notes, declining.

Similarly, King, whose witty, erudite and often laugh-out-loud essays and books have amused readers for decades, shuns the glare of appreciation. She is known to communicate by snail mail with a select few, and even to e-mail occasionally, but is not one to open the door should someone summon the audacity to knock.

Some of King’s funniest pieces pertain to her avoidance of fans, but her best musings concern what we charitably refer to as “American culture.” To wit: “Time has lost all meaning in that nightmare alley of the Western world known as the American mind.”

In the days since Salinger’s death at age 91, much has been written about all we didn’t know about him. So mysterious was he that at times during his 30-year silence, it was easy to wonder whether he was still alive. Given the breathless pace of breaking news, we scarcely have time to note a death, much less to mourn the loss. There’s something awry in the rat race when one wonders two days after a fact whether it’s too late to write about it.

Now we wonder: Did Salinger leave behind a trove? Are there new Holden Caulfields to discover? Notebooks of cultural criticism? Can we finally possess his thoughts after so many years of being denied entrance to his private sanctum?

I am not immune to the hope that other works will surface. At this point, cocktail napkin doodles will do. We shall read, and we shall be moved to gladness or sadness, but by Salinger, we will be moved.

But by Andrew Young? Not so much.

Young, by now unavoidable, is the former (and formerly devoted) aide to John Edwards who has just added a new tome to that best-selling genre, the tell-all. Publication of “The Politician” happened to coincide with Salinger’s death, thus prompting the inevitable detour into the dot-connecting abyss of King’s aforementioned nightmare alley.

No reluctant famer, that Young fellow.

Of course, few writers—whether they pen fiction or nonfiction—can afford to be as mysterious as Salinger or King or Lee. The saturated book market demands that even the most private of authors subject themselves to the gantlet of a book tour, if they’re lucky enough to land one, and to schmoozing with potential book buyers.

Still, how far we have come from the days of admiring a reclusive writer who sought shelter from the corrosive effects of fame to celebrating a typist—as Truman Capote once described “On the Road” author Jack Kerouac—whose motives are only fame, the attendant lucre and, increasingly, political status.

Young tells all, he claims, for the integrity of the public record, even though Edwards is a contender for nothing and is, by any measure, already a ruined man. But partly, Young admits, he wrote the book for the money. Do tell. We are supposed to embrace as virtue Young’s assertion that he has declined “gigantic” sums of money offered for a sex tape he claims to possess of Edwards and his mistress.

Obviously, absolute privacy for politicians isn’t tenable, or even desirable, to the same degree that a writer of books might deserve or demand. In a broader sense, however, the extent to which we feel entitled to another’s private life, disregarding collateral damage to others, is a pox on all our houses.

As we mourn the death of an author who prized personal space above fame and fortune, we might also mourn the dearth of enigma. Ultimately, respecting another’s privacy is an act of self-respect, of which we have too little. Alas, for good reason.

Kathleen Parker is a columnist for the Orlando Sentinel. Her e-mail address is kathleenparker@washpost.com.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(4)
gazettefan
Feb 3, 2010 at 3:43 p.m.
Suggest removal

thekid, I'm not saying he didn't write, but I doubt if any of it will be good. Modern literary work is highly personal, what could he have written about that would reflect the American experience in the last 60 years? His books would have to be sourced in other books and other publications and so be very derivative. What could he genuinely write about if he was a hermit since Catcher?

I've heard this business of him writing solely for his own enjoyment. Is this believable? Was his purpose to write the rest of his life while avoiding everything else associated with being a writer only to have his books read after his death? We'll see.

thekid3477
Feb 3, 2010 at 2:50 p.m.
Suggest removal

gfan i read that he wrote frequently in his seclusion, for his entertainment mostly, and that there may be a 16 or 17 books left unpublished. i dont recall where i saw that, but it was just after his death. the words 'phony' and 'dough' are used in my vocab frequently because of holden:)

gazettefan
Feb 3, 2010 at 2:16 p.m.
Suggest removal

Gee, what possible reason could there be for Salinger's half-century-plus of literary non-productivity?! Let's see: How 'bout, save for a few relatively minor works, Catcher In the Rye was all he had!!! The alienation was an intentional or inadvertent marketing ploy for his one good book -and quite consistent with the alienation of Holden Caufield.

Add that he had a penchant for females inappropriately younger than he, and everything is explained about his lack of literary productivity and his life-long alienation from the world.

Don't expect to find any literary gems stacked in his closet.

SuperDave
Feb 3, 2010 at 1:35 p.m.
Suggest removal

Plenty of enigma to go around, in this article alone!

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT