Bloomfield meets incorporation deadline

By KEVIN HOFFMAN   Wednesday, Dec. 29, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Photo

Photo

Ken Monroe

— Bloomfield's latest shot at incorporation could face fewer objections from neighboring communities after town officials shed nearly 3,700 acres from its proposal.

Town Chairman Ken Monroe said Monday he forwarded the application to the county for review last week—10 days before its Dec. 30 filing deadline. The town was required to obtain a petition with 75 signatures, and Monroe said he received about 82.

Bloomfield has made five unsuccessful attempts since 1992 to incorporate from a town into a village. Its last try this summer was rejected after the state Department of Administration determined the 12,000-acre proposal was too large.

Another problem was objection petitions from Lake Geneva and Genoa City, which both told the state they stood only against the size of incorporation. Monroe said he doesn't expect any interference from Genoa City this time, but Lake Geneva's position is unclear.

The state Incorporation Review Board recommended the town reapply with smaller boundaries. It said previous plans would have divided the area into four pieces, harming "community identity and (making) service provisions more difficult."

Now that the boundaries are pulled in, chances might be as good as ever for the petition to succeed. Even so, Monroe remains cautious.

"The last two times I thought we had a good chance," he said. "So this time I'll back off and just say, 'I hope.'"

The new proposal seeks to incorporate about 8,375 acres, an area 30 percent smaller than the proposal rejected last summer. If approved, neighboring communities would no longer be able to annex land in Bloomfield.

The state board ruled earlier this year Bloomfield wouldn't have to pay the $20,000 application fee if it filed papers by Oct. 12. That deadline was extended to Dec. 30 once the town displayed that it was serious about changing its plan, Monroe said.

If the town had been forced to pay another fee, it's unlikely it would come back for another try, Monroe said.

A Walworth County judge must clear the application before it's forwarded to the state. That could come in January or February.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(1)
janesvillean
Dec 29, 2010 at 5:07 p.m.
Suggest removal

I'm not a big fan of these township incorporations, but paring down the footprint helps a great deal. In theory they are protecting themselves from development, but in reality they often simply set in stone rural sprawl and waste of valuable agricultural land and open space. Thus a more compact village is better.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT