Council to consider annual garbage collection fee

By ANN MARIE AMES ( Contact )   Saturday, Aug. 7, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— A $40 annual fee for each Janesville household could be the fix for a projected budget gap in the city’s trash disposal fund.

The Janesville City Council on Monday will hear a report from city staff on ways to avoid losing money while collecting and disposing garbage and recyclables.

The city’s sanitation fund is projected to operate at a loss of up to $1.2 million annually between 2010 and 2013, the report states.

In a May study session, council members identified five issues that needed more review.

The council Monday could direct staff to continue researching or could have an item put on a future agenda for action, City Manager Eric Levitt said. The council will not vote to increase fees or change any landfill-related ordinances Monday.

Here are the issues and suggestions from the staff, according to the report:

A trash collection user fee: If the council decides at a future meeting to implement a trash collection and disposal user fee, city staff recommends a flat fee rather than one based on the amount of trash generated by a household.

Staff members recommend a fee of $10 per quarter per household. That would generate $1.32 million to cover the cost of collecting and disposing trash.

The city assumed that trash would be collected from 23,700 households, which would make the estimated quarterly cost of collection and disposal $13.95 per household per year.

Staff members also recommend the city keep offering collection services for businesses and require businesses to participate. The city allows businesses to dispose of up to 90 gallons of waste weekly. No record is available of how many businesses subscribe to the service, but the number is low.

Single-stream recycling: Staff members recommend the city continue to require residents to separate paper from other recyclable materials to maximize revenues in the next year.

If residents could toss all recyclable materials in one bin, it could encourage more recycling and decrease the amount of recyclable material that ends up in the city’s landfill.

But it also would reduce the amount of money the city makes selling recyclable material.

If the council wants to switch to single-stream collection, now is the time to look into it. The city’s recycling trucks are due for replacement in 2011.

The conversion would require about $1.9 million for equipment costs.

Verifying the residency of landfill users: The staff recommends the city not use a sticker system to identify residents. Instead, discretion would be left to landfill attendants.

City residents are allowed to dispose of up to 60 gallons of waste at no cost and are allowed to use the city’s compost facility. Some people are concerned that non-residents are taking advantage of the system.

The city used a free sticker system prior to 1992, but the system was burdensome and didn’t prevent abuse of dumping privileges.

Every-other-week trash collection: City staff recommends the city continue trash collection every week. Every-other-week collection would results in a 22 percent savings, but that probably wouldn’t make up for customer dissatisfaction.

Most communities that pick up trash only twice per month pick up compostable materials such as food and yard waste separately and weekly.

Decreasing the amount of waste accepted: Staff recommends renewing through 2011 the disposal contracts with waste haulers who dump at the landfill. In addition, staff recommends starting in 2012 to reduce the amount of waste accepted.

In 2009, the city’s landfill accepted 220,850 tons of waste. Of the 11 commercial and municipal waste sources listed, the city of Janesville ranked sixth by tonnage.

If the landfill accepted no more than approximately 170,000 tons of waste per year, the life of the operating landfill and extension area would be extended until 2045.

More research is needed to see if it is feasible to reduce the amount of waste intake by that much.

On the agenda

The Janesville City Council will meet in special session at 5 p.m. Monday in City Hall, 18 N. Jackson St. to talk about how to cover a projected budget shortage for the city’s waste collection program.

The regular council meeting is scheduled for 7 p.m. in the same location.

Items on the agenda include:

n A resolution to give input on a proposed plan to preserve farmland in Rock County. This fall, the Rock County Board could approve a program that would permanently prevent development on eligible farmland. Called PACE, or purchase of agricultural conservation easement, the program would pay farmers for the value of their land.

Brad Cantrell, Janesville’s community development director, said he supports the program but that some such easements could limit the city’s growth. The council could vote on a resolution asking for concessions in the county program.

Imagine three rings around the city. The first ring is closest to the city and is labeled “future growth.” It is intended for expansion in the next 30 years.

The county committee has excluded properties in that ring from PACE.

The city has designated the second ring as “urban reserve” for growth beyond 30 years. Cantrell thinks properties in that ring also should be ineligible for PACE.

The resolution makes an exception for 1,400 acres on Janesville’s southeast side that are in both the urban reserve and the PACE target area.

“We’ll recognize that as the best of the best (farmland),” Cantrell told the Gazette. “But the other areas that are not the prime, that are not recognized in that fashion, should be ineligible for the program. Those will have potential pressures for future urban growth.”

The resolution also seeks to allow the city to comment on PACE applications in a third ring where the city has extraterritorial plat review jurisdiction.

If council members approve the resolution, the city would ask that the program allow for city comments when property owners in the outer ring apply for PACE. The city also should get to comment on applications for properties in the 1,400-acre area that falls in both the PACE target designation and the city’s urban reserve designation, the release states.

n Approval of a five-year contract with Janesville Youth Hockey Club to run the concession stand at Janesville Ice Skating Center on Beloit Avenue. Council members had some concerns about the contract at a July 26 meeting. To address the concerns, City Manager Eric Levitt proposes the city get either 12.5 percent of net sales or 9 percent of gross sales. In either case, the minimum payment would be $5,000. Based on the club’s sales last year, 12.5 percent of net sales would be $3,600. Requiring more than $3,600 could negatively affect prices at the concession stand, Levitt wrote. The club uses the money to avoid increasing player fees and to provide scholarships.

n A vote on safety improvements on Milwaukee Street between Highway 14 and Wright Road, the site where a bike tunnel had been proposed. The council in June talked about options at a study session. Council members expressed a preference for a plan that would eliminate two lanes of traffic and add a center refuge for bicyclists and pedestrians. Signal lights would be upgraded and a bike path and turn lane would be added. During the study session, council members asked for more information about in-pavement lighting and an automated warning light system.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(45)
TJRockCounty
Aug 10, 2010 at 6:25 a.m.
Suggest removal

Not to get off the subject but there are numerous mentions of the Council's support of the Ice Arena. I'm wondering if the Council's decision is swayed by the fact that the owners of the ice hockey team are all area businessmen in the construction business?

ladulce
Aug 9, 2010 at 10:27 p.m.
Suggest removal

$40 a year breaks down to slightly under $3.50 per month. Is it really a big deal? I agree that the ice arena idea is ridiculous! And, personally after this misuse of funds, believe that we should vote out the entire group, but, is $40 annually really a big deal? Every other week pick up would be a nightmare, and taking it to the landfill myself is surely going to cost more than 80 cents a week in gas and time spent.

dkush21
Aug 9, 2010 at 10 p.m.
Suggest removal

gonefishin: It took 8 years to destroy this country, what makes you think that it can be fixed in 1-1/2 years? Like I said, if you think you can do better, why don't you run for president? Whether, it be a Republican or Democrat President, it will be a long time till things get any better. There are things that Obama does that I like and things that I dislike. I'm not a fool, because I know that it will take a long time to fix the mess we are in right now, if it can be fixed. Fools are people who think that everything will be fixed right away. I wonder who that would be?

frogger
Aug 9, 2010 at 11:04 a.m.
Suggest removal

We will "consider" firing all of you for spending money we do not have but NOBODY else will apply for the job.

frogger
Aug 9, 2010 at 10:55 a.m.
Suggest removal

PARK PLACE NEWS FEB 2008
I am tired of hearing we don't pay for trash pick up-
"Sanitation – Encompasses trash and recycling collection and disposal programs, including waste, tire and appliance
recycling, management of sanitary and demolition landfills and compost facility and twice-yearly yard waste collection.
Program costs are also paid for by user fees, such as sanitary landfill and drop-off fees. $13.45 $1.12"


When I brought this up to City Council they said "this is a misprint" WHATEVER!!!

http://www.ci.janesville.wi.us/Library/P...

frogger
Aug 9, 2010 at 10:43 a.m.
Suggest removal

tjrockcounty- the city doesn't pick up apartment building garbage. This is hired out.
I think every other week would be good. I don't want to pay $40 a year. An apartment building owner lets me dump in the dumpster. God bless him. Thanks.

SarahB1
Aug 9, 2010 at 8:22 a.m.
Suggest removal

RoadKing: LOL! Thank you for my first laugh of the day.

RoadKing
Aug 9, 2010 at 7 a.m.
Suggest removal

Isn't the garbage fee the council members and city managers salaries?

yada
Aug 9, 2010 at 6:24 a.m.
Suggest removal

A $40.00 fee - interesting idea...instead - how about not spending millions on ice arena. Wake up and look at the economy please.

woodyman77
Aug 9, 2010 at 12:39 a.m.
Suggest removal

Did I just read , 2 articles that say the city is spending 2 million on an ice arena? What? another said that the youthsports complex is addind softball diamonds for 1.2 million? are you kidding me? city services and education are struggling so badly and the city is blowing money on recreation? Fire everyone of the council members, they are spending like drunken sailors. dont blame obama, you dont have to look that far, my god that is so outrageous i want to go protest at the council meetings, even if i go by myself. what a joke, who could possibly advocate such wates of taxpayer dollars when there are much more pressing needs in our community. who? could some one answer this for me because i would like to talk to them pesrsonally and give them a piece of my mind.

woodyman77
Aug 9, 2010 at 12:30 a.m.
Suggest removal

I will say this though, Obama bashing on an article about raising trash fees in Janesville, Wi 40 bucks, that is pricelessly stupid. only in a town with "redneck fest". Absolutely hilarious! Seriously?

woodyman77
Aug 9, 2010 at 12:28 a.m.
Suggest removal

Everyother week doesnt work for us, twin babies. Get it my garage would smell so bad i cant even explain. plus cutting up bluegills/walleyes? my neighbors would smell it! Leave partisan politics out of this idiots. it is just old rhetoric and im tired of it, you make no sense. speak to the trashpickup. i personally would rather take my own trash to the dump once a week. I am for choice. To rockenvironetwork, um trash isnt included in our taxes? hello, they are city workers, that means they get govt checks, which means.....drumroll..... they are paid by some sort of tax that we all pay. my gosh are you kidding me? what i love is some people are fine with a 40 dollar garbage fee, 15-30% water price hikes, but there is no WAY on this earth that they would ever get behind a small tax levy to make sure the schools are proprely funded. some in this city are a friggin joke. "I shouldnt have to pay for anything , govt is spending too much, waaahhhh!!!" , seriously you tax whiners make my head hurt. 40 bucks for trash? another 40-50bucks for water? maybe 100 bucks fore schools? so like another say 200 bucks a year in taxes and fees to ensure that janesville is a quality place to live? no problems here. i wish that some of the tax whiners would move to loow tax states like oklahoma, or louisiana and tell me what the quality of life is there. terrible, no services or bad ones anyways, lowly ranked education, and unsanitary water. you want to know the worst places to live in this country line it up next to the list of the lowest taxed states, bet youll find some real similarities. I personally am tired of the garbage men taking like a half hour break in front of my house. other than that they are fine and so is the city, they are doing what they can with what theyve got, considering GM left we are doing much better than a lot of other cities that have lost car plants.

Irish_Mafia78
Aug 9, 2010 at 12:12 a.m.
Suggest removal

Garbage and recycling collection is included in my rent. If I were a home owner, I'd find a way to budget in $40 a year. It sounds reasonable.

$10 per quarter is hardly a hardship when you see people spending almost that much per day on Starbucks, cigarettes, fast food and other non-essentials. I'm not trying to start a fight, I'm just telling you what I see. I know not everyone drinks expensive coffees, smokes or eats out daily but it kinda puts it into perspective how easily $10 could be saved. Yes, it's hard times for some. Yes, that $40 could make the difference between buying some groceries or fueling a vehicle... but it could be done.

jv92
Aug 8, 2010 at 10:23 p.m.
Suggest removal

I've been there twice since the last blog on here made a stink about them not checking IDs. They have closely checked me both times.

benats
Aug 8, 2010 at 9:14 p.m.
Suggest removal

Maybe they should actually charge non residents at the landfill. I know everytime I've been there, they never even check my ID that the sign says to have out.

SarahB1
Aug 8, 2010 at 7:42 p.m.
Suggest removal

Wow, no anti-Obama comments in a few hours. Oh, that's right, it is time for prime time FoxNews. This story is about collection fees in Janesville, WI. What does that have to do with national office or national politics? Hornet makes a good suggestion on decreasing the amount of trash needing hauling to the landfill. In this beautiful season of locally grown fresh fruits and vegetables, I buy a good share of my groceries fresh from the stands. No packaging, no waste, lots of good taste.

dkush21
Aug 8, 2010 at 3:11 p.m.
Suggest removal

gonefishin: I'd like to see you try bringing everything back the way it was before Bush and his administration ruined this country. Obama kept telling everyone that things would not get fixed overnight. But alas, we are so spoiled that we want instant gratification.

Hornet
Aug 8, 2010 at 3:08 p.m.
Suggest removal

Change your buying habits...change what types of packaging you buy. If everyone would cut back on packaging/stuff, the landfills would be less full, the trucks could get their pickups made faster... the world would be a nicer place...

dkush21
Aug 8, 2010 at 1:38 p.m.
Suggest removal

I think it should be a choice. If we don't want to pay for the fee, we can drop off our own trash. Sorry, but the city keeps imposing more fees, more stupid projects, etc. when alot of people are out of work.. Why is it no one is focusing on bringing good paying jobs here to Janesville instead of focusing on ways to make people pay more. And now we have to look at our electric bills going up yet again. Yep, money must grow on trees!

wtp
Aug 8, 2010 at 12:33 p.m.
Suggest removal

Every home out of the city limits and farms has to pay a private vendor to pick up there garbage. We don't hear them making all this noise about having to pay to have it hauled away. I don't see why the people of Janesville has anything to complain about having there garbage picked up free for the past 20 yrs. It's time you pay for this service as well.

SarahB1
Aug 8, 2010 at 12:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

TJ: I can guarantee you that MadeInUSA is NOT Rep. Sheridan.

SarahB1
Aug 8, 2010 at 12:10 p.m.
Suggest removal

Don't most apartment buildings (not including houses split into numerous apartments) use private services to empty their dumpsters?

belisamasana
Aug 8, 2010 at 12:09 p.m.
Suggest removal

I have a private garbage company that picks up two cans and my recycling every week. I pay $14 a month for this service and I'm very happy with them.

TJRockCounty
Aug 8, 2010 at 11:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

Paperboy-Still licking your wounds from my previous posts I see.

paperboy
Aug 8, 2010 at 10:43 a.m.
Suggest removal

ybov, Thanks for spelling it out for some of the bloggers who don't give much thought to their post.

proartist
Aug 8, 2010 at 9:25 a.m.
Suggest removal

Point of information....over 20 years ago homeowners in Austin, Minnesota (south-central) did not have a municipal trash pick-up. All residents contracted with 1 of 4 different haulers at an average of $300 annually for the basic level of garbage pick-up (i.e. 2 cans/week). Any more was assessed more. All haulers picked up on different days so neighborhoods had trash containers on the curb of various properties throughout the week. All recycling was hauled by the homeowner to a central disposal site.

TJRockCounty
Aug 8, 2010 at 9:23 a.m.
Suggest removal

MadeinUSA- Bill Truman never received a truck from the city. Anything he owns he paid for. Stop trying to start rumors Mr. Sheridan.
tbov- Thanks for your experience, I hadn't thought about the apartments.

steveknox
Aug 8, 2010 at 8:58 a.m.
Suggest removal

MadeinUSA. Can you explain your comment about Bill Truman. Are you suggesting he received a personal vehicle?

mayhem08
Aug 8, 2010 at 8:28 a.m.
Suggest removal

Exactlly we let everyone and their brother dump in our landfill. I don't think their garbage is our problem. Make them build their own landfill!!

MadeinUSA
Aug 8, 2010 at 8:27 a.m.
Suggest removal

Perhaps they should give back all the brand new (18) GM pick-up trucks the City of Janesville bought , including the one Bill Truman got, even though he is "without a job or home".!?

RockEnvironmentalNetwork
Aug 7, 2010 at 10:28 p.m.
Suggest removal

The problem is, that people think that our garbage pick up is free, or included in our taxes. It isn't. It costs a lot of money to have trucks and personnel picking up trash, so first, we have to get rid of that thought. Residents haven't paid for our own garbage pick up since the early 1990's, because the former City Manager thought it would be a great idea to bring "other people's garbage" into our community, and charge them. Other people's trash has paid for our pick up fees. The problem with this scenario, is that instead of just paying .77 cents per WEEK, we have taken ownership of other's trash FOREVER. Most people would rather have paid the .77 and reserved the landfill space for residents' use, since it is residents that pay to close and open a new landfill. Nothing is free. Post closure care on the landfill is for 40 years, but that trash will be there forever. Who will pay to care for the landfill after the 40 years is up?

tbov
Aug 7, 2010 at 7:10 p.m.
Suggest removal

TJ the every other week does not work, we did that in our town, once it went 3 weeks, the smell was bad and you have apt buildings and houses that had no place to put it and was left outside all over, plus animals get into it. We have 10 dollars extra a month put on our water bill now to pay for our trash pickup. This is another state then wis.

TJRockCounty
Aug 7, 2010 at 5:49 p.m.
Suggest removal

Personally I favor the idea of every other week pick-up. This could cut the cost in half. You would need less trucks, less personnel, and less time.

exFIB
Aug 7, 2010 at 5:33 p.m.
Suggest removal

How about the city make their trash drivers actually work a 8 hour day? They get paid for 8 hours but they seem to finish routes early every day. I seem them dumping their trucks at 1:00 - 1:30 every day when they start work at 7:00 am.
-
How about they city raise it's tipping fees? The landfill fees are so low that it gets trash from a wide area OUTSIDE of Rock County. They claim that the fees are on average with other landfills but the city lowers the fee per ton when a contractor/municipality will guarantee that they will bring them more trash. Less trash will mean the need for less landfill employees/equipment.
-
How about the city look into contracting out trash collection. Most of the time a private company is more efficient then a government agency when doing the same job.
-
Why don't we single stream now? When a recycle truck dumps at JRC all the co-mingle collected is dumped into the same pile as the single stream from other companies. Only the paper is kept separate. The savings from a quicker, more streamlined collection process would far outway the little revenue generated from keeping it separated. Also the same trucks could be used too, new equipment is NOT needed to take advantage of single-stream collection.

couchsit
Aug 7, 2010 at 5:29 p.m.
Suggest removal

Hopefully they will let people opt out if they don't want trash collection. I could personally transport all the trash my household generates to the dump for far less than $40 a year. On second thought, it would probably just encourage certain people to burn their trash to save $40.
Another idea: Fine people who don't put their trash in secure containers if they leave it out overnight. It takes extra time for the collectors to clean up the mess from the animals getting into it. Plus it looks bad because the collector cant always get every last bit, it's form of littering, IMO.

cfox310
Aug 7, 2010 at 4:31 p.m.
Suggest removal

When will the city understand that this is not the time to keep adding on fees. First in Jan the water went up, the school board is proposing an increase on taxes to cover their budget, and finally the possibility of a garbage fee? I have been on a wage freeze since 2008. Money must grow on trees.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT