Only a Cleanup Can Restore ACORN’s Legitimacy
ACORN’s leaders must have missed Liberal Advocacy 101, which teaches the Ralph Nader lesson: To point a finger at powerful interests, one needs clean hands.
In 1965, General Motors wanted to debilitate Nader, then a young public interest lawyer making hay about the carmaker’s unsafe vehicles. It hired private investigator Vincent Gillen to look into Nader’s sex life, potential drug use and his political affiliations -- anything to, as Gillen said, „shut him up.“ But Nader was a man with no lurid secrets. He didn’t even succumb when women were hired to proposition him for blackmail purposes; and when the scheme was exposed it was General Motors that had to clean up its act..
At the height of the scandal, Nader testified before a Senate committee about the trap set for him. He said that apparently „one has to have an ascetic existence and steely determination in order to speak truthfully, candidly and critically of American industry.“ In other words, be a saint, otherwise the powerful will get you.
ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, needs to take this to heart. It’s going to take a ton of sanitizer to clean up the mess on its hands, but it can be done.
ACORN has been in existence since the 1970s, organizing low-income communities into activist enclaves and turning the nation’s poor into engaged voters. But its success in bringing minority voters to the polls has also earned it powerful enemies, including the entirety of the Fox News bullpen and the Republican Party.
Now, by its own misdeeds, the organization is in trouble in a way that has shattered the trust of supporters. No one can watch the infamous videos that have gone viral on the Web without feeling shame for ACORN and wondering about the group’s judgment.
ACORN workers in offices in Brooklyn, Baltimore and Washington are caught on hidden camera advising filmmakers posing as a prostitute and pimp on how to obtain a loan to run a brothel. Credulous ACORN housing and tax advisors readily volunteer information to conservative activists James O’Keefe and Hannah Giles, the supposed sex traffickers, on the best way to lie to the IRS and hide a prostitution ring involving underage, illegal immigrant girls.
The videos come on the heels of warrants against 11 part-time ACORN workers hired to register voters in Homestead, Fla. They allegedly forged nearly 900 registrations using fake names and addresses.
This pile of bad acts has gotten too big. Officialdom is jumping ship, starting with an overwhelming vote Monday in the Senate to hold back federal housing money from ACORN, and there have been calls for a federal probe. The group may soon find it hard to see its breath on a mirror.
Not helping things was ACORN’s initial insipid response. Bertha Lewis, ACORN’s chief executive, threatened Fox News with lawsuits, claiming the videos were doctored. ACORN defended itself by saying that other offices approached by O’Keefe and Giles didn’t bite. But the group isn’t absolved because workers in other offices acted ethically. That’s like defending the integrity of a police department because only a small percentage of its cops take bribes.
Fair or not, the videos say to me -- someone who defended ACORN in the last election against Republican attacks over its voter registration practices -- that the group will help anyone cheat on their taxes who pays a fee and signs up as an ACORN member.
Since its initial missteps at the scandal’s eruption, ACORN has come to understand that it must address its lack of controls and training and will launch an independent internal investigation. The organization knows that without a clean sweep and a new professionalism, the moral authority the group relies upon to push its progressive agenda will dissipate like steam from a hunk of hot humble pie.
Among ACORN’s good works have been its national campaign to raise minimum wages, efforts to protect homeowners from foreclosure, and a campaign to get America’s workers guaranteed sick days. But do-gooders who rankle corporate interests or an established political order must be beyond reproach. Their personal reputation and causes are inextricably linked. Nader only succeeded in promoting car safety because there was nothing salacious about him to find. ACORN must make itself just as pristine.


Sep 23, 2009 at 5:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
janesvillean; That might be part of the problem - how many havent been exposed? - I would like to know how many Acorn offices they went to with this story and attempted to get on tape & there was nothing worth reporting.
Sep 23, 2009 at 4:41 p.m.
Suggest removal
916WI, do recall that it was ACORN's own audit procedures that brought the fraudulent registrations in two states to the attention of officials. As yet, there has been no evidence presented that any real person was fraudulently registered and then used that registration to vote. It was only padding for the independent contractors who were paid by the name.
.
Northman, RICO would require proving that the organization itself, as you say, "promoted" criminal activity. If they only had poor auditing, that is at worst negligent. Since they have fired almost every person who has been exposed for being unqualified or unprincipled, it is difficult to make the case that they are in fact "promoting" criminality.
Sep 23, 2009 at 8:25 a.m.
Suggest removal
Yes Janesvillean.......ACORN does bring voters into the democratic process, unfortunately it always seems to be a toss up with this organization as to whether those voters are real or not:)
Sep 23, 2009 at 7:37 a.m.
Suggest removal
It’s way past time to shed a little light into the whole ACORN organization. They seem to be promoting criminal activities on a broad front, which makes them eligible for RICO prosecution. Let an independent prosecutor start digging and see what they are really doing, and where all the taxpayer dollars are going. Don’t expect the White House to endorse that though – no telling what sort of dirt might end up sticking to big O.
Sep 23, 2009 at 7:10 a.m.
Suggest removal
By all means, let's clean up their act--so they won't continue to be an "embarassment" to the left-wing fringe element! Not illegal, unethical, immoral, & an affront to the taxpayers sending them billions of dollars--just embarassing! Back to my original point, it's amusing that liberals are so infuriated over ONE news outlet that refuses to march in lockstep with the rest of the crowd. You guys won the election, you've got 95% of the media in your pocket, & Fox is still not entitled to the same freedom of the press as your "pets"?
Sep 22, 2009 at 11:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
brwe, you know that ACORN fired those people, too, right?
.
Blumer is correct, though. ACORN may bring some voters to the democratic process, but in general -- speaking as a person who burned shoe leather for a 527 organization in 2004 -- these voters are low-value. They are not certain to actually vote and probably only in the presidential or other top-tier races. They will be less informed and involved than other voters, and will probably have to be reached again in four years. I have long wondered whether ACORN's obvious management and oversight problems -- which have attracted some legitimate attention but mostly hot air that pretends the organization is institutionally corrupt and that these fraudulent registrations are the same thing as "vote fraud" -- are worth these small numbers of low-value voters. If ACORN is not to be an embarassment time and again now that so many eyes are on them, they must change their practices.
Sep 21, 2009 at 4:24 p.m.
Suggest removal
Interesting--"its success in bringing minority voters to the polls has also earned it powerful enemies, including the entirety of the Fox News bullpen and the Republican Party." There's no way (right?) that Acorn's corruption in registering voters in the last election attracted the attention of Fox News? As far as I can see, the writer's just as guilty of making excuses as the group he/she's chastising!
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.