Briarmoon ticketed at foreclosure sale
Photo 
K. Andreah Briarmoon
JANESVILLE A regular Janesville City Council candidate who has a history of fighting the city over code violations is accused of disrupting the foreclosure sale of her property.
K. Andreah Briarmoon, 57, of 339 S. Locust St., Janesville, was mailed a ticket for obstructing an officer stemming from an incident at the Rock County Courthouse on Wednesday, Rock County sheriff’s officials said.
According to the sheriff’s report:
A sheriff’s deputy was conducting a foreclosure sale when Briarmoon objected to the sale of one of her properties.
The deputy told Briarmoon the sale would continue and asked her to stop interrupting.
Briarmoon continued objecting, and the deputy warned her she would be arrested if her behavior continued.
Briarmoon kept yelling about the sale and sale price.
The deputy then arrested Briarmoon and turned her over to courthouse security until the sale was finished.
After the sale, Briarmoon was released. The ticket was mailed to her after the incident.
Briarmoon has a history of being at the center of property disputes.
Briarmoon fought the city for more than three years when officials ordered her to take down a garage she owned on rental property at 1402 W. Court St.
She eventually lost that case in court, and the city demolished the garage in August 2006.
Briarmoon was arrested for trying to stop the demolition.
Briarmoon fought the city again in 2008 about code violations involving a shed on property she owns at 332 S. Academy St., diagonal to her home on Locust Street.
The shed violated a city code that prohibits an outbuilding on property without a primary dwelling.
The city charged Briarmoon with five counts of violating the city’s zoning ordinance.
A Rock County judge later dismissed the case at the city’s request because the shed was removed.

Nov 10, 2009 at 9:20 a.m.
Suggest removal
Yesterday, two council members gave her a verbal beating for her most recent libeling and slandering of city employees.
One of the council members exposed the fact that she stood to profit monetarily from her interest in the Case Feed Store. This profiteering stands in stark contrast to her claims of concern for her community.
Nov 9, 2009 at 8:42 a.m.
Suggest removal
Yes, it is individuality and cooperation that drives society, while megalomania and demagoguery are an assault on it.
Nov 8, 2009 at 10:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
thanks gazettefan <3 I do feel like I've risen above but it took 2000 miles of space - don't know if I would have done so well in JVL!
Nov 4, 2009 at 5:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yes, at least one of the adult children has risen above it all.
Nov 4, 2009 at 3:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
It's no suprise her kids turned out the way they did. Poor things. Too bad you can't pick your parents.
Nov 4, 2009 at 9:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
I wonder how many bunnies she's boiled.
Nov 4, 2009 at 7:07 a.m.
Suggest removal
;~)
Nov 3, 2009 at 10:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
You guys make my day =)
Nov 3, 2009 at 6:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
She gotta face like a big moon.
Nov 3, 2009 at 3:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
Ladystardust I read somewhere that it was an Officer Garvin who was subbing at the auction that day.
Nov 2, 2009 at 3:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
truth1, the way a foreclosure works, the bank has a lien against the property which it needs satisfied. That associated debt -- generally the unpaid balance of the mortgage -- is the "value" of the property to the bank (similarly, during a tax sale you can buy a property for just the back taxes), and is usually the opening bid. Since 9 out of 10 foreclosures are "bought back" by the bank, the price announcement is basically routine -- there are no bidders and the sale closes, all in about two minutes. (He has a whole pile of these to go through, at least recently.)
.
It's easy to find out how much the bank is setting as the auction price, too, and a real estate ... professional ... such as Briarmoon ought to have had some inkling of this.
.
It really doesn't matter, though. The firsthand report that I can pass on here is that while her ruckus was nothing like when she actually fought the cops back in the shed dispute, she was still inappropriately interrupting a legal proceeding after she had been given explicit warnings and provoked the sheriff's deputy, and she was even warned to be quiet on the way out lest handcuffs were necessary. The point isn't so much that she caused a ruckus as that she has a habit of making anything involving Andreah ... all about Andreah. It's like when my cat decides it needs attention and knocks something off the table.
Nov 2, 2009 at 2:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
ladystardust, you have us all wondering as to the offending behavior.
Nov 2, 2009 at 1:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
It used to be a joke that back in the day when her kids lived at home, and the neighbors would call the cops on KAB that the station would send the newest "rookie" to handle her. All those poor guys. They had no idea what they were in for, I wonder if the Sheriff in this article remembers her when he first started working the "beat". Which Sheriff was this? I want to send him a Thank You package for warning her and then following though and actually putting KAB in a time-out. HAHA Just like a little kid!
Nov 2, 2009 at 4:03 a.m.
Suggest removal
lol
Nov 1, 2009 at 5:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
Thanks, ladystardust.
truth..., as soon as you get to the bottom of this unimportant matter please get back to us with your findings.
Nov 1, 2009 at 12:20 p.m.
Suggest removal
I don't give one whit one way or the other about this, but since when is the purported "value" of anything stated to prospective buyers of an item at an auction???.. if in fact that did happen .....The "value" of anything at any auction is WHAT ANYONE WILL PAY AT THAT TIME....NOT what someone makes a statement that it is.
Nov 1, 2009 at 12:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
YES! Gazette fan I like you. You word my thoughts so eloquently!
Nov 1, 2009 at 10:55 a.m.
Suggest removal
In Sound Off in today's print edition, the caller claims B'moon didn't cause a ruckus and that all she was trying to do was correct the officer re: the value of the property.
Well, she gave up all say as to the value of the property (especially officially) when she failed to follow through with her mortgage obligation and when she failed to keep the property in good condition.
And it appears she continued to draw income from the rentals during the period in which she failed to make her mortgage payments.
Nov 1, 2009 at 9:08 a.m.
Suggest removal
cuthbert, calm down and go eat some of your candy!!!
Nov 1, 2009 at 7:20 a.m.
Suggest removal
I saw her wielding a big sword at the JayCee's thing one time in Traxler Park.
Oct 30, 2009 at 12:22 p.m.
Suggest removal
May day, may day, I meant "my" day.
Oct 30, 2009 at 11:45 a.m.
Suggest removal
engima, your next to last post is making may day!
Oct 30, 2009 at 11:27 a.m.
Suggest removal
Sorry, I meant to say what goes around comes around. I get that mixed up. lol
Oct 30, 2009 at 11:25 a.m.
Suggest removal
What comes around, goes around and it looks like she is getting hers - amen! I also have had personal dealings with her where she stiffed me out of money and a place to live. I was soooo angry with her at the time. I also know for a fact that a guy I know got fed up with her constantly needling him and he punched her right in the nose!
Oct 30, 2009 at 9:36 a.m.
Suggest removal
HannaHolly, if you understood what she's all about, you'd understand that she has this coming.
Hey, how about that time she tried to get leftovers for free after the kitchen closed at the Speak Easy?!!!
Oct 29, 2009 at 5:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
Hanny Holly - if you want to be in the spotlight, don't be suprised when you are recognized.....Nobody is attacking, just making comments
Oct 29, 2009 at 4:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
DiGriz - LMFAO!!! That is too rich!
Miss_Katie: Well, ya know that Halloween is coming up.
Oct 29, 2009 at 1:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
What is wrong with all of you? Why all the nasty personal attacks? Classic Janesville.
Oct 29, 2009 at 1:32 p.m.
Suggest removal
DiGriz - thanks for making my holiday cards for me!! LMAO - checking that task off my list :D
Localboy - you hit is right on the head!
Oct 28, 2009 at 11:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
I saw her at woodmans wearing a beret and a black cape...
Oct 28, 2009 at 10:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAH!!! DiGriz, that's too funny!! ROTFLMFAO!
Oct 28, 2009 at 9:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
Thanks for the important posts, ladystardust.
Oct 28, 2009 at 7:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
"I sure hope none of you people slamming Andreah Briarmoon ever lose your job or have a family member hit by a medical catastrophe. Either one could cause you to lose your home. And who would want their home to be sold for $17,000.00 ? That itself is an outrage considering the price of houses these days. Some greedy person will buy it up, fix it up and sell it for a huge profit.
And Ladystardust: sounds like you have a personal problem with Andreah. Unfortunately your post makes you sound bitter and petty. Since you personally know that she travels the world and owns a horse in Lake Geneva, how come you don't know what she does all day ?"-Gina51
First of all a medical catastrophe is not the reason she lost her home. In fact this property has been on the chopping block for a long time, she was able to squeeze through under the wire with help from Obama and she lied on her forms and then couldn't make the payments. I know many people here worked hard and still lost their home, which is really sad, but it's quite different when you lose your "monopoly properties" and you still have your own home. Bottom line is this woman needs to stop fighting the system and just accept it, because she's forced to either way, only it's more expensive for all of us. Also I must say I hope someone buys the "galleria" and tears it down, and makes a skate park. LOL
Oct 28, 2009 at 7:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
gina I asked because last I knew SHOREWEST FIRED her and then she had her "own" home business / realty "group" (i don't think a business of one person counts as a group of people)She also has a list of other businesses on her mailbox, calling herself a poet, muse and a "publisher". I have no idea what she does because I have been avoiding her the best I can for a few years. And yes I do sound BITTER when a adult woman CRIES and whines like a BABY WHILE she exploits every loophole in any system executive or judicial. If you must know she is the grandmother of my children and she is banned from my kids and my home and yes there are plenty of reasons why I don't have time to tell you all of the horrific things she has done but I can safely say she has no idea where I live and if she does show up on my doorstep I will call the police and the sherriff and I will get a restraining order put on her for trespassing. YOUR RIGHT I AM PETTY AND BITTER BECAUSE SHE KEEPS TRYING TO WEASLE HER WAY INTO MY LIFE AND HER OWN SON KNOWS SHE IS NOT TO BE TRUSTED AROUND CHILDREN AND SHE IS NOT A GOOD PERSON AT ALL. SO all you DreahCIPLES can believe she has it so bad and oh poor little dreah when really she's the one exploiting you and trying to build a sad following for her wannabe political organization C.A.R.D..... You may be shocked to learn that her own family has nothing to do with her and I wonder what she does during the day because she certainly isnot making an income and she certainly is not maintaining any of her rental properties (like this one in question) she certainly does not see her family and she certainly has no friends. So I just picture her up in her attic on locust ave, recording her self for her sad quality program.
Oct 28, 2009 at 11:04 a.m.
Suggest removal
gina51, the complaints are about Briarmoon's actions at the courthouse. Yelling at a sheriff’s deputy doing his/her duty is not acceptable. Besides, isn't the property in question a rental unit?
Oct 28, 2009 at 10:45 a.m.
Suggest removal
I sure hope none of you people slamming Andreah Briarmoon ever lose your job or have a family member hit by a medical catastrophe. Either one could cause you to lose your home. And who would want their home to be sold for $17,000.00 ? That itself is an outrage considering the price of houses these days. Some greedy person will buy it up, fix it up and sell it for a huge profit.
And Ladystardust: sounds like you have a personal problem with Andreah. Unfortunately your post makes you sound bitter and petty. Since you personally know that she travels the world and owns a horse in Lake Geneva, how come you don't know what she does all day ?
Oct 27, 2009 at 9:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
And the troll, maxdetail, still clueless and trolling to destroy the First Amendment.
Oct 27, 2009 at 8:23 p.m.
Suggest removal
The smart opinions are against B'moon. There is hope for humanity.
She makes people with legitimate complaints shy away from complaining because they don't want to be linked with her.
Oct 27, 2009 at 7:23 p.m.
Suggest removal
Now that is funny. If they had a circus one, she would be the ring leader....
Oct 27, 2009 at 6:45 p.m.
Suggest removal
DiGriz, Way too funny. I've been laughing so hard my sides hurt!
Oct 27, 2009 at 1:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
Maybe now someone will fix up that eyesore. I mean really, Lilac! It looks like a little wind could blow it over!
Oct 27, 2009 at 1:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
I'm interested in how the tone of the comments has shifted in regards to Briarmoon...this woman has been the subject of numerous articles, the opinion seems to have shifted considerably in her favor. Hmmm. I wonder if that's in response to her, or just a sign of the times? Regardless, it makes for interesting reading.
Oct 27, 2009 at 12:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
Not to get off topic, but the bailout of the financial industry was to prevent a world wide economic collapse. The fact that we're still getting screwed by Wall Street is way off topic.
Oct 27, 2009 at 12:24 p.m.
Suggest removal
Zoom, there was no legal hold, although paperwork was delayed on many FHA-backed loans and some major lenders had voluntary moratoriums. I have no way of telling if this loan was covered by either of those. The federal moratorium only lasted about a month last winter.
.
The Obama administration has implemented a foreclosure abatement program, but this applies only to personal residences. Investment property (much as I would personally wish otherwise) is not eligible for a similar rescue. That said, we did bail out the financial industry and they haven't done enough.
Oct 27, 2009 at 11:54 a.m.
Suggest removal
There actually was a hold on foreclosures, for many months. That's now over. Besides, this is rental property, not somebodies primary residence.
Oct 27, 2009 at 11:04 a.m.
Suggest removal
MakeItBetter - as sad and humble as a foreclosure can be, it is not your right or constitutional requirement to own a home. Owning a home is a privilage that requires responsibility. Of course, some foreclosures are due to reasons beyond ones simplistic control, but you can't regulate that. Too many people would take advantage of it. If you loose your home, you have to pull up your bootstraps, work harder, and try again when the time is right. Learn from the situation. If 100% of the people were losing homes (that owed), then action would be required. However, only a small portion (relative to current ownership)are losing them, so the majority must be doing something right.
Oct 27, 2009 at 10:36 a.m.
Suggest removal
The really important thing is, we should all be showing up on the courthouse steps together protesting all the foreclosure sales and pressing our lawmakers for some fundamental stop-gap changes. Lot's of people are having trouble for reasons not of their doing. Hopefully the economy will improve before too very long, but in the meantime, there should be a moratorium on all foreclosure sales as a matter of principle.
The wealthy and greedy are using this period to become even richer. There will be no middle class lifestyle in the future if we don't stand up for what's right now. Those of you who still have jobs shouldn't be too smug -- the bottom could fall out quickly, and it might be you homes being auctioned next.
Oct 27, 2009 at 10:27 a.m.
Suggest removal
Oh that I had that kind of power Prounion, my head swims with the possibilities. To control the media, to command obeisance in public forums, to decide who will be heard and who will not, to send G-fan back to, well.. wherever trolls come from.
Prounion, I can't believe you were third in line to get to the Fifth Quarter comments. You're slipping buddy. We had a bet you'd be first to blurt, I lost a buck.
Oct 27, 2009 at 9:08 a.m.
Suggest removal
MikeF - Ha! That's rich!! Good one.
Oct 27, 2009 at 9:04 a.m.
Oct 27, 2009 at 8:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
Max - did you get the Biblecamp story shut down? Was it because we proved biblically that the old testament god endorsed rape, murder, slavery, ect?
Oct 27, 2009 at 7:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
Keep in mind that KAB is a responsible, accountable, and respectable citzen who plays the game of life by the rules, and her success is totally self made. Anything negative that happens to her is on the account of somebody else who has wronged her. She is unselfish, and mostly serving of her fellow man. Any personal plight she has is often played out in secret, as this is what makes her humble.
Oct 27, 2009 at 12:56 a.m.
Suggest removal
Goodness boys, take it outside. We're all here to gripe about KAB and her destructive/pointless/illegal/immoral acts, remember? =)
Oct 26, 2009 at 10:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
maxdetail: I think you fell off of your trick pony. JMO
Oct 26, 2009 at 8:13 p.m.
Suggest removal
Hey troll, maxdetail, I didn't attack her family. I pointed out that her family is against her too. Learn how to read.
Oct 26, 2009 at 6:51 p.m.
Suggest removal
Troll, I point out it's unfair to attack this woman's family, and you bring up religion. I pegged you as a one trick pony. You are a boring troll.
Oct 26, 2009 at 5:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yeah, maxdetail, your religion serves you well. Someone points out that you totally misread posts here and all you can do in response is insult people.
Join her posse. Then she'll have one person on her side.
Oct 26, 2009 at 5:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
Poor Mexico, don't you think they have enough issues already? Oh, Max "in the stocks"? Please. It appears she puts herself there, over, and over, and over... At least she can't blame Sheiffer this time! But I could do WITH OUT the attacks on the family, which is why I always flag those posts.
Oct 26, 2009 at 4:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
Gazettefan, I get it now. Does the Gazette pay you to be a troll or is this part of your therapy?
Btw, you're still a troll.
Oct 26, 2009 at 3:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
In Summary
Building inspectors went to Court Street property because of Fire code violations in regards to renting an upstairs apartment to someone with a child (one exit no fire escape from second floor) Fire inspector noted condition of the garage and made a note that fire fighters should not enter the garage if it catches fire. Now automatic mandatory code inspection is required. Violations issued and orders to correct issued. 6 years later building is still not repaired. city orders it torn down and with the labor to do that I bet that garage cost the city at laest $250,000.00 of those hard earned tax payer dollars. Somehow the city is at fault for violating her rights?
City resident calls in to report a person living in a tent on her vacant lot. During the investigation of that call it is noted a building has been moved onto the lot that has no primary residence. Code violations are issued because City codes do not allow garages, chicken coops or sheds on a lot without a house on it.
There they go picking on her again!
AKB Fails to meet her financial obligations in repaying the note on her bank financed property FOR QUITE SOME TIME and THE BANK forcloses. The property is auctioned off on the steps of the courthouse by a duly appointed officer of the court as has been done since the depression. and somehow the CITY is picking on her again. What did the City have to do with this last situation? NOTHING!
I see many people here who are always harping on the city, City Council, City Manager and everyone else for spending your tax dollars on worthless adventures well I would love to see an itimized bill for how much AKB has cost the citizens of this fair city in her failed attempts to be "treated fairly" or in her case treated like she was one of the good old boys getting FAVORS so she did not need to be treated like every other citizen who lives by the rules. I know she does not agree with the rules and in an attempt to change them she has run for elected office on many occasions and has always met with resounding defeat. KAB is there a possibility the majority of regular people do not agree with your ideas and that why you always go down in flames at every election?
WAKE UP AND SMELL THE ROSES. Then MOVE to MEXICO or some other place where they have no rules to keep slum Lords from keeping unsafe property for people to die in.
Sorry Mexico, no disrespect intended
Oct 26, 2009 at 3:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
maxdetail, can you read? Go back and read ladystardust's posts.
By the way, it was your lies that caused that other blog to be shut down. That, too, had something to do with you inability to read.
Oct 26, 2009 at 3:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
You're right Ladystardust, the Gazette puts her in the stocks and all the townsfolk line up to throw rotten veggies at her and personally attack her entire family. I've seen them disable a thread for far less. I got a feeling she's on someone's hit list at the Gazette.
Oct 26, 2009 at 3:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yes, and she calls the 4th Ward an affordable housing neighborhood.
Oct 26, 2009 at 2:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
It's pretty funny how alot of these posts remain, usually "comments are disabled by staff" by now.
On a side note, I can personally say that this woman travels the globe, shops at earthsong and even owns a horse in Lake Geneva . So the $1000 rent was to pay for her to rent out a stable and go look at a horse 3 months out of the year
Oct 26, 2009 at 2:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
Antebellum and colorized by Ted Turner.....
Oct 26, 2009 at 1:49 p.m.
Suggest removal
The photo is antebellum, original daguerreotype.
Oct 26, 2009 at 1:45 p.m.
Suggest removal
Why does the Gazette keep using an old picture then?
Oct 26, 2009 at 1:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
I like this one better.. http://www.changeforjanesville.com/image...
Oct 26, 2009 at 1:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
Thanks.
Then whining about what it sold for at auction is even more crazy.
Oct 26, 2009 at 1:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
Gazettefan, according to the court record, the judge entered a "no deficiency judgement" on 12/2/2008, meaning that the property owner is not on the hook for any difference between the sale price and the mortgage value. But the bank probably set the sale price to cover the total value remaining on the mortgage.
.
In most cases, it isn't worth it to the bank to continue to try to squeeze blood from a stone. One can imagine cases of outright fraud where they might do so, but most people losing their property don't have any money.
Oct 26, 2009 at 12:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
I like this picture better.....
http://www.briarmoon.us/
Oct 26, 2009 at 12:32 p.m.
Suggest removal
I know for a fact that she charged a grand a month for rent at the house on West Court. Met the guy who rented there and he said it was as bad inside as outside. They moved! Again, it is sitting empty and it is an eyesore! I say, tear it down! Not safe for humans to live in.
Oct 26, 2009 at 12:20 p.m.
Suggest removal
She just wants attention. Maybe she is lonely! I feel sorry for her ignorance.
Oct 26, 2009 at 11:59 a.m.
Suggest removal
DOES she even have a JOB? What does she do all day? Does she really LIVE off of her tenants overpriced rent? If so, why didn't she make the house payments? Her properties were an inch away from auction last year, and she somehow smuggled out of it, found a loophole,exploited it, and took a wasteful dump on it. Then she cries foul and tells everyone "HEY STOP WHAT YOUR DOING AND LOOK AT THIS CRAP THE CITY is dumping on poor little defenseless MEEEEEE"
Oct 26, 2009 at 11:05 a.m.
Suggest removal
Get a grip Shotgun - what freedom did she lose? The freedom to keep a property after defaulting on her loan?? The freedom to have four properties of which she wasn't paying the mortgage on any? That's not a freedom in this country as it turns out.
Oct 26, 2009 at 10:44 a.m.
Suggest removal
What a sad sad story of the lost freedoms for one, and maybe all.
Oct 26, 2009 at 8:25 a.m.
Suggest removal
Purrmaid - Me, too! rexkramer - Excellent post! Whaaaaaaa. AB - Go cry a river somewhere else.
Oct 26, 2009 at 7:52 a.m.
Suggest removal
You reap what you sow. You would think she would believe in karma by now.
Oct 26, 2009 at 7:27 a.m.
Suggest removal
Does she still owe the difference of what she owed on the mortgage and the 17k?
Oct 26, 2009 at 7:19 a.m.
Suggest removal
I wonder if the new owner will take on the responsibilities of stewardship for the former location of the "freedom shrine."
Oct 26, 2009 at 12:19 a.m.
Suggest removal
Oh - OUCH!! Sold back to the bank for $17K - that's gotta hurt.
Oct 26, 2009 at 12:15 a.m.
Suggest removal
Great memory - SAME WOMAN!!! What a coincidence ;) She just doesn't seem to like following those pesky laws. The bank gave her about a year and a half before they foreclosed. This property, along with the other two she currently carries mortgages on, have been on and off the chopping block for the last year and a half. You'd think that if you didn't have enough money to pay your mortgage, you'd follow the laws so you'd quit being slapped with all those fines!
Oct 25, 2009 at 6:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
i couldnt remember but now i do,when someone posted karen mcguire,i think shes the same woman busted for welfare fraud an food stamp fraud years ago,maybe its not the same woman but im sure it is,shes not very honest,if i have the wrong person,i apologize.
Oct 25, 2009 at 4:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
carlito......, how long does it have to go on before you'll admit that it's all true? She's never received approval in any way: running for council, and court cases, and getting the council to side with her. Is the media conspiring against her?
Speaking of approval, carlito......: a year or so ago she publicly tried to recruit a hundred people to cause an incident at a council meeting so that they could be cited and then choose to have a jury trial.
Choosing to have a jury trial was supposed to be for the purpose of clogging-up the county court system, period -what a great cause! If you don't know this about her, why don't you? IT'S A MATTER OF RECORD, ON DVD, HER SHOW.
Guess how many people she recruited. NONE. Unless you were ready to go into action for her but the other 99 didn't show up.
Oct 25, 2009 at 3:32 p.m.
Suggest removal
Sorry Boston....It's all Obama's fault!
Oct 25, 2009 at 2:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
traveler2 and okie, Yea I know about the "trial". I testified in it. They were found innocent by a jury of peers and that has nothing to do with this. Miss Prochaska was not involved in any way, in fact she was angry because it made her name look bad and ruined her "reputation" (as if she needed help). She was a selfish miser then and she still is now. Traveler2 please do not email me if you want to talk to me do it in the posts.
Oct 25, 2009 at 2:16 p.m.
Oct 25, 2009 at 12:36 p.m.
Oct 25, 2009 at 12:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
On the shack property, her tenants called the city with complaints about the house. When the city went to the site it also noticed the unsafe condition of the shack. At that point the city became potentially libel for any harm that could come from the shack. That's why the city had to take action. The city bent over backwards trying to help her with the situation. She fought them every step of the way.
Just before the matter was put to the city council (she wanted the council to overturn all the court rulings against her re: the shack) she told Councilman Greg Addie that she didn't care what the council's decision was because either way it would work for her. PUBLICITY!!!
Oct 25, 2009 at 12:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
"...a Moonbat Wingnut"....I'll be laughing about that one all day. Thanks RexKramer! :)
Oct 25, 2009 at 12:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
JCK the property is where her carriage barn was on W Court.
I do know her, her trouble with the city is her own fault. I personally heard her tell her tale of woe at least 6 years ago about how she had hired someone to re roof her precious carriage barn. After the roofer had removed the shingles he found some of the wood had rotted and he now was going to charge her more than the original quote. She insisted that he honor the quote and when he wouldn’t she had a blue tarp placed over the roof.
Someone then complains about the tarp after a few years and the city gets involved and she starts crying foul. If she would have just repaired the roof in the beginning, the city would never been involved.
Oct 25, 2009 at 11:59 a.m.
Suggest removal
I'm so sick and tired of hearing about her. She's costing the taxpayers thousands of dollars with her childish behavior.
Oct 25, 2009 at 11:48 a.m.
Suggest removal
carlitosway, where do I begin? First of all, she is not "fighting for what is "rightfully" hers. If the property is in foreclosure, then it is no longer in her control; it is the banks property to seel so pay off the debt.
Secondly, you stated that the city is behind this and you are again wrong on this account as well. The city does NOT have a vendetta against her.
Oct 25, 2009 at 11:01 a.m.
Suggest removal
Does anyone know which property is was that foreclosed?
Oct 25, 2009 at 10:32 a.m.
Suggest removal
This was a bank foreclosure (2008CV001145), not a city auction. It has nothing to do with the city government (and the auction is by the *county* sheriff regardless). The sale price is set by the deficiency on the mortgage. In 95% of sales, the bank is just buying it back, and if it sells for more at the sale or later, the bank takes the profit.
.
The "good" news for anyone in this situation is that the sale most likely satisfies the mortgage.
.
Additionally, this was a rental property, not her homestead. There are fewer protections for investment property.
Oct 25, 2009 at 10:02 a.m.
Suggest removal
Spunkmeyer: Sorry. I owe you one.
Oct 25, 2009 at 9:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
carlito......, how long does it have to go on before you'll admit that it's all true? She's never received approval in any way: running for council and court cases and getting the council to side with her. Is the media conspiring against her? (Not to mention her family members.)
Speaking of approval, carlito......: a year or so ago she publicly tried to recruit a hundred people to cause an incident at a council meeting so that they could be cited and then choose to have a jury trial.
Choosing to have a jury trial was supposed to be for the purpose of clogging-up the county court system, period -what a great cause! If you don't know this about her, why don't you?
Guess how many people she recruited. NONE. Unless you were ready to go into action for her but the other 99 didn't show up.
Oct 25, 2009 at 9:41 a.m.
Suggest removal
IMO all you ones who like to judge someone before you walk in their shoes rex and jfan Maybe you will lose something of value and lets see how you handles dictatorship. Have you met her personally or are all your neg comments based on the articles you read and hearsay from whatever. I have had untrue articles written about me fought back won my case against the city But I was one of the lucky ones. But the article printed after I won still didn't give me a clear name it basically gave them lack of burden of proof.....................
Oct 25, 2009 at 7:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
And justin........, remember your manners. Don't make me give you another spankin'.
Oct 25, 2009 at 7:38 a.m.
Suggest removal
Great post, rexkramer.
wesgosin, there was no sympathy for her and her shack because she didn't deserve any.
The photo is antebellum, one of the original daguerreotypes.
She was a real estate agent during one of the greatest real estate and economic upturns in the history of humanity. She should be rich. The state of the economy currently should not be a problem for her. She is in trouble because she has no skills of any kind -other than living off the largess of a democratic society.
And those of you who support her here, her phone number is in the phone book. Contact her and tell her you want to actively support her, then you'll discover why after all this time and exposure on the radio, TV, and in the papers she has no real following.
She slanders and libels people with impunity because civil suits are a horrible experience for everyone, even a victorious aggrieved party. And she has nothing to give up as the loser in a law suit except for a few slum properties (one less now). She has no skills. Did I mention she has no skills?
She's a parasite and her host is the taxpayers.
Oct 25, 2009 at 6:06 a.m.
Suggest removal
There was a time when people had some sympathy, back during the carriage barn saga. But now it's a stale old story.
I wish the Gazette would just stop printing new chapters of "The Briarmoon Chronicles".
Oct 25, 2009 at 2:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
"Andrea apparently didn't feel it was a fare price for her property and it is not fair to sell hers for any less value then they would their own. It is time for people to stand up for their rughts and it is a shame when someone does they are ridiculed in here a charged by police. Freedom of speech and the right to voice freely is no longer our right and Janesville is about one of the worst cities IMO to try and stand up to as they will do what ever it takes to do what they want whether it right or wrong they have the power as the counsel IMO are one sided and could care less about the very people they are elected by to resolve issues and listen to opinions and other options."
Where do I begin...
1) If you don't want the city to decide what price your property sells for, you should perhaps maintain it and even pay taxes and bank payments on it.
2) You do have a right to freedom of speech, however you do not have a right to say whatever you want, whenever you want without consequences. Someone as adept at being a public pain in the rear end as K.A.B. should certainly understand that by now.
3) I'd like to know what other "options, options, options" the city has when dealing with an moonbat wingnut like K.A.B.? I don't know about the rest of you but I don't make my election choices based on who will cater to this kind of loon...then again, we have a President who wants to engage in discussion with the likes of Hugo Chavez and Ahmajinedad, so what do I know.
Oct 25, 2009 at 1:03 a.m.
Suggest removal
its simple. comply with the laws put in place and theres no problem. enough said.
Oct 25, 2009 at 12:38 a.m.
Suggest removal
BostonBill -- Um, I didn't say that. pete did.
Oct 25, 2009 at 12:11 a.m.
Suggest removal
Briarmoon is not a bad person and I do know her personally and the vandetta this city has is they don't like when people fight back and defend what is rightfully theirs!!!!! Now if the city auctions property and the price don't meet the price they want then the sale don't go thru. Andrea apparently didn't feel it was a fare price for her property and it is not fair to sell hers for any less value then they would their own. It is time for people to stand up for their rughts and it is a shame when someone does they are ridiculed in here a charged by police. Freedom of speech and the right to voice freely is no longer our right and Janesville is about one of the worst cities IMO to try and stand up to as they will do what ever it takes to do what they want whether it right or wrong they have the power as the counsel IMO are one sided and could care less about the very people they are elected by to resolve issues and listen to opinions and other options. And by the way the carriage barn was not an eyesore after it was brought up to standard but the counsel had an issue with her and destroyed it anyway!!!!!!IMO to prove a point that they could
Oct 24, 2009 at 11:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
justintimberlakerules:
Not a bad comeback; not a great one but I guess we understand each other.
Oct 24, 2009 at 11:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
I apologize in advance to anyone who may take umbrage to what I am about to type but some things really irk me.
Spunkmeyer wrote,
”Every man know what I am saying.
This is the normal, I do not mean to sound rude about it. But I am completely honest about how women are.
Who really wants a dud.
Most guys want their ladies to have spunk.”
.
Are you for real?
Oct 24, 2009 at 11:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
BostonBill - I'm blaming it on Obama.
Oct 24, 2009 at 11:14 p.m.
Suggest removal
I think justintimberlakerules is justintimberlakerude.
.
Why do you dis people who have not yet posted here? (Hannah)
Oct 24, 2009 at 10:29 p.m.
Oct 24, 2009 at 10:17 p.m.
Oct 24, 2009 at 10:14 p.m.
Suggest removal
NVgrf, didn’t you mean to type……
“It's all Obama's fault!”
Just kidding.
Oct 24, 2009 at 10:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
So much for the 1st Amendment.
Oct 24, 2009 at 10:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
You go, Ms. Briarmoon! Give 'em hell for me too.
Oct 24, 2009 at 9:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
“vindictive manipulative” “demonstrated a monstrous persecution complex” “no respect for any rule” “keeps intentionally ignoring each and every request and order to do things right” “yanking the public chain”
.
Sounds like typical, cliché, politician qualities. lol
Oct 24, 2009 at 9:33 p.m.
Suggest removal
Mush that is ...
Oct 24, 2009 at 9:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
Your full of MUSH !
Oct 24, 2009 at 8:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
Anyone who backs Briarmoon doesn't know her well at all. She is a vindictive manipulative woman who enjoys the spotlight. And over the years she has also demonstrated a monstrous persecution complex. The city has gone way overboard trying to reason with her on so many issues, but she keeps intentionally ignoring each and every request and order to do things right. She has absolutely no respect for any rule that she did not make, including court orders. Yes, foreclosure is hard, but having watched past Briarmoon shenanigans very closely I have no doubt that she was given every possible chance to avoid it, but she chose to avoid it just for the fun of yanking the public chain.
Oct 24, 2009 at 8:07 p.m.
Suggest removal
my guess,that photo is 5 to 6 yrs old. same one shes been using since she started campaining for the city council and her real estate sales.
Oct 24, 2009 at 7:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
Hey guys,lets see if she would be interested in a date auction,you know to help her not get picked on again,& pay some bills!! I'll start with 50.00 bucks.Andreah,are you interested??
Oct 24, 2009 at 5:47 p.m.
Suggest removal
It's nice to see a little compassion toward this woman! I've been sick of people berating her for her every move.
So, as a fellow resident and commenter, thank you for showing a little compassion!
Oct 24, 2009 at 5:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
And why was she was yelling at the official doing his job? The foreclosure process was not instigated by this official I presume. Attending this emotionally trying event seems a bit masochistic.
Oct 24, 2009 at 5:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
Foreclosures suck.
Oct 24, 2009 at 5:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
I am no fan of BM, but losing property at a sheriffs sale in public on the courthouse steps is a very emotional moment, one I hope no one has to endure. Unfortunately for many reasons, a lot of Rock County residents are facing this sad day. It sounds like the deputies gave a lot of "Space" to BM to try an avoid making the situation any more difficult. I'm sorry for BM and those others, but Hats off to those who showed some compassion.
Oct 24, 2009 at 5:20 p.m.
Suggest removal
Some might think this lady is not playing with a full deck,but she is just trying to protect her property,is that wrong?? Besides that,i think she is one hot looking woman!!
Oct 24, 2009 at 4:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
photo
Oct 24, 2009 at 4:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
How old is that picture?
Oct 24, 2009 at 4:27 p.m.
Suggest removal
wheres gazettefan lol
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.