Obama to plead US case at global warming summit

By H. JOSEF HEBERT   Thursday, Nov. 26, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Photo

President Obama speaks during the pardoning of the National Thanksgiving Turkey, Courage, in a ceremony in the North Portico of the White House, in Washington, Wednesday, Nov. 25, 2009.

— President Barack Obama will commit the United States to substantial cuts in greenhouse gas pollution over the next decade — despite resistance in Congress over higher costs — when he travels to a major climate conference in Copenhagen next month.

Obama will attend the start of the conference Dec. 9 before heading to Oslo to accept the Nobel Peace Prize. He will "put on the table" a U.S. commitment to cut emissions by 17 percent over the next decade, on the way to reducing heat-trapping pollution by 80 percent by mid-century, the White House said.

Cutting U.S. carbon dioxide emissions by one-sixth in just a decade would increase the cost of energy as electric utilities pay for capturing carbon dioxide at coal-burning power plants or switch to more expensive alternatives. The price of gasoline probably would increase, and more fuel-efficient automobiles — or hybrids that run on gasoline and electricity — probably would be more expensive.

Obama's promise of greenhouse emissions cuts will require Congress to pass complex climate legislation that the administration says will include an array of measures to ease the price impact. The bills before Congress, for example, would have the government provide polluters free emissions allowances in the early years of the transition from fossil fuels, as well as direct payments to many consumers facing high costs.

Carol Browner, Obama's assistant for energy and climate change, on Wednesday cited a Congressional Budget Office study that said there would be $173-a-year estimated cost to the average household by 2020 if greenhouse gases were cut by 17 percent from 2005 levels. But the CBO analysis also said that if cost-blunting measures in the legislation were not taken into account, the cost to households could jump to $890 per household.

Other studies conducted by pro-industry groups have put the average household costs between $900 to more than $3,000 a year, although many of those studies do not take into account new energy conservation efforts and assume a more pessimistic view of new technology development that could bring actual consumer costs down.

Obama's stopover on the conference's second day — instead of later, when negotiations will be most intense and when most other national leaders will take part — disappointed some European and U.N. climate officials, as well as some environmentalists.

Others said Obama's personal appeal will resonate with the delegates from more than 75 countries and help reset the U.S. image on the climate issue after eight years in which the Bush administration staunchly opposed mandatory reductions in greenhouse gases.

Yvo de Boer, the United Nations climate chief, said it is important for the United States to establish emissions reduction targets and a financial commitment to helping developing countries address climate change.

"If he comes in the first week to announce that, it would be a major boost to the conference," de Boer told The Associated Press.

Obama's participation had been in doubt since it became clear that the Dec. 7-18 conference was unlikely to produce a binding agreement. The original goal of the conference was to produce a new global climate change treaty to replace the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. But in recent weeks it became clear that delegates were likely to produce at best an outline for an agreement to be considered late next year.

The White House said Obama is expecting "robust mitigation contributions" from China and other emerging nations as part of any final agreement. He pressed for cooperation on climate change in meetings with Chinese President Hu Jintao in Beijing last week, and with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh during a state visit at the White House Tuesday.

China said Thursday that Premier Wen Jiabao will take part in the Copenhagen summit.

China's top climate envoy said Wednesday his nation would seek binding pollution targets for developed countries but reject similar requirements for itself at the summit. Yu Qingtai said it would be unfair for all countries to be required to combat global warming since most of the environmental damage has been caused by developed nations during their industrialization over the past 100 to 200 years.

The White House said it will send a half-dozen Cabinet secretaries to the talks, including Energy Secretary Steven Chu and Commerce Secretary Gary Locke, as well as the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, which is preparing regulations to cut greenhouse gases.

The high-profile delegation is intended to reinforce Obama's stance, despite the bitter debate in Congress. The House narrowly passed legislation requiring a cap on greenhouse gases from power plants and industry, but it's still unclear whether Senate Democrats will be able to muster the 60 votes needed to approve a similar bill.

Action in the Senate has been put off until next spring.

___

Associated Press writers Seth Borenstein and Julie Pace in Washington, and Jan Olsen in Copenhagen contributed to this report.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(14)
crafty
Nov 28, 2009 at 10:37 a.m.
Suggest removal

why we can't have a world wide debate over "global warming"? I'll tell you, because the lying greenies would be smacked down in an embarrassing way. their "facts" are mostly lies, and propaganda.
Nnow they found thousands of emails full of global warming lies. we didn't hear about that on CNN. in fact we only heard about it on british news channels.
I will never give any money to any politician or environmental group, especially the environmental defense fund, that pushes the false propaganda. I have demanded my state and federal representatives investigate government funding and coordination of propaganda, i hope you will do the same...

localboysince1968
Nov 28, 2009 at 9:37 a.m.
Suggest removal

DiGriz - I fart in your general direction....Your mother was a hamster, and you father smelt of elderberries!

truth1
Nov 26, 2009 at 4:10 p.m.
Suggest removal

LOL...its not hard to see the truth about this.

truth1
Nov 26, 2009 at 11:25 a.m.
Suggest removal

Another example of barbarian gov'ts outsmarting ours.......nothing new.

truth1
Nov 26, 2009 at 11:22 a.m.
Suggest removal

Yeah .....china will yak yak yak, agree, agree and kissyface everyone there..........us suckers and the politicians we "elected" will follow through on this idiocy to our detriment and NO ONE ELSE will.

localboysince1968
Nov 26, 2009 at 7:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

RAF - this is big business and big money. It is almost the perfect ruse (religion is no 1). You pick a subject that most people know nothing about, nor have the means to dispute, and you start the fear mongering. I wish I would have thought of it myself....It is only second to religion for the biggest money business that you can't prove its results.

RetiredAirForce
Nov 26, 2009 at 7:05 a.m.
Suggest removal

Not one word on the disclosure of tainted studies, deleted e-mails, and e-mails showing how to hide rising temperatures all coming from the number one source for data to the IPCC. What consensus of science right?

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT