Resident questions police response to shots fired call

By TED SULLIVAN   Thursday, Nov. 12, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Photo

Paul Botsford

— Resident criticized police Wednesday for their response to this week’s random shooting, but police said they acted quickly and safely in a dangerous situation.

Two intoxicated men randomly fired nearly 50 shots Monday from a second-story window at 1107 Hamilton Ave., striking two homes and a storage shed across the Rock River.

Paul G. Botsford, 52, of 408 California Court, and Matthew J. Splinter, 35, of 1115 Hamilton Ave., were charged with felony first-degree reckless endangerment, misdemeanor possession of a firearm while intoxicated and misdemeanor disorderly conduct while armed after the shooting.

Both men appeared in Rock County Court on Tuesday. Splinter was ordered held in the Rock County Jail on $4,500 cash bond, and Botsford was ordered held on $3,000 cash bond.

Garry Meister, who lives in the 1200 block of North Parker Drive, said residents in his neighborhood and others are lucky no one was hurt during the time it took police to respond.

He said he or his wife called police twice, and his neighbor also called twice.

“I’m not really trying to second guess the policemen. It just seemed like it took a long time to respond,” he said. “The amount of time it took to finally get that thing over, a whole lot of damage could have been done.”

The initial report of shots fired was made at 12:09 a.m., according to police reports, and the men were arrested at 1:15 a.m. or earlier.

Deputy Chief Steve Kopp said reports initially led police to the area of Black Bridge Road and Parker Drive on the east side of the river. He said officers went to that area and tried to pinpoint the location of the gunshots.

Officers checked the area on foot with shots echoing and eventually learned the gunfire was coming from across the river, Kopp said.

Officers immediately went to that location, but first they had to plan their approach to the armed gunmen and create a perimeter to protect the public, he said.

“We don’t rush blindly into these situations,” Kopp said. “If there was criticism of what someone thought was a slow response, so be it. We’re going to opt for safety every time.”

The men initially wouldn’t come out of the house, despite announcements on a public address system and a phone call, according to the criminal complaint. They eventually surrendered, but it was very close to ending differently.

“I don’t see how anybody can be critical of a potentially tragic situation that ends with no one being hurt,” Kopp said.

Inside the home, police found 47 shell casings from a .32-caliber handgun, 9 mm pistol and 12-gauge shotgun, police said.

Splinter later told police he and Botsford were intoxicated and decided to shoot toward a large tree, bird feeder and bird house, according to the criminal complaint.

He also told police he didn’t know police were in the area until they called the home, according to the criminal complaint.

Splinter is scheduled to next appear in court Tuesday, and Botsford is scheduled to next appear Friday.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(10)
janesvillean
Nov 13, 2009 at 3:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

According to City Council records, the home at 1107 Hamilton is owned by Tom Botsford -- presumably a relative. I don't know if the family is currently living there -- I'm pretty sure this is one of the houses that is being bought by the city due to flooding.

ljs64
Nov 13, 2009 at 12:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

hannah - "Two intoxicated men randomly fired nearly 50 shots Monday from a second-story window at 1107 Hamilton Ave..."
*********
FROM A SECOND STORY WINDOW......this would imply they were INSIDE THE HOME, thus the reason the shell casings were INSIDE THE HOME.

SwissChick
Nov 13, 2009 at 9:40 a.m.
Suggest removal

SarahB1 - Good grief! Exactly!!

SarahB1
Nov 12, 2009 at 9:34 p.m.
Suggest removal

The previous article listed the address where the shots originated as that of Paul Botsford. This article lists him as having a different address. Whose home was this anyway? I hope these guys are grateful that a bystander or somebody inside a home wasn't badly injured or killed by a stray shot. Imagine if that had happened and the person wasn't found until the next day or later.

carlitosway
Nov 12, 2009 at 8:27 p.m.
Suggest removal

Where is Matt Splinters picture? They both were charged. I listened to this on the scanner and the JPD were on the call quickly and did their job and IMO did the right thing once they found where the shots were comming from. I guess you can't please everyone all the time. Great job JPD FYI have you ever heard shots over a river the echo and sounds make it difficult to actually pinpoint without being within the area of the sounds.

Gunslinger
Nov 12, 2009 at 7:17 p.m.
Suggest removal

Good job JPD! I guess you cant please everyone!

janesvillean
Nov 12, 2009 at 5:32 p.m.
Suggest removal

Since the person is not initially under the control of the police, I think measuring the time to make that happen is not really appropriate. The police response time is when they arrive and begin investigating. Consider if someone were on foot and shooting randomly -- it might take hours to find them. Even once located they could continue the gunfire. (I speak, alas, as a necessarily heavy user of 911.)

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT