Janesville School Board OK’s hiring 3 teachers but not without a fight
JANESVILLE Four Janesville schools will get more teachers to eliminate crowded classrooms, but the Janesville School Board was sharply divided Tuesday about the way the positions are funded.
At the same time, the administration made a surprise announcement that it has $750,000 less in this year’s budget than previously believed.
District financial officer Keith Pennington said an “error in communications” resulted in a failure to account for the spending of about $750,000 of state grant money for a class-size reduction program known as SAGE.
The error was discovered in the past two days, Pennington said, and officials will come up with options to balance the budget.
The board can’t raise taxes to fill the budget hole. By law, it must stick with the tax levy it set Oct. 27.
Superintendent Karen Schulte asked for the authority to hire 3.13 teachers as limited-term employees, starting around Dec. 1. She cited classrooms that have more students than allowed in board policy or that are approaching the limit.
The board voted 7-2 to spend up to $132,000 for the teachers’ salaries and benefits.
The money will pay for one teacher for the Adams School’s fourth grade, one for Van Buren School’s fifth grade, a teacher to be split between Marshall and Edison middle schools’ eighth-grade academic classrooms and extra hours to cover middle school art, music and phy ed classes.
Board member Lori Stottler said she favors the hirings, but she had to vote against the proposal on principle.
Two weeks ago, Stottler and three other board members voted against a tax levy that was 1.47 percent greater than the year before. They wanted a slightly larger levy, and Stottler suggested the extra money be set aside to pay for teachers, if needed, this year.
But lower tax levy passed on a 5-4 vote.
The money for the extra teachers will come from the operations budget’s reserve fund, or fund balance.
The teacher positions may turn out to be recurring expenses if enrollments don’t drop, Stottler said, and the board’s policy says fund balance should be used for one-time expenses.
If the board can use fund balance for this, then they will find it hard to resist the argument from unions that the fund balance should be used to give them a raise, Stottler said.
“We can’t just keep spending. This isn’t a savings account we can keep going to,” Stottler said.
Board member Tim Cullen said it was clear the teachers would be limited-term employees whose jobs end at the end of the year.
Stottler said she felt “bamboozled” by the process. Cullen said he didn’t understand the objection, asking how anyone was deceived.
Board member Greg Ardrey voted with Stottler, saying the board’s process was “shameful.”
Board members Bill Sodemann and Peggy Sheridan expressed sympathy for Stottler’s position but voted for the measure anyway.
Sodemann also tried to convince the board to pay for classroom aides instead of teachers, at a much lower cost. He garnered no support.

Nov 13, 2009 at 9:56 a.m.
Suggest removal
Teachers are already doing more with less in districts across Wisconsin. That being said, better student to teacher ratios undoubtedly lead to an increased quality of education for our young people. The realization needs to be made that schools aren't simply businesses-it's nearly impossible to downsize a school's "production"! Our young people today need to receive a quality education, just as all Amercians have been entitled to in the past.
Nov 12, 2009 at 8:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
When are the teachers going to start doing more with less money. Almost every business from auto to fast food are doing more with less. The teachers expect a raise when they won't become more efficient.
Nov 12, 2009 at 7:20 a.m.
Suggest removal
The District always seems to find errors in accounting right around contract negotiations with teachers and/or custodians! Now they really will say they don't have any money for teachers and custodians. However, they can use the same fund balance money that they keep covering their mistakes with to give their employees the money they deserve.
On a side note, thank you board memeber Tim Cullen for pushing for a better heatlh insurance plan. The current one is just a money maker for the district and not the best plan for the members.
Nov 11, 2009 at 9:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
After this major error I must say I have lost all faith and hope for the school board and I might add also the city council for Janesville. Spending is out of control regarding the city as well as the schools. The tax payer is the one that usually ends up on the wrong end of anything the school board and the city council puts their hand to... An old friend has passed away sometime back... I sure miss "commonsense"... He was good when he was around.
Nov 11, 2009 at 9:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
So was the $750,000 error revealed before or after the vote on hiring the new teachers?
Nov 11, 2009 at 8:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
nimrods that would rather build more parks
Nov 11, 2009 at 6:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
Oh - now it's "an error in communications" as opposed to "an accounting error". It's still $750,000 that wasn't accounted for !! How can they miss an entire program on the books? State grant money at that - aren't there additional reporting requirements for that? What sort of nimrods are running this district ?!?
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.