Pro: Criticisms thinly veiled racist, sexist attempts to detract from her intelligence, pragmatism
WASHINGTON EDITOR’S NOTE: The writer is addressing the question, Did President Obama make a wise choice in nominating Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court?
The nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court is groundbreaking for a number of reasons and is a reaffirmation of the faith American voters displayed electing President Barack Obama.
Judge Sotomayor is widely respected by her colleagues, both liberal and conservative. While many of her rulings are left-leaning, they are not out of the mainstream. In fact, watchdog organizations that review judges call her a moderate.
Her initial nomination to the federal judiciary by a Republican president and bipartisan support on Capitol Hill through two separate hearings should put to shame those on the Right now shouting that old “liberal activist judge” mantra they haul out whenever they disagree with a ruling.
Let’s be honest. It’s really only the liberal part that works them up. They are fine with conservative activists such as Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas, who chip away at the laws our elected officials pass to prevent discrimination and give equal access to education; and who would have the government making our medical decisions, listening to our conversations and snooping into our bedrooms.
Judicial extremism is a two-way street and, after eight years of Bush appointees, they have no legs to stand on with that tired argument.
That’s likely why the only criticisms of Judge Sotomayor are thinly veiled racist and sexist attempts to undermine the fact that she is a smart, capable and pragmatic judge to whom no serious person could object.
They are saying she isn’t smart enough. They say she’s only been chosen to shore up President Obama’s support from Latino voters. They say that, because of her background, she would not uphold the U.S. Constitution. And Rush Limbaugh, scraping the bottom of even his rhetorical barrel, claims she’s a “reverse racist.”
What is truly remarkable about Judge Sotomayor is her story is exactly the sort of “boot straps” tale conservatives hail as our heart and soul.
If confirmed, she will be only the third woman to serve on the Court and the first Latina. She is also the first to grow up in public housing.
Her story is one of which all Americans should be proud. Born into a Puerto Rican family in the South Bronx, Sotomayor’s working mother taught her the power of a good education.
As a result of her hard work, Sotomayor was the valedictorian of her high school class and received a scholarship to Princeton, where she graduated summa cum laude. She eventually completed a law degree from Yale and served as editor of the Yale Law Journal. Smart enough for you? Certainly for us!
After graduating from law school, Sotomayor went into public service, becoming an assistant district attorney in Manhattan, where she tried dozens of serious criminal cases and was known as a “fearless and effective prosecutor.”
In 1992, she was appointed to the District Court for the Southern District of New York by the first President Bush and later to the U.S. Court of Appeals by President Clinton. That fact alone should underscore her bipartisan credentials.
Judge Sotomayor would bring more federal judicial experience to the Supreme Court than any justice in 100 years, and more overall judicial experience than anyone confirmed for the Court in the past 70 years.
Indeed, Judge Sotomayor’s record is exemplary. The cynical who think her nomination is about gathering political support from a growing block of voters fundamentally do not understand what this country is all about.
It is a place where anyone, no matter their beginnings, can work hard, achieve and expect to get a fair shake from their government. The United States is a diverse nation, and by appointing a Supreme Court justice who reflects that diversity, President Obama is ensuring justice is applied equally and fairly to all.
Amy F. Isaacs is the National Director of Americans for Democratic Action (www.adaaction.org), America’s largest and oldest independent liberal lobbying organization. Readers may write her at ADA, 1625 K St. NW, Suite 210, Washington, DC 20006.

Jun 12, 2009 at 8:45 a.m.
Suggest removal
How much longer are we going to let the Democratic Leadership continue to call legitimate questions racist or sexist in context. It is very tiring to hear them blame the other side time after time when ever they ask a question or attempt to do something. Please note that the Dem's are just as racist and sexist as they claim the other party is the only difference they are permited to get away with it.
May 30, 2009 at 11:46 a.m.
Suggest removal
If the winners of the past elections and their fans are so sure of their positions, then why do they feel the need to resort to such tactics as the writer of the above does? Maybe they realize that their political situation is tenuous and therefore their hold on power, weak. Or maybe they just can't break the habits of a lifetime. After all, character assassination is so much easier that clearly stating and defending a political position or appointment. And its even more fun when you can castigate opponents as character assassins!
May 29, 2009 at 5:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
"somehow I think arguing that the people who are losing all the elections lately are in the "mainstream" is the real oxymoron."
-
Who argued that point?
May 29, 2009 at 12:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
RAF, somehow I think arguing that the people who are losing all the elections lately are in the "mainstream" is the real oxymoron.
May 28, 2009 at 8:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
"many of her rulings are left-leaning, they are not out of the mainstream."
-
You couldn't find a better definition of an oxymoron if you tried.
May 28, 2009 at 3:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
Scalia said that the Appelate Courts, and other "minor" courts make law and "policy." Let`s get him off the Supreme Court! Alioto said his background and experience influence his thought processes and decisions on cases. Let`s boot him too!
May 28, 2009 at 1:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
This is a person who openly opposes the 2nd amendment rights of all Americans, Feels that whites can not be fair Judges and likes the idea of setting policy while on the bench...sorry no respect for those who have none for us. What is going on in Washington? where is the Common sense that we used to have years ago? Democrats and Republicans have got our country so screwed up. Its time to vote them all out and put in a Government of the People by the people for the people. Too many dirty dark secrets in Politics.
May 28, 2009 at 12:51 p.m.
Suggest removal
And so, the name-calling continues! Anyone who doesn't see this nominee as "justice" personified is racist, sexist, or simply too stupid to "understand" the issues. We conservatives have zero chance of stopping her ascension, regardless of our misgivings--yet the left is still reluctant to grant us the same freedom of speech they allow the Nazis or the KKK!
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.