Rehab bids over budget

By MARCIA NELESEN ( Contact )   Friday, May 8, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— City staff on Monday will ask the Janesville City Council to reject bids that came in more than double the budget to rehab a home at 189 S. High St.

The city bought the property as part of its Buy, Rehab, Resell program.

The budget for the project was $150,000 in community development block grant money to buy and rehab the property. The city paid $65,646 for the property, leaving $84,343 for rehabilitation.

Four contractors submitted bids, and the lowest bid was $175,359 from Drake Construction. The highest was Imperial Builders & Contractors for $266,848.

Staff proposes to revise the scope of the project, including eliminating plans to remove the exterior paint and reveal the original brick surface.

“Although aesthetically desirable, this appears to be cost prohibitive,” Kelly Lee, neighborhood development specialist, wrote in a memo.

Staff also figures to save money if the city acts as the general contractor. And the city will apply for grants to reduce the cost.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(5)
momof2
May 9, 2009 at 10:53 p.m.
Suggest removal

I can't believe they would spend that much on a house I've looked on house for sale they could have bought one a lot cheaper .

Roadmaster
May 9, 2009 at 2 p.m.
Suggest removal

Why not use RECAP program people to do the work, and let them learn some skills.

paperboy
May 9, 2009 at 12:14 p.m.
Suggest removal

Instead of buy, rehab and sell it should be buy(run down property and level it )Sell the empty lot to a private developer and let them build. That way the neighborhood could be rid of more dumps. The property the city bought isn't that bad of an eyesore or a problem house.

miltonalum
May 8, 2009 at 9:39 p.m.
Suggest removal

Drake construction are a bunch of hacks i hope the city doesnt go with them, personal experience.

janesvillean
May 8, 2009 at 5:13 p.m.
Suggest removal

Ouch. I know from experience that whatever you plan in rehab of a building is obsolete the moment you hammer the first nail, but I can't see how it could be this expensive unless the contractors uncovered serious structural defects. The point isn't to create a McMansion in the Fourth Ward, it's to bring the property back to code and basic residential standards so it can be sold as a single-family home. When you chop off the back wing, as they already have, you don't end up with all that large a building.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT