The conservative ‘happy warrior’

By DAVID BRODER   Thursday, May 7, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— On the very day last week that Jack Kemp, the former quarterback, congressman and 1996 vice presidential candidate, succumbed to cancer, other Republicans were honoring his example by launching a search for new ideas and broader constituencies.

Eric Cantor, the young Virginian who may come closest to Kemp’s level of intellectual ambition and political energy in the current Congress, played host at the first of a promised series of policy sessions, along with former Govs. Jeb Bush of Florida and Mitt Romney of Massachusetts.

Welcome as their enterprise is in a landscape notably barren of GOP ideas, they were a pale carbon copy of what Kemp provided for an earlier generation of Republicans.

In the understandable nostalgia for Ronald Reagan, who restored Republicans to the White House and led the final, successful stages of the Cold War, it’s been too easy to forget that for much of the 1970s and into the 1980s, it was the young Jack Kemp who fired up the grass roots on his weekend speaking forays and who gave a thoroughly beaten minority party the ammunition for its comeback—even as he built cherished friendships across the aisle.

Kemp was, in my judgment and in the eyes of many other reporters, one of the most consequential and likable politicians of that era.

His signal contribution was proselytizing for supply-side economics, the belief that lowering marginal tax rates would spur economic growth, replenish revenues, overcome deficits and fuel a widely shared prosperity.

He made that the centerpiece of the Reagan economic program and—as the ringleader of a talented group of backbenchers, including Trent Lott, Newt Gingrich, Dave Stockman and Vin Weber—challenged the Old Guard congressional leadership and set the stage for more than a decade of Republican ascendancy.

Those are the things for which his party owes Jack Kemp. As one who was never persuaded that Kemp was right in his economic theories, I came to value him for something more basic in human terms and far rarer among Republicans. As much as any public figure I have ever known, Kemp burned with a passion to make the American Dream real for everyone—without regard to race, religion or national origin.

A product of a middle-class California upbringing, a success as an athlete and therefore well-to-do, Kemp often said that he learned in the locker rooms of the San Diego Chargers and the Buffalo Bills that teamwork was colorblind.

He carried that belief into politics and was outspoken in denouncing those “country-club” Republicans who opposed affirmative action and supported restrictive immigration laws. That’s why he was campaigning for John McCain in South Carolina the last time I saw him.

Kemp was nothing if not conservative, but he believed that if those principles were valid, they must be tested and applied, not only in gated suburbia but in the inner cities. In Congress, he co-sponsored “enterprise zones” legislation with African-American and Hispanic Democrats. And as secretary of housing and urban development under the first President Bush, he drove the White House crazy, lobbying for programs to revive blighted areas that were no part of Bush’s constituency.

In an early profile of Kemp, I compared him to Hubert Humphrey—“long-winded, gregarious, super-energetic, overscheduled, optimistic, in love with ideas and people, ranging unconfined from issue to issue, an outsider who became part of the political establishment almost despite himself, a partisan battler who hates to hurt anyone’s feelings.”

He sent me a note thanking me for finding similarities to the Democrats’ happy warrior.

President Obama commends empathy, and Kemp had it in abundance. He and Bob Dole had quarreled bitterly about economic policy; Dole was never a supply-sider. But when Dole invited Kemp onto his ticket and made him his traveling companion, Kemp was moved by the simple courage Dole showed every day in coping with his grievous war wounds.

When I saw him in his hotel room at the San Diego convention, Kemp asked me, “What’s the first thing I do when I make a speech?”

“You take off your jacket and roll up your sleeves,” I said, having seen the ritual a hundred times.

“You know,” he said, “Dole’s wounds—he can’t even do that for himself.”

And Jack Kemp wept.

David Broder is a columnist for The Washington Post. Readers may write to him via e-mail at davidbroder@washpost.com.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(7)
SuperDave
May 15, 2009 at 11:49 a.m.
Suggest removal

wimom: I would have to agree with your second point! As to your question, well I can't prove a negative. I simply see no evidence that Republicans parse people into groups the way that the Democrats do.

wimom
May 13, 2009 at 3:52 a.m.
Suggest removal

SuperDave if I remember my history, the Republican party was created to abolish slavery, how can you generalize a whole policital party of Americans? The Republican party and Democratic party believe in the American dream, but I believe that there are indiviuduals in both parties who have no regard for anything or anyone besides power.

onevoice
May 7, 2009 at 10:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

In the end, I wonder which is better. A centrist who pretends to be more conservative to get elected, or a leftist who pretends to be more centrist??

whythink
May 7, 2009 at 10:52 a.m.
Suggest removal

More conservative than their actual belief system, yes.
+
Obama is very liberal and wasn't going to win a general campaign being "very liberal."
McCain is a moderate, and some conservatives wouldn't have shown if he didn't "move right" with his campaign.
+
If McCain had stayed true to himself Obama would have struggled more to seperate himself, been forced to stay more liberal and it may have cost him the election. The "Maverick" McCain is much more appealing to me than the Hannity loves me, McCain.
+
I know conservatives scream we ran a moderate campaign and lost...we need to stay more conservative to win.
+
I disagree, I believe which every candidate can appear moderate is likely to win because the other candidate will need to stay either conservative or liberal. I believe most in this country are moderate.
+
Obama ran the more moderate campaign and won.
Just what I saw.

onevoice
May 7, 2009 at 10:18 a.m.
Suggest removal

whythink - Thought provoking comment comparing McCain and Obama. So would we agree that both McCain and Obama assumed there was a benefit in running a more conservative campaign?
+
Say "Hi" for me and keep up the good work there.

whythink
May 7, 2009 at 9:23 a.m.
Suggest removal

Come on, both sides do that.
+
Both sides have a test to see if you have the correct belief system to be a Republican or Democrat.
+
This is one of the biggest problems with our political system, you have to be one or the other...rarely can someone with "mixed views" make it to the bigtime.
+
The day someone from this party makes it, the country will be better for it.
http://www.americancentristparty.net/ind...
+
McCain was a centrist, until he was nominated to run for President. Obama was a centrist, until he was elected president. Unfortunately, both eventually sold out to their party and forgot their principles.
+
This happens to often.
+
J. Kemp was a good man and should be remembered for his positive impact to this country.

SuperDave
May 7, 2009 at 9:01 a.m.
Suggest removal

"As one who was never persuaded that Kemp was right in his economic theories, I came to value him for something more basic in human terms and far rarer among Republicans. As much as any public figure I have ever known, Kemp burned with a passion to make the American Dream real for everyone—without regard to race, religion or national origin". Huh?!? Republicans do not regard race, religion or national origin as a prerequisite for persuing the American Dream, that comment is completely out of left field (no pun intended). If anything, it's the Democrats who constantly make these things the issue with their identity politics. And for the record, I am neither D or R.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT