Goals common among school board candidates

By FRANK SCHULTZ ( Contact )   Tuesday, March 10, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

On TV


The Janesville School Board candidates forum will be shown on Janesville cable channels 96 and 993 at midnight, 3 a.m., 6 a.m., 9 a.m., noon, 3 p.m., 6 p.m., and 9 p.m. Friday.

— Balance the budget.

That's the top priority, most of the candidates for Janesville School Board seemed to agree in a forum Monday night.

On the other hand, you've got to provide a top-notch education. No one disagreed with that.

And, of course, you can't ignore the needs of taxpayers in this difficult economy, the candidates said.

So how do they differ? What would they do to balance the budget while considering the needs of Janesville's children and taxpayers?

Very little was said about that at the forum, sponsored by the League of Women Voters and Janesville Area Council PTA.

Four incumbents and four challengers are running for five seats on the school board.

The forum, held at the Educational Services Center, was broadcast live on Janesville cable TV. Viewers were invited to call in their questions. No one did.

Divining differences between the eight candidates was nearly impossible most of the night. Here's how the candidates tried to stand out:

Tom Lemmer, challenger: Everyone else on the panel agreed that financial problems are the district's top issue right now, but Lemmer spun his answer differently.

The No. 1 issue facing students is the district's growing poverty, Lemmer said.

"That's one issue I really take personally … We've got to pull our resources together because they are our future," Lemmer said of the students.

"I don't want to see anyone left behind because they can't afford taxes," Lemmer added

Diedre Richard, challenger: She came out strongly for a zero-increase budget in 2009-10. She said that's what people are asking for.

Richard also seemed to lean toward hiring an internal candidate to be the next superintendent. Richard said superintendents tend to stay for three to five years, and if an outsider takes a year to settle in, "I think that argues very much against going outside."

Richard might not get a chance to make that choice, however. The board plans to name a superintendent before the new board takes over in late April.

Greg Ardrey, incumbent: He stood out as being tough on taxes: "We can't lay an additional burden on families."

Ardrey was adamant that core academics are his priority. He said he grew up in a school district where extracurricular activities were cut, but he managed to get a great education, anyway.

No candidate hinted at cutting sports.

When Ardrey was asked about extracurriculars, he said he would never vote to erode "basic academics" and that sports teams should be given more flexibility to raise money.

Peter D. Severson, incumbent: "We can't allow ourselves to provide a second-rate education here just because the economy is bad."

And yet, the board has to walk a fine line as it considers the needs of taxpayers.

Peter Severson said that after last year's acrimonious teacher contract negotiations, the most important thing in upcoming negotiations is to find a way to work in harmony.

Karl Dommershausen, challenger: He seemed to criticize the current board, which he said "economized" on "necessary teaching items" in recent years.

Dommershausen said afterward that he was referring to books the board has delayed buying and broken desks that need replacing.

Dommershausen said the board's job is to find ways to make do with scarce dollars and to provide a high quality education despite budget problems.

Jim Farrell, challenger: He said his strong suit is dealing with precisely the financial problems the district is facing.

Farrell is controller for Orchid International in Monroe.

"I know what it is to deal with scarce resources. I know what it is to deal with people whose jobs may be at risk," Farrell said.

Farrell, the husband of a Whitewater High School teacher, suggested that money is not the most important thing when it comes to motivating teachers, and he said he doesn't anticipate the teachers union will ask for too much when it comes to the bargaining table this spring.

Lori Stottler, incumbent: She said the next superintendent should be a strong communicator who makes student achievement the top priority.

Stottler also said that as the daughter of a union organizer, she is sympathetic to unions, but she said the teachers union should be thinking about ways to change its "cafeteria" health plan.

DuWayne Severson, incumbent: He is no relation to Peter and is the current school board president. He came down heavily in favor of a new charter school to teach a foreign language to elementary students. He said such services could help attract new people to Janesville.

The other candidates seemed to agree, at least partially, although some were more cautious in endorsing it, citing the cost amidst the current budget difficulties.

DuWayne Severson also called for "corporate sponsorships" to help the district pay for athletics.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(8)
beenthere
Mar 10, 2009 at 5:35 p.m.
Suggest removal

gpwoman,

AMEN

Happy2BAlive

I can think of several current board members that not only want the attention, they usually demand it. You are correct they don't get paid for serving, but then in this case maybe we get what we pay for.

Happy2BAlive
Mar 10, 2009 at 4:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

crunch_munch...I agree with Cathy924 - you should throw your hat in the ring so you can feel the thanklessness of dedication scoffed and scorned!
-
What you've always 'got' has been a first class educational system that promotes academics, builds community and offers diversity. Compare Janesville's School District nationally and you'll eat your words and see that they do very well with students and dollars. The previous boards, administration and staff (who do most of the heavy lifting) have done a stellar job of preserving education and providing offerings that compliment global learning today!
-
The current board has the passion and determination to go from good to great; and you might be reminded that they don't receive one red penny for their time and I don't know one of them that do it for the attention, since most of the attention comes from negative nellies like yourself!

Cathy924
Mar 10, 2009 at 1:16 p.m.
Suggest removal

crunchmunch, if you're not happy with the selection, consider throwing your hat in the ring at the next election.

gpwoman
Mar 10, 2009 at 10:03 a.m.
Suggest removal

In my opinion, none of the present Board incumbents should be re-elected. They have made a shambles of a once well-run district by micromanaging the district and its administrators into the ground. Add that to the shameless way they ousted a fine superintendent and things should be very clear to the voters. Pay attention, Janesville residents. Your school district had an excellent reputation and now - not so much.

lakennedy
Mar 10, 2009 at 9:44 a.m.
Suggest removal

I'd like to hear more about Duwayne Severson's "corporate sponsorships."

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT