Oil industry cranks up lobbying effort

By JOHN PORRETTO   Friday, June 19, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Photo

In this file photo taken Aug. 19, 2008, the Chevron Genesis Oil Rig Platform in the Gulf of Mexico near New Orleans, La. is seen. The petroleum industry spent $44.5 million lobbying Congress and federal agencies during the first three months of 2009, putting it on pace to shatter last year's record tab of $129 million.

— Oil and gas companies have accelerated their spending on lobbying faster than any other industry, training their gusher of profits on Washington to fight new taxes on drilling and slow efforts to move the nation off fossil fuels.

The industry spent $44.5 million lobbying Congress and federal agencies in the first three months of this year, on pace to shatter last year's record. Only the drug industry spent more.

Last year's total of $129 million was up 73 percent from two years earlier. That's a faster clip than any other major industry, according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics.

From the late 1990s through the first half of this decade, the oil industry spent roughly $50 million to $60 million a year on lobbying. It ramped up lobbying in 2006, when Democrats retook Congress, and further as President Barack Obama took office.

"They're under attack, they're ramping up their operations and they've got money to spend," said Tyson Slocum, who runs the energy program at watchdog group Public Citizen. "They're in much better position than other industries to draw upon financial resources for their lobbying effort."

Billions of dollars in oil profits in recent years have made the industry a target for new and higher taxes on exploration and drilling. Oil companies and refiners are also trying to blunt the impact of costly climate change legislation pushed by Obama.

While most oil and gas executives acknowledge the nation needs cleaner energy, they say lawmakers are misguided about how quickly it can happen. They warn that taxes and tighter rules on exploration could cripple the industry before new technology is developed.

Complex issues like that "require additional communication and effort to ensure lawmakers understand our positions," said Alan Jeffers, a spokesman for Exxon Mobil Corp., the world's largest publicly traded oil company.

Exxon Mobil was the biggest spender in the first quarter, pumping $9.3 million into Washington — three times what it spent a year ago, according to House disclosure reports.

In its House filing, Exxon noted it lobbied on high-profile topics like climate and tax legislation as well as provisions regarding the chemical industry, education and health care.

Combined, the three largest U.S. oil companies — Exxon, Chevron Corp. and ConocoPhillips — spent about $22 million on lobbying in the first quarter. Smaller, independent companies that produce the bulk of the nation's crude and natural gas are spending millions, too.

They're spending more even as profits have subsided. The big three U.S. oil companies spent just $12.4 million on lobbying in the fourth quarter.

First-quarter spending on lobbying by the oil industry trailed only drugmakers and health products companies, which spent $66.6 million.

"I can tell you, I've had substantially more visits than usual," said Rep. Gene Green, whose south Texas district is in the heart of oil country. Among his callers, he said, have been representatives of ConocoPhillips and Exxon Mobil to discuss climate-change legislation and other matters.

To a degree, the investment appears to be paying off. On Wednesday, a Senate committee voted to lift a ban on drilling across a vast area in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. The provision, which the industry pushed for, is included in a bill that would expand the use of renewable energy sources such as wind and solar. The bill now goes to the full Senate.

Democrats from oil states have also managed to get rid of a provision in an anti-pollution bill that would have required refiners to meet a standard on low-carbon motor fuel. Refiners say the bill would still be devastating to business.

Most major industries have increased what they spend on lobbying, but no one has done so at a faster clip over the past two years than oil and gas companies, according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics.

The enormous amount of money funneled to Washington by energy companies comes after some members of Congress suggested slapping the big oil companies with a windfall profits tax last year, when Americans were seething over $4-a-gallon gas.

Democrats — who also took the majority of state legislatures and governorships in 2006 — traditionally have not been as cozy with the oil sector as Republicans, and the energy lobby has spent the past few years trying to make inroads.

"You'll often see a correlation between spending and an industry or company that's in the hot seat," said Sheila Krumholz, the Center for Responsive Politics' executive director. "That will be enough to get them to hire additional guns and direct more money to lobbying."

Sean Brodrick, a natural resources analyst at Weiss Research Inc., cited the coal lobby as an example of one that's already had some success with the Obama administration.

He noted a futuristic coal-burning power plant in Illinois that languished under the Bush administration has now found favor with Obama Energy Secretary Steven Chu. The Energy Department will commit more than $1 billion to the project under an agreement announced last week.

"I think (the Obama administration) will make some accommodations," Brodrick said. "They may speak really tough before these laws are enacted, but you watch, I bet the energy companies will have some effect in actually shaping how these laws finally come out of the big sausage factory."

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(8)
AndrewJackson
Jun 20, 2009 at 10:45 a.m.
Suggest removal

Yes, the air and water ARE cleaner. But not clean. The post before was arguing that there is a QUESTION of pollution. I was just pointing out the obvious.

MrScott
Jun 20, 2009 at 10:30 a.m.
Suggest removal

AndrewJackson - air and water are much cleaner today than they were a decade or two ago. Air and water pollution isn't the major potential problem, its the introduction of greenhouse gasses into the atmosphere.

AndrewJackson
Jun 19, 2009 at 2:38 p.m.
Suggest removal

Fly into Washington, Los Angeles, New York or any other city of the world for that matter. You look down and think, "I'm going to be breathing THAT air!" The rest of this fight is immaterial!

AndrewJackson
Jun 19, 2009 at 11 a.m.
Suggest removal

Because you've invested "a good chunk" of your money in oil companies, you have profited from the continued pollution of the planet. How nice. If people would subsidize green energy instead of fossil fuels maybe we wouldn't "need oil for several more decades". Nobody, other than a small percentage of the population, seems to care that we are severely damaging our most basic resources, air and water. It's people like you who throw up their arms and say we can't do the green thing is the prevalent problem. When anyone with an ounce of sense knows that someday sun and wind WILL be the predominent soures of power. The only thing that is holding us back is the attitude that it is a long way there. It's not near as far off as people think. Note to Obama: If you want to be thought of and remembered FOREVER as the greatest President EVER, start susidizing green energy heavy and unrelenting. Get us off of fossil fuels and clean up our environment.

kinsohn
Jun 19, 2009 at 7:13 a.m.
Suggest removal

Because I knew the country would need oil for several more decades, I invested a good chunk of my IRA in oil companies. But because Obama and the rest of his left-wing minions would see any returns I got from those investments as "unfair" and consequently take them from me by increasing taxes on the companies I invest in, I decided to invest in foreign oil companies. The investments have done quiet well! Unfortunately, at a macro level, this means that a lot of investment is going overseas instead of staying here in America and creating jobs and tax revenue. I guess that's what our leadership wants, though.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT