$25 check may cost you food stamps

By MATT APUZZO   Monday, June 15, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Photo

Mark Milota is dealing with unemployment at his Marietta, Ga., home Thursday, June 11, 2009, and is no longer eligible for food stamps due to the $25 stimulus increase in unemployment benefits which began in March. Milota was hoping to find work and did not apply for food stamps until March, just after the stimulus increase went into effect, when his savings started to run out and bills started to be paid with credit cards.

— When President Barack Obama increased unemployment benefits as part of his economic stimulus, he also made some Americans ineligible for hundreds of dollars a month in food stamps.

Under the economic recovery plan, laid-off workers have seen a $25 weekly bump in their unemployment checks as part of a broad expansion of benefits for the poor. But the law did not raise the income cap for food stamp eligibility, so the extra money has pushed some people over the limit.

Laid-off workers and state officials are only now realizing the quirk, a consequence of pushing a $787 billion, 400-page bill through Congress and into law in three weeks.

And for people hurt by the change, there's no way around it.

"Everybody tells you, 'Yeah, I can understand why you're frustrated. It doesn't sound right.' But nobody knows where to go," said Mark Milota, 47, of Marietta, Ga., who was laid off in November from his job at a medical billing company.

The Georgia Department of Human Resources explained in a letter to him last month that, because of the stimulus, he was ineligible for food stamps. He now makes $1,538 a month — $21 too much for a family of two to qualify.

"We have to pay him that $25 a week," said Brenda Brown, assistant commissioner at the Georgia Department of Labor. "And he doesn't have the option not to accept it."

Milota said he was told that, without the stimulus money, he would have received about $300 a month in food stamps.

"I'm doing things I've never done before: I'm going to food pantries. I've gone to places for assistance on bills," Milota said. "Some bills are just not being paid. I'm three months behind on my mortgage."

Unemployment benefits vary by state and the income cap for food stamps also varies based on family size, so it's impossible to say for certain how many people are hurt by the change. Government officials believe it is only a small fraction of the record 6.8 million people on unemployment. Many more people will benefit from a stimulus law that expanded unemployment and food stamp benefits.

"We've gotten some questions about this. Not tons and tons, but we have been getting questions about this," said Jean Daniel, a spokeswoman for the Department of Agriculture, which overseas the food stamp program now known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

When cases like Milota's began popping up in Iowa recently, officials called Washington, asking what to do.

"We were told we were interpreting the food stamp regulations correctly," said Roger Munns, spokesman for the Iowa Department of Human Services. "Once you're over the income limit, regardless of the reason, you're no longer eligible."

Once handed out as paper vouchers, food stamps are now delivered to people near the poverty level through debit cards that they can use to buy food. A record 32.5 million people participate in the program. Once the government determines someone is eligible, officials use a formula to calculate the monthly benefit, which ranges from $16 to $588. The average is about $111.

Because those close to the income limit tend to get less money in food stamps, Munns said most people who are bumped out of the program by the extra $100 in unemployment benefits each month will break even or fare just slightly better. But the stimulus checks were intended to ease the effects of the recession, not simply cancel out another government assistance program.

Lawmakers crafting the stimulus knew this would become a problem, said Stacy Dean, director of food assistance policy at Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a liberal think tank. They could have headed it off by raising the income tax or declaring that the $25 stimulus checks would not affect food stamp eligibility. Both were expensive options that could have forced states to reprogram their computer systems.

But more importantly, hashing out those details would have taken time.

"People were aware of this but, as you recall, the stimulus was moving along and then it was passed in about a day," Dean said. "There was not a lot of policy discussion on this."

Milota said he had never been on food stamps before and resisted applying for months, believing he would find a job. But that has proved difficult. When he applied for a customer service job recently, he said the company told him there were 1,000 applicants.

The stimulus law was intended not just as a jolt to the economy but also to ease the burden on people in Milota's situation. Besides unemployment benefits, the law also increased food stamp benefits — just not the income cap.

"I truly believe when it came out, they felt it was to help people, and they never wanted to hurt people," said Milota, who says he leans Republican but voted for Obama.

Officials in Washington say they're aware of stories like this. Changing things, however, requires changing the law. States could do this one by one, or Congress could do so.

"This is not something the president or this agency could do independently," Daniel, the Agriculture Department spokeswoman, said.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(6)
Mikki
Jun 16, 2009 at 4:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

Nope, he didn't lose $200 in "food money".
tj24, please research the topic a little more before you type. It will make you look less ignorant than you really are.

dvlwmn13
Jun 16, 2009 at 4 p.m.
Suggest removal

tj24-- The food share program is a federally run program. The counties and states issue the benefits but the rules and regs come from the federal govt. therefore, the $25 increase in Unemployment is federal as well as FoodShare regs. So no matter what state you are in you would be eligible for the same foodshare benefits and the same policies apply. Sorry to say I am well educated in this field. But thanks for trying to correct me before you studied up on the policies

msleo
Jun 15, 2009 at 10:15 p.m.
Suggest removal

The guy in this story brings home 1,538 a month. There are two people in his family. I raised my daughter on less than 1,200 a month and never got a penny in welfare. I think this guy spends beyond his means if he needs 300 a month in food stamps!

tj24
Jun 15, 2009 at 5:16 p.m.
Suggest removal

You do realize that that the guy in the story lives in GEORGIA, not Wisconsin right? And that FoodShare and unemployment are state regulated so the rules there certainly could be different than what YOU think they are. I highly doubt that he's lying. Why would he? Plus the gov't has already said it is an issue just not for everyone....

Good Grief! Read the article ok? Feel bad that the guy doesn't know how to feed himself and his family. Besides either way you look at it, he still LOST 200 bucks in food money...

bebe19284
Jun 15, 2009 at 2:43 p.m.
Suggest removal

Let's just remember that SNAP is meant to be a supplement to your food budget, NOT the ENTIRE food budget as many rely it to be. If you have kids you should likely have even more money for food since you're likely receiving free medical care as well.
I wonder if the extra $$ in people's pockets have actually done any good?!?! Most seem to hardly make ends meet even with the extra $100 a month.

dvlwmn13
Jun 15, 2009 at 1:19 p.m.
Suggest removal

There are so many things wrong with this article it is ridiculous! First, the $25 a week in unemployment a person gets each month is convereted into $107.50 (25 X4.3) a month. This is EXTRA income coming into the household that is considered part of someones food budget. This is more money that they could be using to put food on thier tables. Second, the government did not do this to people to close them out of programs. this was seen as a way to boost the economy. The example that was used for Mr. Milota was EXTREMELY wrong! The $107.50 in Unemployment income he receives would not have closed him out if he was due to receive $300 a month in FoodShare. The highest benefit a family of two can receive is $367 a month and that is based on income, expenses, and disregards( a very complicated math equation). This man has the WRONG information. I wish that more research would be done before writting a story like this.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT