Family plants Janesville’s first green development

By MARCIA NELESEN ( Contact )   Sunday, July 5, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

To learn more


For more information, go to fishercreekneighborhood.com.

PhotoVideo


Much of the land located south-east of the intersection of S. Austin Rd and W. Court St., just outside of the City of Janesville, is slated to become a planned community development.

Much of the land located south-east of the intersection of S. Austin Rd and W. Court St., just outside of the City of Janesville, is slated to become a planned community development.

— The Austins’ love for their land was the seed for the city’s first green development.

Maxine Austin gets tears in her eyes when she talks about the 80-acre farm on Janesville’s west side that cradles the wonderful memories of her childhood.

But she and her siblings, Doug and Wilbur, believe development is inevitable. The city already surrounds the land’s outside perimeters.

The family didn’t want to sell to a typical developer to create typical suburban sprawl, she said.

“We’re not looking at big, fertilized lawns eating up farmland and big mansions with three- to four-car garages,” Maxine said. “We’re just not into that.

“We would like to do it right. We’d like to be an example to other developers.

“This whole project is a labor of love.”

Welcome to the Fisher Creek Neighborhood.

The development between West Court Street and Rockport Road is in Phase 1. Conservancy Ridge has five lots available for sale on a cul-de-sac west of Fisher Creek at the end of Falcon Ridge Drive.

The second phase continues to evolve and likely will include about 150 homes on the 80 acres east of the creek. The segments eventually would be connected by a trail.

One only has to look north to see the differences between a traditional subdivision to the one being proposed by the Austins.

At Arbor Ridge off County A, for instance, an association must approve solar panels. Owners must grow grass and kill weeds. Clotheslines are forbidden, and attached garages required.

At Conservancy Ridge, three alternative energy systems are required, and a solar panel is one of them. Grass is frowned upon and creeping Charlie welcomed. Clotheslines are encouraged. Detached garages are preferred to increase the sense of community.

Arbor Ridge has a minimum footprint required for homes, while Conservancy Ridge has a maximum.

The covenants for the lower Fisher Creek Neighborhood are being developed but would be similar.

“We want to make this greener than any other subdivision. Ever,” Maxine said.

Duane Cherek of Janesville’s community development department said Janesville doesn’t have a similar conservation subdivision.

“This would be absolutely new for Janesville,” he said.

“What’s interesting, in this housing market, is that they’re applying those fairly restrictive conditions,” Cherek said. “Obviously, the market for those lots would be with individuals who clearly have environmentalism in mind. ... I don’t know what the market is for that.”

Maxine said she hopes Janesville is ready for it.

“I think that a lot of people are going to start looking at alternatives with the economy like it is and heating costs going through the roof,” she said.

Maxine and her brothers were raised on the farm, skating on the frozen fields in winter and swimming in Fisher Creek in the summer. They rode horses and brought the dairy cows in from pasture. She remembers the 300 apple trees and the extended family picnics, where the women wore dresses and the kids ran around, playing like crazy.

“I feel very privileged to have been raised on a farm,” Maxine said. “It’s a wonderful way to grow up. With the animals and wide, open spaces, there was always something to do, something to explore.”

The family wants to preserve as much of that feeling as possible.

The family’s Web site says they want to “restore and protect our family farm’s natural features and carry on our family’s vision of strong connections between a community of people and the land around them.

“The dream is to create a beautiful, diverse, walkable neighborhood with affordable housing, large natural common spaces and a vibrant ‘village’ center. We will encourage high quality, environmentally-friendly architectural, energy, and landscaping practices.”

They envision clustering 150 small lots, all fronting public green space. They would disturb as little of the topsoil as possible and conserve what is dug up.

“It’s good dirt, fabulous, wonderful dirt,” Maxine said. “This whole area is bottom land.”

The development would provide space for residents to grow food.

Plans also stress storm-water management.

A narrow ditch used to carry water into Fisher Creek, causing erosion, Maxine said. The Austins donated a 150-foot greenbelt to dissipate the water over a wider area and allow it to percolate. About 25 of the 80 acres are in the flood plain.

Rain gardens and natural plantings will be required.

The family’s goal hopes that such businesses as a coffee shop, day care center and even a small grocery would locate in the neighborhood.

“We even think of having some sort of elderly transition that would be part of the community,” said Cheryl Austin, Lancaster, who is married to Wilbur.

Almost every week we come up with some ideas,” Cheryl said.

For instance, they are investigating a central power and heating source for the neighborhood.

The five lots on Conservancy Ridge are for sale now. The family will sell those lots before they move to the lower development.

The family sold about five acres on the corner of Austin Road and West Court Street to the owners of the Whitcomb-Lynch-Albrecht Funeral Homes, and they have embraced the family’s green principles, Cheryl said. Gerry Lynch said they will plant at least 3 acres of prairie grass to manage the site’s storm water. He hopes to build walking paths through the prairie and attract birds.

Maxine said the family did not want to sell the farm and risk ending up with a substandard development on Austin land.

Still, doing it themselves is a daunting process.

“I didn’t know what I was getting myself into,” Maxine said.

But she looks at it as her legacy.

“It’s for my dad and my grandfather, my mom, my aunts and uncles—all the people who were vested in this land,” she said.

Conservancy Ridge covenants include:

-- The owner is required to select a minimum of three alternative approaches for energy production and/or conservation from this list: active solar system; passive solar system; solar hot water system; high efficiency furnace and air conditioner; photovoltaics; wind turbine technology; geothermal; and green roof systems.

-- The owner is required to maintain a landscape that is healthy for all living creatures. Native plants are to be used, manicured lawns are to be minimal and storm-water runoff is to be managed on site with rains gardens, barrels, cisterns and other natural methods. Rain gardens should be planted with native prairie plants with deep root systems to allow the water to infiltrate quickly into the ground.

“This will allow the groundwater to be replenished and the springs that feed Fisher Creek to continue to flow. The intent is that all runoff during a normal rainfall will infiltrate into the ground very close to where it falls and not run into the valley causing erosion and water pollution.”

-- Driveways must be of pervious materials such as brick or concrete pavers.

-- Homes may not exceed a maximum footprint of 2,000 square feet including garage. There is no minimum footprint requirement.

-- Owners can have a maximum of two garage doors.

-- Homes must meet or exceed Energy Star Certification.

-- Homes must be Wisconsin Green Built certified.

-- Owners are strongly encouraged to design the residence to meet accessibility design guidelines.

-- LED technology is encouraged.

-- The builder must use super-insulated framing, insulated concrete forms or alternative construction, such as straw or an earth shelter.

-- Construction materials and finishes are encouraged to be certified sustainable, Forest Stewardship Council, Greenguard, low toxity, have a majority of recycled content and be regional in origin.

-- Specific trees, bushes, shrubs and ground covers that can be used are listed.

“Lawns are to be a very small part of the landscape and should be used as accents and edging of outdoor spaces such as walkways and patios. Choose low maintenance fescues and bluegrass varieties to eliminate the need for irrigation, chemical pesticides and fertilizers and frequent mowing. Healthy lawns include clover, violets, creeping Charlie, dandelions, spring bulbs such as sicilia, crocuses and daffodils and other plants not usually seen on golf courses. No turf grass may be used in any area having a slope greater than 25 percent.”

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(27)
tmailone
Jul 12, 2009 at 11:27 a.m.
Suggest removal

Next to no information on pricing for anything
and nothing on their web sight

proartist
Jul 7, 2009 at 12:34 p.m.
Suggest removal

Isn't there already more than enough residential housing in the area to meet needs? "Bigger and better" isn't always so. The only way to truly be "green" is to leave the land alone and work to conserve it. No matter how conscientiously it's done, it is always far wiser to recycle and reuse existing buildings before destroying more land with sprawl.

whoanellie
Jul 7, 2009 at 11:35 a.m.
Suggest removal

Because they are developing it any way that means they do care about the "almighty dollar". If they didn't they would leave it in the natural. but the word "Green" is PC right now and that will draw a certain crowd there, namely people with money! what more will we fall for??!!

MadeinUSA
Jul 7, 2009 at 11:29 a.m.
Suggest removal

"Conservancy Ridge"?! You're kidding right? A conservancy would be there to CONSERVE the land, NOT develop it! Very cute litle spin on conserving land that is being developed, but it's a no-go.

MrScott
Jul 7, 2009 at 10:29 a.m.
Suggest removal

The problem is, its going to get developed whether they want it developed or not. If the surrounding land is developed, eventually certain laws come into play which would force the landowner to sell the land and probably at much less of a price than if they were to develop it now or sell it.

partarican1
Jul 7, 2009 at 10:26 a.m.
Suggest removal

They should not develop it at all; keep the land and the creek pristine. Who said they had to develop the land? Developers that don't understand the value of natural areas?

MikeF
Jul 6, 2009 at 5:45 p.m.
Suggest removal

hannah- The restriction states "Homes may not exceed a maximum footprint of 2,000 square feet including garage". This means the physical ground space used. I stand by my numbers.

spikesmom
Jul 6, 2009 at 2:42 p.m.
Suggest removal

What a concept. Landowners that actually care more about the integrity of their than they do about the almighty dollar. Way to go!

Purrmaid
Jul 6, 2009 at 1:24 p.m.
Suggest removal

Kudos to the Austins. Instead of just talking about it, they're actually doing it. Am looking forward to future articles on the progress. My 70+ years old mother has several acres in the Johnstown area...would love it if most of it could be preserved in as "green" a state as possible for future dwellers.

TCB
Jul 6, 2009 at 12:36 p.m.
Suggest removal

This is the beauty of a free market economy. If like minded people wish to build/buy with these restrictiona this is their choice. Good luck.

The risk is the development fails under these restrictions and those who are quick to build/buy in this developement face future property assesments to maintain a green lifestyle.

Another feature of the free market economy is that what is considered green today-may not meet that definition in the next few years. So while Ms Austin wishes to be an example to other developers-a noble jesture, other developers can choose to incorporate similar green features into future developments. The bottom line is that the consumer benefits from competition.

However, if being green was truly the end goal, Ms. Austin and the owners of the land could have placed a conservation easement on the property.

jeddaustin
Jul 6, 2009 at 12:32 p.m.
Suggest removal

I get your points about how refurbishing old communities is "greener" than developing new ones, but the Austins didn't have an old community to refurbish. They had this beautiful land with a creek meandering through it. Their options were to sell it to a developer who would have bull-dozed over it to make way for another cookie-cutter, money-driven development with minimal consideration of environmental impact, or to keep it and figure out how to develop it themselves, with a strong commitment to minimizing environmental impact and maximizing use of energy-efficient technologies/concepts in the resulting community. It seems to me that the whole point of this development is to, while realizing that development is inevitable, preserve the integrity of this land that has a great deal of sentimental value to so many people. If it succeeds and can stand as a precedent for how to do planned/green communities around the country, then hopefully other developers (who are hesitant to attempt something like this) will see how well it can be done, and the benefits will (long-term) do a whole lot more good than fixing up an old neighborhood would have. There are lots of progressive, radical ideas here (especially in this economy) and it won’t be easy, but if we can all help spread the word and draw attention to this project, we’ll find that there are many people out there who have been waiting years for this sort of thing to come along. I think people will be lining up to support and do what they can to help this project succeed!

MikeF
Jul 6, 2009 at 12:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

partarican1- clotheslines are forbidden in Arbor Ridge, which many people call "Hendricks' subdivision". They are encouraged in the Austin one.
zoom- I did some math on my house and the total footprint is 1600. That means that I could build another 2 car garage and still be within the 2000 max. Also, my 3 bedroom house is all on one floor. If I went up, I could have more floor space without impacting the outside footprint. I selected a random house on Wuthering Hills that is assessed at 170K and has a 1800 foot floor and 800 garage. It is all one floor, so you only have to move 600 square feet upstairs and that will meet the max footage. I think 2000 square feet footprint is doable.

partarican1
Jul 6, 2009 at 11:31 a.m.
Suggest removal

Why are clotheslines fobidden? Isn't it more eco-friendly to air dry clothes? Also, creating a new subdivision is not eco-friendly no matter how you do it. Restoring an already existing neighborhood is by far more eco-friendly.

backyarder1
Jul 6, 2009 at 11:22 a.m.
Suggest removal

Excellent project. More people need to follow in the footsteps of this very environmentally aware family.

Betsy S. Franz
http://thenaturelady.blogspot.com/

Zoom
Jul 6, 2009 at 9:42 a.m.
Suggest removal

Great idea, but a 2000 square feet footprint with garage is small for the folks who will be able to afford all the building restrictions. Hope it works though.

SHB_ICF
Jul 6, 2009 at 9:07 a.m.
Suggest removal

I like the idea. I have never been fond of HOA's because of their strict rules on how to build and what you have to do in order to satisfy them. But i am a supporter of building a sustainable development. I am actually working on starting my own company that is based on sustainable home building with Insulated Concrete Forms and this is a project that i would love to be involved in.

not2crazeeyet
Jul 6, 2009 at 8:11 a.m.
Suggest removal

I am impressed! It's time a neighborhood that doesn't think heavy use of chemicals in the spring is a good idea springs to life. BRAVO

casey
Jul 6, 2009 at 1:13 a.m.
Suggest removal

If ignorance is bliss then Rooster is an extremely blissful person.

rooster
Jul 5, 2009 at 10:51 p.m.
Suggest removal

the project is a labor of cash flow using the politically (in)correct globing warming theory to market their properties. after all, al gore has made hundreds of millions on his global warming enterprise investments.

onelife2live
Jul 5, 2009 at 10:42 p.m.
Suggest removal

cool story, thanks Gazette, I never said that before,

oldestofthree
Jul 5, 2009 at 10:29 p.m.
Suggest removal

Kudos to this family. Most people would take the money & run!

goarmy
Jul 5, 2009 at 6:30 p.m.
Suggest removal

who wants to go throw all the trouble.

janesvillean
Jul 5, 2009 at 6:10 p.m.
Suggest removal

What a fantastic proposal. I seriously respect their guts in going through with it in this real estate market. It would still probably be much easier to simply find a developer who would maximize their immediate value. Starting with five lots is a cautious first step, and I hope successful. If I had the money I would definitely consider it; I'm going to have to settle for "greening" a property I own instead.

anotherdoor
Jul 5, 2009 at 5:07 p.m.
Suggest removal

That sounds like someplace I'd like to live. But, for me, part of conservation is "recycling" existing homes.

Coppertop
Jul 5, 2009 at 4:42 p.m.
Suggest removal

I used to work these fields for Howard and Franklin Austin. I felt a part of me went when seeing housing development in locations that were once fields I helped with harvesting crop. It's great to see that from here on out, some of the land will be used towards green development.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT