Schools hopeful of stimulus, but with questions

By FRANK SCHULTZ ( Contact )   Thursday, Jan. 29, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

PhotoVideo

— Janesville public school officials say they'll wait with open arms to receive millions of dollars proposed as part of the economic stimulus bill making its way through Congress.

At the same time, they would like to know whether they'll be given the flexibility to spend it in a way that's best for local needs.

"Traditionally, federal government programs have not created great flexibility. They've been very pigeonholed, and it's a cliché to say it, but the devil is in the details on this," Superintendent Tom Evert said this morning.

The House passed its stimulus bill Wednesday, but funding still needs approval in the Senate and from President Obama. A House committee Wednesday released estimates of funding for every school district in the country.

The money would help Janesville with its projected school budget shortfall, but it's too early to say whether it would totally solve the problem, Evert said.

The proposed school funding would come in three categories: Title 1, IDEA and construction.

Title 1 is a program that gives extra attention to the academic needs of students in schools with large low-income populations.

IDEA is the Individuals with Disabilities Act, which funds special education.

Local officials have long complained that the government never lived up to its promise to fund a large portion of special-education costs. In Janesville, federal and state aid doesn't cover the costs of the mandate to provide education for disabled students. The local cost in recent years has been about $9 million a year, business director Doug Bunton said.

The construction money could be put to good use, even though most Janesville school buildings have seen extensive renovations and expansions over the past 15 years.

Bunton said he would replace old boilers at Franklin Middle and Washington Elementary schools. Those projects otherwise would require borrowing money. The need is not immediate, but it would avoid loan costs.

Construction projects would put people to work, Evert noted, and could help the local economy as contractors hire or don't lay off people they need to do the work.

But Bunton said he wonders if the $1.36 million in construction money earmarked for Janesville might be restricted too much. What if replacing aging heating systems is not allowed?

Each school district has different construction needs, Bunton noted, so the more flexibility, the better.

Evert said the same concern about flexibility goes with the Title 1 and IDEA money. If it can be used for salaries and other operational costs, that would go a long way toward easing the local budget crunch.

The money is only for this year and 2010, however, while operational costs continue into the future.

"The theory is, you jump-start the economy by creating a flow of money and hopefully generate an increase in the tax base, get people to work," Evert said. "Improving the district means more people coming to Janesville. I certainly don't have the scope of everything this package is supposed to accomplish, but it would be a big help for two years."

Evert said he would be concerned if the money requires lots of additional reporting and paperwork, which takes up staff time.

"Time is money for us, too," Evert said.

But whatever happens, the schools will welcome the money.

"I'll wait at the front door," Bunton joked.

"Actually, we'll drive out to I-90 to wait," Evert added.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(8)
momof5
Jan 30, 2009 at 6:11 p.m.
Suggest removal

I wonder if TheJoker is B'moon!

danias
Jan 30, 2009 at 9:05 a.m.
Suggest removal

I don't know if anyone else notice this today actually I know a few did cause they also called the school dist. Who's big idea was it to close the marshall parking lot between marshall and monroe school and make it teachers parking lot only. Today marshall teachers and cops were telling people sorry can't be here first warning, well where are we suppose to drop are kids off at there is not enough room duh! If it's safety reasons than why don't they put out orange pole's around the crosswalk area so for the dumb parents that don't know your not suppose to park there.Than for the marshall parents that come speeding through the side street between the schools maybe should put up speed bumps to teach them a lesson.When is the next city meeting I would love to share these ideas???

TheJoker
Jan 30, 2009 at 9:02 a.m.
Suggest removal

Beenthere, thanks for the suggestion but I have already been there, done that. No joke either!

Goodboy
Jan 29, 2009 at 10:21 p.m.
Suggest removal

I believe Evert doesn't want ADDITIONAL paperwork. There's already a ton of paperwork involved in Title 1 and IDEA.

beenthere
Jan 29, 2009 at 5:28 p.m.
Suggest removal

With the vast amount of knowledge you 3 have on how the JSD operates and how ineffective and over staffed the administration is, I hope your names are on the School Board ballot. The entire school district would benefit so much.

biggirl
Jan 29, 2009 at 4:06 p.m.
Suggest removal

I agree with both of you with this caveat. The administration always wants to save money when it comes to teacher's salaries. I'm for saving real money by cutting back administration to 1970s levels. Money should be applied to instructional staff. More bang for the buck comes from a better teacher/student ratio, not from a bevvy of bureaucrats.

TheJoker
Jan 29, 2009 at 11:57 a.m.
Suggest removal

Rex, you are dead on with your comment. What do we pay this guy's salary for? Hmm...he wants all the money but does not want to do any of the heavy lifting. Trust me, they have enough administrators and staff to account and report back to the State how the money is being used and spent.

I just love how the school district is more concerned about spending money than saving money. Their belief is to just dump money into an issue rather than looking to be efficient and good stewards with taxpayer money.

Evert and the School Board should look internally first before he and others have their hands out to our leaders in Madision begging for money.

rexkramer
Jan 29, 2009 at 10:49 a.m.
Suggest removal

Evert said he would be concerned if the money requires lots of additional reporting and paperwork, which takes up staff time.

With a philosophy like that Mr. Evert should be in Madison or Washington. Yeah, I'd like the millions of dollars in taxpayer money, but I hope they don't expect us to actually account for how we spend it. After all, were the school district, we just want to spend, spend, spend without having to account for anything. Why do I have a feeling that while these guys are "hoping" for their handouts, the only thing "changing" will be the amount of money left in my wallet.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT