Pay freezes spread during recession

By JEANNINE AVERSA   Thursday, Jan. 22, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— What do Tropicana Casino and Resort, Avis and the White House now have in common?

They're all freezing the pay of some of their workers. It's part of a growing trend by employers facing the fallout — economic and political — from a brutal recession.

For companies, pay freezes are a key cost-cutting tool for surviving hard times.

For President Barack Obama, who ordered a pay freeze for White House employees earning over $100,000 a year, the move on his first full day in office sent a message to a nervous country: We're in this together.

"During this period of economic emergency," Obama said, "families are tightening their belts, and so should Washington."

The unemployment rate has bolted to a 16-year high of 7.2 percent. Last year, 2.6 million jobs vanished, the most since World War II. The jobless rate is expected to march upward and layoffs to pile up even with a multibillion-dollar stimulus package being crafted by Obama and Congress.

More squeezed employers, though, are seeking an alternative to layoffs. They're turning to pay freezes, pay reductions and other cost-cutting options, such as ending their contributions to 401(k) accounts.

"All of that hurts, but nothing hurts more than losing a job," said Allen Sinai, chief global economist at Decision Economics Inc. "It is a growing trend as companies try to cut costs. Going forward, we will see more of this, absolutely."

The Federal Reserve has taken notice. In a recent survey of economic conditions, it observed that in some parts of the country, companies were resorting to "pay freezes or reductions in compensation."

A wide range of employers have followed suit. In some cases, they're imposing pay freezes or cuts to avoid immediate layoffs, though economists say such steps tend to lead to layoffs anyway. In other cases, employers are cutting or freezing pay and laying off workers.

"It's a real tectonic shift," Terry Connelly, dean of Golden Gate University's Ageno School of Business, said of pay freezes and cuts. Such steps, which once affected mainly union workers, are spreading to white-collar industries, he said.

"The extraordinary pace of layoffs has shifted people's internal calculations to the point where they are not only willing to take a pay cut to save their own job but also take a freeze to save their co-worker's," Connelly said.

Tropicana Casino and Resort of Atlantic City, N.J., said Wednesday it's freezing pay for those making $50,000 and up and capping raises for lower-paid workers. But the company said more than 100 employees could still lose their jobs.

"We're working our way through a very difficult economic situation and attempting to avoid layoffs," said casino President Mark Giannantonio. "We're trying to do other things like reduced work weeks and altering schedules to keep people employed so that when the economy does improve, we'll still have them around."

Car company Avis Budget Group Inc. late last year announced a management salary freeze and cut more than 2,200 jobs to reduce costs.

Engine maker Cummins Inc. last week said it is freezing salaries and will cut 800 workers worldwide by the end of February. USA Today publisher Gannett Co. has imposed one-week unpaid furloughs for most of its U.S. employees, saying it wants to minimize the need for layoffs amid a severe advertising downturn. USA Today also declared a one-year freeze on wages.

"Employers are battening down the hatches," said John Challenger, president of Challenger, Gray & Christmas, a placement firm. "I think pay freezes are going to be widespread as companies struggle to hold on and wait out the recession."

And though he foresees more layoffs, too, Challenger said companies are aware that layoffs carry their own costs, financial and otherwise.

"You can lose company know-how," Challenger said. "Important relationships disappear that make cuts much more costly. You can't just get that back when you hire new people when times get better."

The Cleveland Clinic in Ohio imposed a hiring and salary freeze across its 33,000-worker health system in December. Aluminum producer Alcoa Inc., which this month said it was slashing 13,500 workers worldwide, has also imposed a salary and hiring freeze.

Luxury retailer Saks Inc. is axing 1,100 jobs, eliminating merit raises and suspending matching contributions to its 401(k) plan.

Caterpillar Inc., the world's biggest maker of mining and construction equipment, in late December said it was cutting executive compensation by up to 50 percent. It's also suspending merit pay increases for managers and support staff.

Earlier that month, FedEx Corp. said it was cutting pay for senior executives and freezing 401(k) contributions for a year. And AK Steel Holding Corp. is cutting pay for salaried employees.

At the White House, those affected by Obama's decision to freeze pay for the roughly 100 employees who make more than $100,000 include the chief of staff, the national security adviser and the press secretary.

Connelly called Obama's announcement "tone-setting leadership" and offered a new twist on an old saying: "Saving the buck starts here."

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(11)
ljs64
Jan 22, 2009 at 7:58 p.m.
Suggest removal

Ignorance is bliss in this blog. Wow..

Bubs
Jan 22, 2009 at 11:15 a.m.
Suggest removal

In order of post:
- Ryan giving to charity is not necessarily a good defense to a call for elected officials to refuse a pay raise. Some might argue that it is, I simply was pointing out that a charity is not the same thing as a treasury department.
- Kudos to Ryan for doing something. Do you know for a fact that none of the other legislators mentioned don't donate a comparable amount of money to charity. As Ryan makes more than three times as much as state legislators, it would presumably be somewhat easier to donate a substantial amount of money as others.
- Both sentences overgeneralize. Is charity always a better option. If these legislators were to donate to the ACLU or Freedom From Religion Foundation, would you consider that a good use of what is essentially your tax dollar? As for less waste, that may sometimes be the case but logically there are some charities that are less efficient than some government programs.
***
If Paul Ryan is indeed donating money to charity, good for him. I don't think, however, that we can hold it against state (or U.S.) legislators for not taking a pay raise.
I believe that Feingold also refuses pay raises during his term. He, however, sends his money back to the U.S. treasury. Personally, I prefer that tax payer money go back to the taxpayers.

BillyClydePuckett
Jan 22, 2009 at 10:08 a.m.
Suggest removal

"Voices called for elected officials to refuse pay raises. Presumably, that would amount to tax payer money staying in the treasury to be used by the public. That is not the same thing as donating to charity"

Charity is a much better option. Less waste.

spark
Jan 22, 2009 at 9:43 a.m.
Suggest removal

Bubs-The point is, at least Paul Ryan has done something. Would be nice for others to follow suit.

RetiredAirForce
Jan 22, 2009 at 9:39 a.m.
Suggest removal

"That is not the same thing as donating to charity."
-
Never said it was the same.

Bubs
Jan 22, 2009 at 9:31 a.m.
Suggest removal

Voices called for elected officials to refuse pay raises. Presumably, that would amount to tax payer money staying in the treasury to be used by the public. That is not the same thing as donating to charity.

RetiredAirForce
Jan 22, 2009 at 9:26 a.m.
Suggest removal

Paul Ryan has already committed donating his to charity.

futurerichguy
Jan 22, 2009 at 9:10 a.m.
Suggest removal

Not just elected officials, but all government employees should follow suit. This is an opportunity for Doyle to dig us out of this huge whole we're in.

Bubs
Jan 22, 2009 at 9:07 a.m.
Suggest removal

voices,
You accidentally forgot Paul Ryan. I'm sure it wouldn't hurt the treasury for him to give back some of his $169,300 per year salary.

voices
Jan 22, 2009 at 8:48 a.m.
Suggest removal

Perhaps our locally elected officials like Sen. Robson and Reps. Sheridan and Hixson should follow suit and not accept their pay raise.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT