School officials face ax

By FRANK SCHULTZ ( Contact )   Monday, Jan. 12, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Podcast Episode


School administrators may be on the table as the Janesville School Board considers budget cuts. Kyle Geissler reports.

RSS   

— Cut the administration!

That's a solution often proposed when budgets must be cut, and the Janesville School Board will consider cuts in administrative staff when it meets Tuesday night.

No vote is scheduled, but the board will review a series of reports and memos related to administrative staffing.

Officials have said for months that cutbacks in positions and/or services will be needed to balance the 2009-10 budget.

The district has some of the lowest administrative costs when compared with the 21 other largest school districts in the state, according to statistics collected by the Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance.

And it's not as though the administration hasn't been cut before. One memo states that 22.25 "administrative and support-staff positions" have been eliminated since 2003.

Nevertheless, the board faces a shrinking enrollment, a possible exodus of families in the wake of layoffs at the General Motors plant and state budget difficulties, all likely to affect the district's income.

A Dec. 31 memo to the board from Superintendent Tom Evert and Director of Administrative and Human Services Steve Salerno offers several courses of action:

-- A hiring freeze. The board would fill only those jobs considered critical. Considered critical would be teachers, principals, the superintendent, the four directors who report directly to the superintendent and secretaries to the superintendent, directors, principals and assistant principals.

Temporary workers would be hired through an employment agency and would be employees of that agency.

-- Attrition, which means not filling positions when people retire or resign. The difference from a hiring freeze is that once a hiring freeze is lifted, the positions could be refilled, but with attrition, the positions would be lost, Salerno said this morning.

"Attrition could impact the district's senior-level administrative team at a critical point, given the retirement announcement of our highly respected business services director, Doug Bunton," the memo states.

Bunton, like Evert, retires in June. Bunton earns $129,894 this year.

One option would be to shift Bunton's responsibilities to the new superintendent and/or to other directors, the memo states.

Or, the superintendent could take over supervision of the principals, something Salerno now does, and Salerno could take over some of the business department's responsibilities, the memo states.

Salerno, however, would need to go back to school to become certified in school business administration.

-- A furlough program, which would require certain employees to work fewer hours or to take unpaid time off. Or, some employees could be required to take "a week or two without pay sometime during the year."

-- Cutting positions. The memo does not reveal which positions might be cut but says the administration would propose the cuts in March.

No matter which course the board decides to pursue, the memo states the result is likely to be difficulties in retaining and recruiting staff "and/or overburdened staff, leading to increased medical leaves and Employee Assistance Plan support."

"These are suggestions. We are trying to give the board a menu of options to make this important decision," Salerno said.

A key piece of information is next year's enrollment. Officials are waiting for the results of a semiannual enrollment count that was taken on Friday, and Evert is considering surveying families to find out how many will have children in school next fall, Salerno said.

To examine these and other ideas, the memo proposes a 19-member task force comprising Evert and other administrators, teachers, parents, secretaries and community members.

The task force would work through March and report to the school board in April or May.

The board also will review an "efficiency audit" of central-office staff by Strategic HR Solutions of Verona.

The audit report recommends that the district cut its manager of transportation and purchasing position and absorb those duties elsewhere.

That's the only outright cut recommended in a report. The position is held by Steve Eichman, who earns $81,402 this year.

The report also suggests increased use of computer technology to save staff time, increased staffing for the information-technology department and a variety of reorganizations at the central office.

ON THE AGENDA

The Janesville School Board meets at 7 p.m. in the Educational Services Center, 527 S. Franklin St. The meeting will be telecast live on Janesville cable channels 96 and 993. Also, the board's buildings and ground/finance and personnel commitees both meet at 5:50 p.m. Tuesday.

Tuesday's agenda includes:

-- Discussion of the roles of the retiring Superintendent Tom Evert and the new superintendent, expected to be named this spring, in the hiring of administrators during the spring semester for jobs that would begin July 1. This concerns, at minimum, the hiring of a business director to replace Doug Bunton, who is retiring.

-- Discussion of a "leadership profile" of the next superintendent prepared by the superintendent-search consulting firm based on interviews of district and community members.

-- Discussion of the policy that controls when students are held back a grade.

-- A vote on a proposal to make up a snow day Friday, Jan. 23, and to make up the next snow day—if needed—Monday, April 13.

-- First reading of a revised policy on student fundraising. The change would allow sports teams to raise money for equipment, with the approval of the principal.

-- A vote on a change of status for Parker High School interim Principal Steve Schroeder, to principal, starting July 1.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(16)
kidsfirst
Jan 15, 2009 at 6:30 a.m.
Suggest removal

Here is a cost saving measure that would produce better results for everyone: Allow professional training to occur outside the control of downtown officials. Currently, many of our administrators spend time designing and teaching classes -- even to experienced teachers from other districts. They do not trust the quality of the training unless they deliver it. I would like to know how many staff hours are absorbed by their obsession. Twenty years ago, I completed 12 hours with district staff. Today's new teachers (including experienced ones) are required to complete 80 hours plus the annual 12 hours of professional development. One new teacher told me she would not have accepted the position in Janesville if she had been offered a job in any of several other districts -- they treat their teachers with more respect when it comes to training. Providing opportunities to develop skills is entirely different from saying "you have to complete our courses if you want to work in our district." How many other districts create this level of pressure for themselves? Are these district taught courses job security for some of our administrators?

billnewbie
Jan 12, 2009 at 4:28 p.m.
Suggest removal

The fact is that the district is shrinking which means that positions must be cut. Considering the economics of Janesville (the fact that the district must not raise taxes for the sake of its economically stressed residents, that the state is going to be cutting its share of education funds due to its own deficit and ambitious spending proposals (health care), and the soon to be jettisoned QEO which will force districts like ours to increase class sizes and decrease teacher employment) there really is no alternative.

jvltrnsplnt
Jan 12, 2009 at 3:53 p.m.
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
rep_of_1
Jan 12, 2009 at 1:54 p.m.
Suggest removal

The district just spent money on a outside source to come in and make every one feel special and now we are cutting back. How IRONIC. Spending foolishly=cuts.

red58
Jan 12, 2009 at 1:48 p.m.
Suggest removal

I find it hard to believe that there are 22.25 less FTEs in administration over the past less than 10 years. That would mean a whole lot of empty offices. Or does this mean that 22.25 position/jobs were eliminated, but some replaced with other administrative job responsibilities?

Hillman
Jan 12, 2009 at 1:38 p.m.
Suggest removal

I am not going to argue with a "ghost" but stand by my comment. The employee categories are public record and available to everyone.

brewersrock
Jan 12, 2009 at 1:26 p.m.
Suggest removal

Why kiss a secretary or two goodbye? Obviously you don't work in an office or you would know that the largest portion of the work is done by the administrative support folks--the managers get the credit for it, but the admin support are the ones that do the research & writing of reports...

Ealing
Jan 12, 2009 at 12:35 p.m.
Suggest removal

Mr. Wolfe that is why as Board President you had your head in the sand. I know this is true. That is a fact.

TheJoker
Jan 12, 2009 at 12:17 p.m.
Suggest removal

It is about time they start to look at staffing! If things continue with the economy and unemployment, they will need to look at closing some buildings.

Hillman
Jan 12, 2009 at 12:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

The distrcit does not eliminate employees when reporting their numbers. If it is not a classroom teacher then it is support of some sort. I know this but I am not sure how the previous poster knows they don't report administrative staff properly. That information is readily available if her or she requests it from the district. That is if they are interested in the facts. Facts make these postings rather boring.

JCK
Jan 12, 2009 at 12:04 p.m.
Suggest removal

Kiss a secretary or two goodbye.

Ealing
Jan 12, 2009 at 11:06 a.m.
Suggest removal

Count the number of staff who are on the Administrative Team that is the real number of administrators. The district eliminates some of them when reporting their administrative numbers. So are you on the team or not? If you are then you are an administrator. Otherwise it is creative accounting.

mydesk
Jan 12, 2009 at 10:59 a.m.
Suggest removal

I can give some names for termination. There are some administrators that need to be axed.

snarly
Jan 12, 2009 at 10:36 a.m.
Suggest removal

What no comment's yet Holy smoke it must be a slow day in janesville

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT