Diggin' in: Dredging of Lake Leota begins
Photo
Photo
EVANSVILLE It's been years in the making, so everyone wants to get a glimpse.
One city worker joked to foreman Mark Pearson that they should set up a tollbooth.
Curious onlookers are coming and going daily through Lake Leota Park to see the often-discussed and much-anticipated dredging of the lake.
One observer is Gib Wiedenhoeft, who as chairman of the Save Our Lake Environment group has advocated for the project since 1998.
"It's good to see dirt moving," he said, as snorting backhoes and rumbling trucks turned up and hauled away the lakebed.
Last fall, 70 percent of Evansville voters said the city should spend up to $2 million to restore the lake, which has been drained since 2005.
A crew from Integrity Grading and Excavating of Schofield is running trucks in and out of the lake 24 hours a day. The contractor started a few weeks ago, using mowers mounted on skid steers to remove brush and grass.
Integrity now has about 20 people working 12-hour shifts, Pearson said.
Workers have diverted Allen Creek from the middle of the lake to the eastern edge and this week hauled out the top layer of mud, he said.
But Mother Nature isn't playing along.
Winter snowstorms, 50-degree weather and rain didn't leave much frost in the ground. Contractors were hoping for a deeper frost to make the project easier, so Pearson said he's had to change plans.
Workers dug about 10,000 cubic yards of sandy, silty soil from the adjacent property where the dredged material is being dumped. They used the sandy soil to make a road in the lakebed. That's an additional cost to the contractor, but the city remains locked in at the bid price of $885,069, said Joe Dorava, project engineer with Vierbicher Associates.
The project was scheduled for winter to take advantage of the frozen ground and to avoid rainy spring and summer months, Pearson said.
This week, Pearson hopes to really dig in.
Working with four backhoes, five off-road trucks and three bulldozers, he'd like to see workers remove about 6,000 cubic yards of material per 12-hour shift. Plans call to remove total of 200,000 cubic yards of material, creating 8-, 10- and 15-foot-deep areas.
Backhoes sitting on wooden mats scoop with their buckets 35 to 40 feet in all directions. With each machine digging in an 80-foot diameter, "it goes pretty fast," Pearson said.
You won't find many elevation stakes in the lakebed. Technology dictates where the operators dig. The plans are entered into a global positioning system that shows how deep each area should be.
At a spot near the middle of the lake, for example, Pearson's GPS shows 6.5 feet should be dug out. With sensors on the equipment, workers can tell with each bucketful of dirt how much deeper to dig.
Off-road trucks haul the material out of the lake, dumping it onto 80 acres of adjacent farmland owned by the Every Trust. The dredged material will have to freeze before bulldozers can spread it evenly.
The city is paying the property owners.
Declan Every, whose family owns the land, said he's not optimistic the land will be ready for crops by spring. It will take awhile to work an estimated 17 inches of new soil into the rest of the topsoil, he said.
"The main issue is just trying to get it worked in so it's not just one layer sitting on top of another layer," he said.
Pearson hopes to be done in the lake by Feb. 15, though the contract deadline is April 1.
BY THE NUMBERS
24
Hours a day two crews are working
6,000
Cubic yards of material taken from lake per 12-hour shift
200,000
Cubic yards of material to be removed by completion
20
Cubic yards carried in an off-road truck per load
60
Loads each truck carries in a 12-hour shift
130,000
Pounds a loaded truck weighs
80
Acres on which the dredged material is being spread
$3,480
Cost of diesel fuel used by equipment every 12-hour shift
$1.37 million
Amount city borrowed for the project
$30
Cost of the project this year for a taxpayer with a $100,000 home
$885,069
Integrity's winning bid

Jan 11, 2009 at 9:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
Just think of the thousands of gallons of Bio-diesel fuel Integrity Grading could be buying/using that are made locally.......oh wait.......that factory in Evill was partially started and then scrapped. Never mind....
J.D.....I'm all for capitalism. Practice it every day. Are you in the armed forces?? Keyboard Kommando maybe???
Jan 11, 2009 at 8:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
curtaincall and metromilton... do either of you believe in a capitalistic America?
.
Guess not..by your' comments
Jan 11, 2009 at 6:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
You are funny.
Jan 11, 2009 at 5:45 p.m.
Suggest removal
I wonder how many "Green Credits" the city of Evansville will have to buy to make the emissions from 1,000's and 1,000's of gallons of diesel fuel burned go away. At least Evansville isn't a do as I say not as I do community. Everything there is Normal.
Jan 11, 2009 at 7:06 a.m.
Suggest removal
Metromilton, go read down the posts, the a couple of the contractors have already been listed in one of these posts. But you are right on. Like it was said, nothing funny every happens in Evansville or should we say contractor ville. NO as far as I know neither of these contractors bid on the lake,but they do both build houses.
Jan 10, 2009 at 10:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Declan Every, whose family owns the land, said he's not optimistic the land will be ready for crops by spring.".......OH NO!!!!!>>>>>The only "crop" Every is worried about is the new crop of houses slated to go on this very ground once the zoning and annexation are finalized.
Just who was this "prominent local contractor" mentioned in the blog anyways??? Did they bid the job and loose???
Jan 10, 2009 at 5:45 p.m.
Suggest removal
No it was suppose to be cheaper to put it on the farm land than haul. Thats why they looked at doing that. But it would have been a lot cheaper had the farmers not raped the city. I question as well if these farmers are actually in Evansville. Just being they would profit from the lake being done, without having to pay for it. IF anyone has actual questions you can get all this info at city hall , it is also on online at www.evansvilleobserver.blogspot.com He has audio and copies of some of the paper work for the meetings on line. He is a excellent source of information.
Jan 10, 2009 at 4:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
chellandlou you need to get a life, you don't even live here and don't need to worry about it. NO the city did not save money as they had to pay the 110.000 , with the original amount they were going to pay, what they had wanted to pay they would have saved money.. but not after they got taken.
Jan 10, 2009 at 4:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
Didn't the city save approx $600K because these farmers allowed the soil to be dumped on their land instead of having it hauled on road, off-site?
Jan 10, 2009 at 2:48 p.m.
Suggest removal
Why complain about something that is already been voted on and approved by the tax payers. Did you vote against this? I can't believe some of you don't have anything better to do. And if you aren't happy with the city of Evansville government, get your name on the next ballot. And here I thought Eagers and Roger Berg ran Evansville.
Jan 10, 2009 at 2:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
I don't blame the Everys one bit for holding out for the best price. The city needs a plan for the lake's future that doesn't involve a massive dredging project every generation or so. It was this lack of planning in the past that led to this situation.
.
As I've suggested in the past, the best idea is to create a lake district. Regardless of whether that is done, the lake needs to have some kind of endowment or capital budget to plan for periodic dredging or desilting. If not, this will just happen again in 2030 or so.
Jan 10, 2009 at 11:56 a.m.
Suggest removal
I think a strip mall, pizza hut, menards, old navy.. that might actually bring some business into town. What vision?? They have no vision, and no a empty bank account.
Jan 10, 2009 at 11:35 a.m.
Suggest removal
Just be glad some of these people have a vision for your town and lake, or it could have been left dieing and decaying like lake leota. So the farm family made money I only wish I owned that land.
Jan 10, 2009 at 10:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
ljs64, it maybe sarcasm today, but the truth tomorrow. That is how Evansville Gov. works. As long as decker and ringhand are bringing down this city they will pave the park in gold.
Jan 10, 2009 at 10:06 a.m.
Suggest removal
No- That was total sarcasm.........Got you though.
Jan 10, 2009 at 10:04 a.m.
Suggest removal
lsj- Are you serious? laying brick?? in the park??
Jan 10, 2009 at 9:58 a.m.
Suggest removal
curtaincall - how do you know that the farmers were not interested in the lake being done? do you have firsthand knowledge or something?
Jan 10, 2009 at 9:49 a.m.
Suggest removal
Do you blame them for wanting the most money they could get? 70% of the voters said they wanted the Lake restored to its original state. Farmers all around Evansville have been selling their land to developers to then be sub-divided into 1/2 to 1 acre lots at a much larger profit. Are you going to blame the developers for that? Come on people the deal is done. The lake is underway, Let's move on to more important issues in town, like brick paving all the streets in Lake Leota Park.
Jan 10, 2009 at 9:45 a.m.
Suggest removal
I am also disappointed that residents in union did not get to vote on this and/or help pay for it on their tax bills. I compare it to residents of the city of Evansville having to help pay for the new fire house, as we will use it, yet it union. Yet people in union will use the lake/park yet not pay a dime.
Jan 10, 2009 at 9:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
neg?? more like robbery at tax payer expense. It for me is not about how much was paid as it is about how it all came about. It is well known in town that a certain very well known contractor went to these family's and told them what they should be asking, and after his visit with them the asking price, the negotiating price went up, way up. They were not interested in the lake being done, they wanted the money.
Jan 10, 2009 at 9:27 a.m.
Suggest removal
rlms you are funny. I do understand in
what form you are asking that.
Jan 10, 2009 at 9:25 a.m.
Suggest removal
Wow pat have you never heard of negotiating? When I purchased my home in Evansville, the seller had it listed for XXX. I offered them XXX. They countered with XXX. And we finally settled on XXX. That is the way things are done in this country. Ever bought a car? WE NEGOTIATE. Once there is an agreement between the buyer and seller the deal is done and NO ONE TOOK ANYONE TO THE CLEANERS. I could care less what the original offer was, because the final AGREED upon price was $110,000. End of story.
Jan 10, 2009 at 9:10 a.m.
Suggest removal
Why would anyone be nervous? Its all public record. Besides, our city leaders would not participate in any funny business would they???
Jan 10, 2009 at 9:05 a.m.
Suggest removal
the deal maybe done, but that is not what was originally offered, what they had budgeted for. Its all in the paperwork. All one has to do is follow it and read it and you can see for yourself.
Jan 10, 2009 at 9:02 a.m.
Suggest removal
Again.... The Every's made the offer to use their land for a specific price, $110,000. The City of Evansville ACCEPTED that offer. No one "took the city for a ride." This is the basics in negotiating 101. Get over it. The deal is done!
Jan 10, 2009 at 8:38 a.m.
Suggest removal
Nope. The dirt was tested before the farmers would agree to have the soil placed on their land. It is excellent soil in terms of being rich in nutrients. Excellent crop soil.
Jan 10, 2009 at 8:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
Hmmmm.... I am curious if there is any contamination in that dredged soil.. all the runoff, possible heavy metals (lead, cadmium) from Baker...
Depending on what is in that dirt, the farmers may have gotten more than they paid for.
Jan 10, 2009 at 8:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
It will be nice to see the lake again. However the city got raped with what they had to pay the landowners. I have heard it as well for months that the city offered them one figure and the land owners demanded a lot more than what city had planned on. They got their xxxx handed to them. I
Jan 10, 2009 at 8:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
110,000 a huge amount of money. The problem with this number is it did not start out at the amount. The city had a ball park idea of what they would be spending from the beginning. Then a certain contractor talked with some of these land owners and all of sudden the amount they wanted went way up!!!! Yes they did take the city for a ride.
Jan 10, 2009 at 7:34 a.m.
Suggest removal
$110,000 was paid to the Every's to dump the dredged material on their land.
Jan 10, 2009 at 7:17 a.m.
Suggest removal
I can't wait to see the lake after it's done. My parents, grandparents, aunts and uncles all swam and fished in that lake.
I'm proud of the voters who voted YES in restoration.
Jan 10, 2009 at 7:06 a.m.
Suggest removal
Get over it pat. They made the offer and the city accepted it. Those folks took no one for a ride.
Jan 10, 2009 at 6:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
For what the city paid those land owners, which was a ton. They don't need to complain about not being able to get a crop in this spring. They were compensated very well, to well. Took the city for a ride.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.