State officials are divided on taking raises

By GAZETTE STAFF   Friday, Jan. 2, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

It's only a few hundred thousand dollars out of a $5.4 billion shortfall.

But a 5.3 percent increase for state legislators could be a hard thing for struggling Wisconsinites to watch.

Legislators representing Rock and Walworth counties have mixed responses—if they have even decided—regarding what they will do with the pay raises scheduled for the 2009-2010 session.

Each legislator is scheduled to earn $49,943 in the 2009-10 session.

The Legislature didn't vote on it.

According to state law, changes to the compensation plan for elected officials are submitted by the director of the Office of State Employment Relations to an eight-person joint committee on employment relations.

The committee votes on the entire compensation plan, said Laura Jones with the Office of the Assembly Chief Clerk.

The state constitution prohibits salaries from being changed mid-term, according to a brief from the Legislative Reference Bureau.

In addition to salary and benefits, Legislators get a per diem rate for meals and lodging for weekday work in Madison, according to the bureau. A committee for each house sets the maximum per diem for its members.

"Despite subsequent adjustments in the federal travel allowance, the rates set by the committees have remained the same since 2001," the brief states.

The per diem is $88 for legislators living outside of Dane County and $44 for those living in Dane.

The Janesville Gazette asked local legislators if they intend to accept the raise.

Rep. Chuck Benedict, D-Beloit—Benedict tentatively plans to give to charity the $2,500 dollars per year included in the scheduled pay increase.

"The quick answer is we can't give the money back," Benedict said.

Benedict said he hasn't decided where he will donate the money but will make that decision in early 2009.

Rep. Brett Davis, R-Oregon—Davis won't accept a pay raise in the upcoming session.

"Due to the weak economy, many families and businesses are facing tough times and are not seeing pay increases this year," Davis said in a statement. "I do not think it is fair that elected officials get a raise when many folks are facing slimmer family budgets."

Davis said he would donate his pay increase of $2,530 per year to local charities.

"I believe the dollars will be better spent locally rather than by state government," he said. "We have a lot of great causes in southern Wisconsin, and I plan to donate the money to local charities on a rotating basis throughout the upcoming biennium."

Sen. Jon Erpenbach, D-Middleton—Sen. Jon Erpenbach said last week he would not accept the midterm pay increase. The Middleton Democrat said he would send the money back to the Senate chief clerk.

Since his election in 1998, he has never accepted a mid-term pay raise, he said.

Rep. Kim Hixson, D-Whitewater—Hixson said he'll accept the raise.

Hixson took a leave of absence from his position at UW-Whitewater to serve in the Legislature, he said.

"I've already asked my family to sacrifice for me being in the Legislature because I took a cut in pay," he said. "I was a state employee, and as such I'm not allowed to do my other job. I don't think it's fair to ask my family to do without."

Sen. Neal Kedzie, R-Elkhorn—The Gazette could not reach Kedzie for comment.

Rep. Thomas Lothian, R-Williams Bay—Lothian said he's gotten a few phone calls from constituents about the 5.3 percent pay raise he's set to receive next session.

"These are raises that we (legislators) had nothing to do with," he said.

Lothian said when he took office in 2002, he tried to turn down the pay raise that was scheduled then.

"I found out at that time that I couldn't not take the money," he said. "I had to take the money."

Lothian said he requested that pay raise be put in the state's rainy day fund.

"This time, I don't know," he said.

Lothian said he plans to have his staff look into what options are available.

Rep. Stephen Nass, R-Whitewater—Rep. Nass will accept the pay increase, he said.

"One thing that many, many are forgetting is that legislators did take a pay freeze for four years not that long ago," Nass said.

Sen. Judy Robson, D-Beloit—The Janesville Gazette could not reach Robson for comment.

Rep. Mike Sheridan, D-Janesville—Sheridan, Assembly speaker-elect will accept the pay increase, he wrote in a news statement.

"I plan to accept the pay increase and work hard for every dime," Sheridan wrote.

He thinks the decision is a personal one for legislators.

The Assembly will keep looking for ways to streamline the operating costs of the legislative process, Sheridan wrote.

He cited the fact that per diem allowances have been frozen since the 2001 budget cycle and will remain frozen in the 2009-10 cycle.

Legislators' salaries have increased 1.9 percent annually for 10 years, keeping their wages below the base pay of other full-time legislators, Sheridan wrote.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(14)
voices
Jan 16, 2009 at 10:55 a.m.
Suggest removal

Hixson made it known on the campaign trail that his wife lost her job or something to that effect. Why am I not surprised he's now decided to keep this raise. Nobody made him leave his cushy job at UW-Whitewater. What a joke.

Hockeyjockey
Jan 6, 2009 at 7:52 p.m.
Suggest removal

Kudos, Gazette, on your scathing editorial tonight about the legislators who accepted the raise. It was dead on perfect!!
For Hixson, Nass, Sheridan, etc. to accept the raise just shows how out of touch they are with reality in this state. And how badly they all need public relations lessons.

chelleandlou
Jan 3, 2009 at 1:01 p.m.
Suggest removal

And a note to Kim Hixson...it was YOUR choice to leave your job and run for office. It was YOUR choice to take the pay cut. So to say YOUR family shouldn't do without over those who have no job, benefits, etc. is absolutely greedy and repulsive. As far as I'm concerned, you're already overpaid.

chelleandlou
Jan 3, 2009 at 12:58 p.m.
Suggest removal

I will not vote for anyone who accepts the raise. They don't deserve it in the first place and secondly there are too many unemployed who could use that money in the form of housing, medical, and food.

spacejam
Jan 2, 2009 at 8:08 p.m.
Suggest removal

ops so sorry, "comment" for all the spell checkers lol

spacejam
Jan 2, 2009 at 8:05 p.m.
Suggest removal

Happy2BAlive: You are forever right on your coment !!!

JohnDoe
Jan 2, 2009 at 8 p.m.
Suggest removal

Let's see how much the football coach continues to bring in after this boneheaded season.
.
And before anyone slams this statement...please explain to me why he deserved a multi-thousand dollar raise/bonus before even proving his coaching abilities.
.
This is the first year he actually coached without being in Barry's recruiting shadow, and we see how that turned out.

redtop49
Jan 2, 2009 at 2:44 p.m.
Suggest removal

The football coach brings in many times that in revenue, any idiot should know that. The job these jokers are doing is a part time job 30 days for some states, if they would do the job pass a budget and go home they wouldn't need that much time or money.

Happy2BAlive
Jan 2, 2009 at 11:28 a.m.
Suggest removal

What I really want to be when I grow up is the UW-Madison's head football coach. He made $1.3 million in 2007 (http://www.winonadailynews.com/articles/...) and nobody's upset about that! The University is paid for by taxpayer dollars isn't it? And we're screaming about $2,500. I guess you have to pick your battles...

Happy2BAlive
Jan 2, 2009 at 11:12 a.m.
Suggest removal

This thing we have to realize is the sweet deal most of these legislators have - especially in Rock county. Most of our legislators work very hard and do earn every penny of it. But go to www.legis.state.wi.us/ and pull up their "Session Schedule"; there you'll see that WI Legislators are NOT full-time and when you package it up it becomes apparant that it is NOT the raise they need to open up for discussion...it is that we do NOT need a full-time legislature and they SHOULD include this discussion in THIS session. And all honesty should explore changing the per diem rule to a distance stipulation...not a county stipulation. If you live within 60 miles, your daily per diem should be $44 - not $88. They should all get in agreement ASAP and start working towards big issues - transportation, healthcare, education, tougher drunk driving laws, JOBS...

whoanellie
Jan 2, 2009 at 11:09 a.m.
Suggest removal

Take a lesson from Paul Ryan! These guys are so out of touch with the WI people!! And they are right here inour state!

woodsman
Jan 2, 2009 at 11:05 a.m.
Suggest removal

SNERIDAN you better keep your raise: You exspecaily are GREEDY. We all know you get a FULL RETIREMENT from G.M. You are a work of art!!!

huh
Jan 2, 2009 at 10:19 a.m.
Suggest removal

While I believe the 5.3% raise is excessive, I don't think it is realistic to ask anyone to not take a pay raise. What would be interesting to know, though, is what the package increase (with benefits) is.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT