Economy moving in reverse faster than predicted
WASHINGTON The economy is moving in reverse faster than the government can measure.
The contraction for the fourth quarter of 2008 had been estimated at 3.8 percent just a month ago. Then the Commerce Department raised it to an astonishing 6.2 percent Friday — the largest revision since the government started keeping records in 1976.
That was the economy's worst showing in a quarter-century and raised the prospect that the nation could suffer its worst year since 1946.
"Consumers are just hunkering down and saying 'game over,' and businesses in response are cutting back on investment and employment," said Brian Bethune, economist at IHS Global Insight. "It's a negative feedback loop."
Now in its second year, the recession is expected to stretch at least through the first six months of 2009, as shoppers slash spending in the shadow of hard times at home and aboard.
Companies, in turn, are being forced to cut jobs and production while resorting to other cost-saving measures to survive.
The Commerce Department's new report was also weaker than the 5.4 percent drop economists had expected.
The biggest culprit behind the record-breaking revision: Businesses actually cut inventories instead of building them as the government originally thought. That reduced — rather than added to — economic activity.
In addition, consumers pulled back even more on their spending — which accounts for about 70 percent of national economic activity. U.S. exports suffered a bigger drop and businesses retrenched further.
Many economists lowered their forecast for this year's gross domestic product to show a deeper contraction of at least 2 percent. GDP, the value of all goods and services produced in the United States, is the best barometer of the country's economic health.
White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said the latest GDP figure "underscores the urgency with which the president feels we have to move to improve our economy."
The economy has not suffered a decline for a full year since 1991, and that was just by 0.2 percent.
If the new projections prove accurate, it would mark the worst annual showing since an 11 percent plunge in 1946.
"The slide in our economy is very severe and very broad across all industries and regions of the country," said Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com. "It is about as dark an economic time that we've experienced since the 1930s."
Before Friday's report was released, many economists were projecting an annualized drop of 5 percent in the current January-March quarter.
Given the fourth quarter's showing and the dismal state of the jobs market, some economists believe a decline of closer to 6 percent in the current quarter is possible.
The nation's jobless rate is now at 7.6 percent, the highest in more than 16 years. The Federal Reserve expects the rate to climb to close to 9 percent this year, and probably will stay elevated into 2011.
California's unemployment rate jumped to 10.1 percent in January, the state's first double-digit jobless reading in a quarter-century. The jobless rate announced Friday by the state Employment Development Department is well above the national jobless rate, and represents an increase from the revised figure of 8.7 percent in December.
On Wall Street, stocks fell Friday as investors reacted to a decision by Citigroup Inc. to turn over a big piece of itself to the government and a move by General Electric Co. to slash its quarterly dividend by 68 percent. Investors also paid close attention to the lower GDP figures.
The Dow Jones industrials fell more than 119 points to 7,062.93, its lowest close since May 1, 1997.
The faster downhill slide in the final quarter of 2008 came as the financial crisis — the worst since the 1930s — intensified. Both the new and the old fourth-quarter figures marked the weakest quarterly showing since an annualized drop of 6.4 percent in the first quarter of 1982, when the country was suffering through an intense recession.
For all of 2008, the economy grew just 1.1 percent, weaker than the government initially estimated. That was down from a 2 percent gain in 2007 and marked the slowest growth since the last recession in 2001.
In the fourth quarter, consumers cut spending at a 4.3 percent pace. That was deeper than the initial 3.5 percent annualized drop and marked the biggest decline since the second quarter of 1980.
Businesses slashed spending on equipment and software at an annualized pace of 28.8 percent in the final quarter of last year. That was deeper than first reported and the worst showing since the first quarter of 1958.
Fallout from the housing collapse spread to other areas. Builders cut spending on commercial construction projects 21.1 percent, the most since the first quarter of 1975. Home builders slashed spending at a 22.2 percent pace, the most since the start of 2008.
In the long run, the reduction in new projects should aid the housing market's recovery as fewer properties for sale help increase competition and stabilize prices. But at the moment, a stable housing market appears months away.
A sharper drop in U.S. exports also factored into the weaker fourth-quarter performance. Economic troubles overseas are sapping demand for domestic goods and services.

Mar 2, 2009 at 12:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
Another new 52 week low for the Market today...great job.
Feb 28, 2009 at 10:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
I don`t say it, the experts do. The Dems did pass some reregulation of the mortgage industry when they got in, in the House, but the Senate could never get enough votes to bring it up. As you saw with the proposed auto loans, it takes 60 votes to move legislation in the Senate.
Feb 28, 2009 at 9:24 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Right, blame it on the new guy. Not the credit crisis, not the housing bubble, not the lax regulation, not the misguided Paulson bailout approach, but the guy who's been in office a month."
-
I love how he is the new guy. He has been part of the problem since 2005.
Feb 28, 2009 at 9:23 p.m.
Suggest removal
"The Democratic Congress that has only been in power(not even enough to pass spending and taxing legislation without Republican votes!) since January of 2007 is the cause of the recession?"
-
Are we talking about the same recession you say started in 2007?
Feb 28, 2009 at 7:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
The Democratic Congress that has only been in power(not even enough to pass spending and taxing legislation without Republican votes!) since January of 2007 is the cause of the recession? What planet have you been living on?
Feb 28, 2009 at 7:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
localboy, the economy was slowing before the Dems took control of congress. You have a short memory. I think I'll give my President, Republican or Democrat, more than a month to "save the world".
Feb 28, 2009 at 6:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
localboysince1968,
Congress should bear most of the blame, but the President has to bear some of it as well since he has to sign the bills. President Bush signed the first disastrous stimulus bill and President Obama signed the second disastrous bill.
Feb 28, 2009 at 6:22 p.m.
Suggest removal
Dr. Talk, thanks. Until we can all get past this party against party smokescreen, we won't take back our servant, the federal government.
Feb 28, 2009 at 6:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
mooshoo, I'm kind of in the same boat, only reverse order... my grandparents (rest their souls) lived during the Great Depression.... now I (much like many others) find myself doing the same thing for my little one.... things are difficult, and at the sounds of it, are only going to get worse before any chance of improvement....
Feb 28, 2009 at 5:47 p.m.
Suggest removal
The democratic lead congress is to blame for our financial mess. Not the President (Bush or Obama). However, you are the ones who drank the kool aid and thought he was going to save the world.
Feb 28, 2009 at 5:22 p.m.
Suggest removal
The baby boomers are playing a huge part in this mess. They have been slowing down on spending, looking to retirement. "We keep you alive to serve this ship, row well and live".
Feb 28, 2009 at 2:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Rooster: Guess what? Every time you (or I) open our mouths the stock market goes down too. No one person can be blamed for the situation. My answer? I'm getting tired of treading water. Somebody wake me when it's over.
Feb 28, 2009 at 2:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
Blame goes to both parties. They both have faulty logic.
1. We're trillions of dollars in debt, we must do something.
2. Let's borrow a couple more trillion, that's doing something.
C. Let's do it!
That reminds me of what GM did in the late 80s/early 90s (I think that's when it was). GM was losing $100 for every car they sold. So the head of GM thought the solution was to sell more cars. Apparently he wasn't a math major.
Feb 28, 2009 at 2:13 p.m.
Suggest removal
That's right, stock market goes down. Oh well, I guess BIG MONEY is going to feel the hurt now also.
Feb 28, 2009 at 2:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
every time obama opens his mouth, the stock market goes down. i suppose that is the republicans fault too.
Feb 28, 2009 at 12:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
Thanks to our politicians and the greed of BIG MONEY that screwed up our economy. And yes, we will suffer some to put ORDER back into our country. And I really hope that President Obama is the man to do it.
Feb 28, 2009 at 12:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
to be honest, a lot of D.C. congressmen from both the Dem and Rep parties were concerned of Obama's inexperience during his race for office... he wasn't then to handle this crisis... he was more focused on equal rights for mothers and the ethnically diverse...
.
I agree with Mcdaddy on this one... businesses are only doing what they have to do... the only thing I view differently is because the value of our nation's currancy has dropped as much as it has, why are buisnesses not reducing their prices so that people are able to afford even the necessities: food, clothes, a roof over their/their families heads... you don't have to be a home owner to have to worry about losing your home.... there many people out there are worried about being evicted because of lack of work and doing everything they can to make sure that themselves/their families are provided for...
Feb 28, 2009 at 11:54 a.m.
Suggest removal
Right, blame it on the new guy. Not the credit crisis, not the housing bubble, not the lax regulation, not the misguided Paulson bailout approach, but the guy who's been in office a month. We can't possibly blame this on anything that happened earlier.
.
You guys are so, so silly. Maybe that's why you lost the election.
Feb 28, 2009 at 9:43 a.m.
Suggest removal
the economy is where it is because of the election. I talked to many business leaders who were optimistic about Obama, but said they were ready to make drastic changes to survive. Everyone is worried what the new administration will do, and we will have to wait and see if they can turn this thing (economy) around, and how quickly that can happen.
.
This will be the single biggest thing that will determine if Obama is re-elected in 4 years or not. Wait and see.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.