LaHood eyes taxing miles driven
Photo 
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood is interviewed by The Associated Press, Thursday, Feb. 19, 2009, in Washington.
WASHINGTON Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood says he wants to consider taxing motorists based on how many miles they drive rather than how much gasoline they burn — an idea that has angered drivers in some states where it has been proposed.
Gasoline taxes that for nearly half a century have paid for the federal share of highway and bridge construction can no longer be counted on to raise enough money to keep the nation's transportation system moving, LaHood said in an interview with The Associated Press.
"We should look at the vehicular miles program where people are actually clocked on the number of miles that they traveled," the former Illinois Republican lawmaker said.
Most transportation experts see a vehicle miles traveled tax as a long-term solution, but Congress is being urged to move in that direction now by funding pilot projects.
The idea also is gaining ground in several states. Governors in Idaho and Rhode Island are talking about such programs, and a North Carolina panel suggested in December the state start charging motorists a quarter-cent for every mile as a substitute for the gas tax.
A tentative plan in Massachusetts to use GPS chips in vehicles to charge motorists by the mile has drawn complaints from drivers who say it's an Orwellian intrusion by government into the lives of citizens. Other motorists say it eliminates an incentive to drive more fuel-efficient cars since gas guzzlers will be taxed at the same rate as fuel sippers.
Besides a VMT tax, more tolls for highways and bridges and more government partnerships with business to finance transportation projects are other funding options, LaHood, one of two Republicans in President Barack Obama's Cabinet, said in the interview Thursday.
"What I see this administration doing is this — thinking outside the box on how we fund our infrastructure in America," he said.
LaHood said he firmly opposes raising the federal gasoline tax in the current recession.
The program that funds the federal share of highway projects is part of a surface transportation law that expires Sept. 30. Last fall, Congress made an emergency infusion of $8 billion to make up for a shortfall between gas tax revenues and the amount of money promised to states for their projects. The gap between money raised by the gas tax and the cost of maintaining the nation's highway system and expanding it to accommodate population growth is forecast to continue to widen.
Among the reasons for the gap is a switch to more fuel-efficient cars and a decrease in driving that many transportation experts believe is related to the economic downturn. Electric cars and alternative-fuel vehicles that don't use gasoline are expected to start penetrating the market in greater numbers.
"One of the things I think everyone agrees with around reauthorization of the highway bill is that the highway trust fund is an antiquated system for funding our highways," LaHood said. "It did work to build the interstate system and it was very effective, there's no question about that. But the big question now is, We're into the 21st century and how are we going to take care of our infrastructure needs ... with a highway trust fund that had to be plused up by $8 billion by Congress last year?"
A blue-ribbon national transportation commission is expected to release a report next week recommending a VMT.
The system would require all cars and trucks be equipped with global satellite positioning technology, a transponder, a clock and other equipment to record how many miles a vehicle was driven, whether it was driven on highways or secondary roads, and even whether it was driven during peak traffic periods or off-peak hours.
The device would tally how much tax motorists owed depending upon their road use. Motorists would pay the amount owed when it was downloaded, probably at gas stations at first, but an alternative eventually would be needed.
Rob Atkinson, president of the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission, the agency that is developing future transportation funding options, said moving to a national VMT would take about a decade.
Privacy concerns are based more on perception than any actual risk, Atkinson said. The satellite information would be beamed one way to the car and driving information would be contained within the device on the car, with the amount of the tax due the only information that's downloaded, he said.
The devices also could be programmed to charge higher rates to vehicles that are heavier, like trucks that put more stress on roadways, Atkinson said.

Feb 21, 2009 at 2:08 a.m.
Suggest removal
Guess what, mr.rexkramer: Obama has dumped the idea put forth by the GOP stalk of celery.
Feb 21, 2009 at 12:58 a.m.
Suggest removal
Was this proposal dreamed up by the Road fixing industry or the automobile dealer industry? Will it then be a felony when these devices break or you try and fill up during a cloudy day when the satellite can't pick up your signal?
I may be mistaken, but wasn't it all that long ago that experts were talking about overburdened GPS satellites? What about hackers?
Feb 21, 2009 at 12:05 a.m.
Suggest removal
"Idea is being brought forth by a Republican."
First, I could care less if the idea was being brought forth by a stalk of celery, a new tax is a new tax. Second, if The One chose him for his cabinet then he's about as much of a true Republican as I am a starting quarterback for the Packers. Bottom line is any politician reaching in my pocket for more of my money, particularly in this economic climate, deserves to be scorned, no matter what side of the Congressional aisle he sits in.
Feb 20, 2009 at 9:23 p.m.
Suggest removal
Anyone ready for the Boston Tea Party???
Feb 20, 2009 at 5:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
Obama, our savior. I hope he does good, but just remember one thing, HE IS STILL A POLITICIAN, and they lie all the time for personal/political gain, please remember that! Obama said (just yesterday) "NAFTA will have to be on hold". Oh well, just another campaign promise broken. He promised all the Union workers different.
Feb 20, 2009 at 5:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
It`s a money loser, and I heard Obama already put the kibosh on it.
Feb 20, 2009 at 4:37 p.m.
Suggest removal
To all that with the mind set only the rich will end up having a tax burden with mileage and gas tax are sorely mistaken. I don't have a choice to show up with half my tools needed for a job. It takes what it takes to get work done. Lets not be so selfish in our mindsets and see the whole picture.
Feb 20, 2009 at 4:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
RAISE THE GAS TAX. I intentionally purchased a vehicle that gets great gas mileage for a number of reasons. Paying less in taxes than someone choosing to drive a gas guzzler would just add another reason to my list. Everyone has a choice. If you choose to buy things that use more of our resources or you're too lazy to use measures that help save our resources then you should pay more. It's that simple!
Feb 20, 2009 at 2:49 p.m.
Suggest removal
foolonthehill, I guess it does appear that way. And with some of the responses given here sometimes it feels that way anyway.
Yes, if someone is in severe violation of the rules they are removed from the site and all previous posts are deleted.
Feb 20, 2009 at 2:48 p.m.
Suggest removal
Idea is being brought forth by a Republican.
Feb 20, 2009 at 2:32 p.m.
Suggest removal
gazettefan, your posts were entirely relevant in the context of the posts that preceded them. My point was, if someone were to read all of the posts in order for the very first time, it would sound as though you are talking to an imaginary friend and are, therefore, quite delusional.
As for being dumped from the site, I have only seen the content of a post deleted (this comment removed by site staff) but never all traces of its existence. Perhaps, I am mistaken.
Now, back to zis imaginary friend of yours... Veeeeery interesting.
Feb 20, 2009 at 2:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
foolonthehill, not sure of your meaning.
It looks like she's been entirely dumped from the site. My posts on this story may not have been entirely on point, but they were relevant enough. She resorted to name calling. And my posts only accurately pointed out a strain of violence in her citations and comments -without name calling.
And ultimately, I think, you and I missed the post that actually got her dumped. Staff tends to be tolerant so she really must have gone over the line.
She may still be able to see this site and leave posts but only she, and no one else, can see her posts. If she can see this post, I prefer that she was still with us. But I've noticed when attempting to debate with scripturists and people fundamentally into religion, that they tap-out easily and unacceptable instincts are aggravated.
Feb 20, 2009 at 2:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
Just keep voting for the democrats who have never seen a tax they did not like. Or can figure out a way to tax it. Hang on everyone this is only the beginning of things to come.
Feb 20, 2009 at 1:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Notice how in aletheia's 11:43 post the flimsy pretense of intellect gives way so easily to the violent theme of monotheism. This mirrors perfectly the violence intrinsic to scripture including the koran."
Actually, gfan, every aletheia post has vanished! I didn't realize that was possible. What a great way to make other folks appear to be delusional.
Feb 20, 2009 at 1:02 p.m.
Suggest removal
Average driver goes 12,000 miles a year. At a quarter cent a mile, that is $30. If you have a car that gets 50 mpg , that is $77 for Wisconsin gas taxes, much more for lower mpg cars. How is this going to substitute for the tax?
Feb 20, 2009 at 12:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
rexkramer, re: cigarette tax, even if the plan is to reduce smoking, and I suspect it is, then it's a good plan. If revenue has to come from other places, then we've all still benefited.
Then it's really a matter of making sure people are taxed fairly and tax revenue is used properly.
Feb 20, 2009 at 12:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
"What I see this administration doing is this — thinking outside the box on how we fund our infrastructure in America," he said.
Allow me to translate: "This administration is going to find every way possible to screw the people of this country by reaching into their pockets to pay for the endless giveaways this administration plans on handing out for the next four years"
If this quote doesn't perfectly summarize the liberal agenda I don't know what does. Remember Obama in '12! Of course, by that time I'll probably be taxed so badly I won't be able to afford to pay for the mileage I'll incur to drive to the polls.
Feb 20, 2009 at 12:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Among the reasons for the gap is a switch to more fuel-efficient cars and a decrease in driving that many transportation experts believe is related to the economic downturn. Electric cars and alternative-fuel vehicles that don't use gasoline are expected to start penetrating the market in greater numbers."
Once again we see that when people actually listen to the tree hugger crowd and drive eco friendly, fuel efficient vehicles, what happens, the government says thank you by sticking it to the taxpayer. Isn't this the same philosophy as Alliant "sharing the burden" with Wisconsin consumers because they aren't selling as much gas/electric since GM is gone?
Oh, by the way, all you folks out there that love the idea of jacking up the cigarette taxes, take notice because it'll be the same thing when smoking drastically declines, they'll just look for something else to tax to make up for the revenue. That's why every time I hear someone say "well it's only a few cents/dollars" when it comes to any additional tax I want to scratch my eyes out. Wake up, you let these money grubbing politicians in the door with a 5 cent tax today and tomorrow they're reaching in you're pocket for a dollar.
Feb 20, 2009 at 12:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
The government has unfairly not separated itself from the church by allowing it monetary benefits that others don't have.
Feb 20, 2009 at 12:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
The story says a "substitute" for the gas tax. I don`t really see how it would work anyway, it`s going to bring in much less money.
Feb 20, 2009 at 12:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
alethiea, an unfair tax system is the topic. Consistent with this is that the church benefits from this unfair system. You not only made it religious, you displayed perfectly the dangerous volatility of your kind of religious conviction.
Feb 20, 2009 at 12:22 p.m.
Suggest removal
SEPARATION BETWEEN CHURCH AND STATE PEOPLE,,I say CHURCH AND STATE>>>>
Feb 20, 2009 at 12:20 p.m.
Suggest removal
fatcheck,This would not be a deal because they would still keep the gas tax and probaly raise it with some other lame excuse.
Feb 20, 2009 at 12:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
Federal gas tax, 18.4 cents. Wisconsin, 32.1 cents. Cars that get less than 30mpg pay a little more, those that get more pay a little less.
Feb 20, 2009 at 12:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
At a quarter cent a mile, that is 7.5 cents a gallon for a car getting thirty miles to the gallon. What is the gas tax? Seems to me it is higher than that, much higher. This could be a deal.
Feb 20, 2009 at 12:01 p.m.
Suggest removal
Notice how in aletheia's 11:43 post the flimsy pretense of intellect gives way so easily to the violent theme of monotheism. This mirrors perfectly the violence intrinsic to scripture including the koran.
Feb 20, 2009 at 11:52 a.m.
Suggest removal
LaHood, wasn't that the name of the rich sob in Pale Rider?
Feb 20, 2009 at 11:45 a.m.
Suggest removal
"ATTENTION ALL INVESTORS" Do to Doyle's increased demand on KY products it is suspected that KY stock will reap large returns on the dollar. Taxpayers of wisconsin will be bent over to be stimulated by (yes yours truly Gov,Doyle)Make your purchases now,for this could be the "BIG" payoff. LOL!!
Feb 20, 2009 at 11:37 a.m.
Suggest removal
By the way, I'm not a communist. Communism has its roots in early christianity: unrealistically, idealized communal life headed by an all-powerful, unelected leader.
Feb 20, 2009 at 11:34 a.m.
Suggest removal
Everyone has to pay additional tax when they purchase a product or service. The profiteers who run the churches are unfairly enriched if they don't have to pay their fair share. This causes the people who donate to pay additional tax to pick up the slack.
Feb 20, 2009 at 11:24 a.m.
Suggest removal
Now, that is a quote for posterity, gfan! That says it all.
Feb 20, 2009 at 11:17 a.m.
Suggest removal
alethiea, be nice, like Jesus would like you to be.
Since we will be taxed, people and organizations should pay their fair share.
Jesus was pro-tax: "Pay unto Caesar......."
Feb 20, 2009 at 11:09 a.m.
Suggest removal
If the government taxed organized delusion, the tax burden will lesson for everyone else and the national IQ and literacy level would eventually rise.
Feb 20, 2009 at 11:04 a.m.
Suggest removal
This travel fee will create a chain reaction for higher costs of products you buy do to higher shipping fees,tourist revenues will decline do to less travel,auto sale will drop do to less usage,auto repair and parts replacement will deline do to less usage,oil companies will lose revenues,bus fairs will increase. Many more people will lose their jobs do to this ignorant idea. It's apparent that these idiots haven't thought this plan out, for this is just the tip of the iceberg.
Feb 20, 2009 at 11 a.m.
Suggest removal
If the Church weren't tax exempt, everyone else would be paying less tax.
Feb 20, 2009 at 10:44 a.m.
Suggest removal
Vicki McKenna is hitting the nail on the head this morning.
Feb 20, 2009 at 10:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
Also was anyone as mad as me when he also said he would release prisoners who were nonviolent early to cut costs?? They sure have their priorities upside down there!! Cut your own salary Doyle and don't let prisoners who deserve to be there out before their time! What a dumb thing to do, just like Obama wanting the gitmo prisoners mainlined in our prisons!!! Would you like those terrorists in your state?? I sure don't!!!
Feb 20, 2009 at 10:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
I find it interesting that one would mention that all "they" want is to save their own jobs and make cuts/taxes elsewhere to do that. I found a 117pg GM report to congress on the internet that outlines their restructioning plans. On page there is a graph which depicts salary positions remaining constant while hourly wage positions and plants in operation are cut dramatically between 2009 and 2014. Check out pg. 88 of the GM Restructuring Plan Milestones.
http://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/eesa...
Feb 20, 2009 at 9:26 a.m.
Suggest removal
Glad I didn't vote for these goofs. Oh by the way, "I told you so!"
Brother Comrade Brzezinski would you like to come over for dinner we are having Vodka with potato soup. All Hail the Motherland.
Feb 20, 2009 at 9:22 a.m.
Suggest removal
Yeah did you notice Doyle said he wouldn't raise taxes but like anotheropinion said all these fees!!! And the other night he (Doyle) said he wouldn't cut any government positions! I say to cut costs cut some of those high paying government jobs and cut some of their pay as we have had to do! They don't have a clue up there in madison or washington dc they all get to keep their jobs and get raises and bonuses too!!!
Feb 20, 2009 at 9:20 a.m.
Suggest removal
I wonder how they are going to make this apply to the Amish with their horse and buggies, maybe a chip in the horses a**? Oh then they get charged tax for letting the horse graze around the pasture, this is just rediculous
Feb 20, 2009 at 9:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
from the artical..........Privacy concerns are based more on perception than any actual risk, Atkinson said. The satellite information would be beamed one way to the car and driving information would be contained within the device on the car, with the amount of the tax due the only information that's downloaded, he said.
I totaly beleive this.........Right I agree with nogo's last post..
Feb 20, 2009 at 9:08 a.m.
Suggest removal
Not only will it penalize people that buy more fuel-efficient cars think about this. You don’t need that many cops anymore all you need is a computer system could see that Billy bob hit 78 miles an hour and send him a ticket. Also government could sell your driving habits to companies. Think of all the other consequences of this. You can also argue the good this can do. Little joey’s car hasn’t moved for five minutes send a cop and find out he was in an accident. Danny drunk is driving erratically send a cop find out he is drunk. AMBER Alert, description blue corolla bring up a map find all blue corollas in the area send cops. I just don’t like the whole big brother about this.
Feb 20, 2009 at 8:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
I guess we are running out of smokers to tax? I for one am tired of all these usage taxes. It's tax creep...you don't see it coming. Doyle said he wouldn't raise income taxes, well with all these fees he already has.
If they refuse to cut spending, then at least tell us straight up how much of our wallets they intend to take and propose an income tax increase. That way we can vote them out next time.
Feb 20, 2009 at 8:41 a.m.
Suggest removal
Just a Machiavellian (sp?) move to make a national toll system more palatable.
*
But thanks for another "stimulas."
Feb 20, 2009 at 8:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
ooops let me clairify that......I don't have rats in my house LOL
Feb 20, 2009 at 8:22 a.m.
Suggest removal
I smell a rat................
Feb 20, 2009 at 8:19 a.m.
Suggest removal
You got that right rooster
Feb 20, 2009 at 8:17 a.m.
Suggest removal
should be good for the quy or girl that has no choice but to drive for their occupation. another way government will styfle the economy. these guys can't think up this garbage fast enough. like the banks when a check gets refused payment for lack of funds, lets say an oversight on the guy that wrote the check, and even though the check gets made good in 30 minutes, still gets charged a penalty of 25-30 bucks. why? because the actuaries have figured out that they can make a killing for the banks that a computer generates through no cost to the banking establishment. meanwhile the crooks at the top steeling millions and even billions get away scott free....only in the freedom loving usa.
Feb 20, 2009 at 8:14 a.m.
Suggest removal
another problem with this is the big brother effect......how in the heck are they going to put GPS chips in every car?? and whos gonna pay for that??? oh i forgot....... tax tax tax Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Hey everyone get you shovels out time to get some exercise.....more snow on its way!!!! YUCK
STAY SAFE!!
Feb 20, 2009 at 8:10 a.m.
Suggest removal
Yep.....tax tax tax......this guy is an idiot tax tax tax.....they want you to conserve energy and then tax you cause they arn't getting the revenue cause you arn't driving as much... Grrrrrrrrrrrr. I've said it before and I'll say it again......HOLD ON TO YOUR WALLETS!! Its going to get a lot worse......
usaret ..... I think the price was 1/4 of a penny per mile.......tax tax tax
Feb 20, 2009 at 8:05 a.m.
Suggest removal
North Carolina is considering a quarter cent per mile according to the article. This is probably an attempt to address the real and anticipated loss of revenue from electric vehicles that would use the road system, but not pay a user fee through gasoline taxes.
Feb 20, 2009 at 7:09 a.m.
Suggest removal
Just another attempt to grab more money to fund projects that are not necessarly related to the highway funding. It worked before because the funds were used the way they were suppose to be but today, for some reason, they get borrowed (?) to fund this or that special program and then they have to come up with another reason to tax us to fund the highway program. Has anyone seen what the charge would be per mile?
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.