BTC instructors' pay going up

By FRANK SCHULTZ ( Contact )   Thursday, Feb. 19, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Contract details


Other major provisions of the 2008-11 contract between Blackhawk Tech and its faculty union:

-- A new "wellness incentive" to hold down premium payments for those who join the wellness program. The program will encourage preventive health measures and diet, fitness and educational activities. Those who choose the wellness program and the lowest-cost health plan will pay no additional premium.

-- A job-security provision requiring that if the administration is contemplating a layoff, it must first consider cuts to part-time staff and to the "overload" of teachers who are paid extra for teaching beyond the normal course load.

-- A $600 incentive for members who notify BTC at least six months before their retirement dates.

-- A new, more comprehensive system of faculty evaluation, assessment and goal-setting to replace classroom visits by supervisors. In the past, probationary employees were visited twice a year, and others were visited once.

-- Payment of all employees by direct deposit.

— Faculty members at Blackhawk Technical College will see salary increases of at least 3 percent this year and in each of the following two years.

The BTC Board unanimously approved the three-year contract Wednesday night. The Blackhawk Technical Faculty Federation, Local 2308, ratified the contract this week, said Brian Gohlke, BTC's human resources director.

The contract is retroactive to July 1, 2008. Gohlke said each cell on the salary schedule is increased by 3 percent this school year. The increase is 3.25 percent in each of the following two years.

A majority of BTC instructors have reached the end of the salary schedule, so they will see only the 3 and 3.25 percent increases, Gohlke.

Those still receiving additional pay for advancing one year on the schedule will see raises close to 4 percent, Gohlke said.

Some teachers will get additional raises granted when they reach certain milestones in college credits.

The average base salary for the 113 members of the bargaining unit this year will be $68,858, Gohlke said.

BTC Board Chairman Tom Westrick defended the contract when asked about the many local taxpayers who have been laid off recently or whose employers are not handing out any raises this year.

"Blackhawk has been through some very trying times this year with the explosion of enrollment. The faculty and the administration have done a very wonderful job dealing with that … and board felt it was a very acceptable increase," Westrick said this morning.

Gohlke also defended the raises.

First, the contract was tentatively agreed to in November, so the increases were based on last fall's economic situation, not those of today, Gohlke said.

Second, the faculty have been working extra hard to provide services to the influx of laid-off workers, Gohlke said.

Classes that might have had 15 to 20 students now are up to 20 or 30, Gohlke said. In addition, many of the new students need extra help to handle college classes, and some come with frustrations from being laid off, so staff members have to deal with all those issues.

"They've kicked it in gear pretty hard," Gohlke said, and productivity is up.

Any industry going through such a high-production period is likely to increase compensation, Gohlke said.

But he said BTC rightfully comes under more scrutiny because it's a public institution.

BTC has added 10 limited-term faculty members this year to deal with a big influx of students. Two were added in August and eight more in January.

BTC is sensitive to the economic realities, Gohlke insisted: "We do understand that there's been a lot of recent activity that's been very negative, detrimental, to our communities here in Rock and Green counties."

When benefits are added to the salary increases, the contract's cost to the district is a 4.97 percent increase this year, 4.9 percent in 2009-10 and 4.97 percent in 2010-11, Gohlke said.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(33)
Sandman
Apr 9, 2009 at 5:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

BTC represents the best locally available, highly-subsidized, instructor-centric ADULT DAY CARE CENTER around. Even students who are not remotely likely to get a job in their "chosen field" are encouraged to attend (BTC won't turn down an FTE in the face of all odds, and a quick survey will confirm there's no shortage of "odds"!). Accordingly, BTC will certainly dumb down its classes to keep student numbers up so it can metastasize its operations even further!
A completely wasteful and useless over-designed entrance atrium (nice picture effect for ads, though -- makes it look like it's a "real college"!); ill-designed, inconvenient and incompetently widely spread out parking lots; four (count 'em, FOUR! -- check out WCTC for a functional layout) very expensive 24-hour electronic message boards at the TWO entrance drives to advertise (what else?) BTC!; and all-night lighting, even in the parking lots! All at taxpayer expense!
What's next -- family fairs, airshows, mud volleyball, beer gardens? Fireworks and Sunday services in several languages? Then it might even be able to compete with the New Life "church"! But why not? Both organizations operate primarily on a heavy dose of "faith" over reality, and both get a completely free ride on taxation of their assets and income!

wondering1
Feb 20, 2009 at 11:18 a.m.
Suggest removal

I'm sure this will end up being reflective in everyones property taxes, even though the bulk of the training is geared towards retraining displaced workers from the GM fallout, in fact what happened to the millions that our state granted GM to keep the Janesville plant going, should that money be taken back and used for funding the retraining and not put on Rock Co. tax rolls

darwin1
Feb 20, 2009 at 8:40 a.m.
Suggest removal

Instructors at BTC are given approximately 3% pay increases every year even when the inflation rate is higher than that, they are also required to continue their education to keep their employment that they are not fully reimbursed for unlike other companies including GM. Shouldn't we be going back to see what raises were given to others such as administrative staff to fully place these things in context. Privatization would mean fewer nurses and other medical personal adding to the already high cost of medical care.

SarahB
Feb 20, 2009 at 12:23 a.m.
Suggest removal

Just a short question indirectly related to the issue: Is it necessary to keep BTC's lights on all night?! Don't tell me it is for the cleaning crews either. The lights are on all night! Energy is money. (Thank you. Now you may return to your regularly scheduled forum.)

fedupfreddy
Feb 19, 2009 at 9:54 p.m.
Suggest removal

I work part time as an instructor at BTC (in addition to my full time day job) to make ends meet. I have to say, the teachers I see work very, very hard. Partly because of the wages, BTC has had a hard time recruiting and keeping instructors. BTC instructors do not make what they would make in the private sector. Also, there are not enough qualified teachers to keep pace with the massive increase in enrollment. The State of Wisconsin (Jim Doyle, where are you??) should be THROWING money at BTC, U-Rock, and any other non-private, non-liberal arts institutions to equip people with skills and education needed to get them working.

justsome1here
Feb 19, 2009 at 9:05 p.m.
Suggest removal

Full time instructors have prep time and non-student contact hours built into the schedule. This may vary with the part time instructors.

Tusker
Feb 19, 2009 at 8:54 p.m.
Suggest removal

For the record, Blackhawk Tech's enrollment doesn't "drop with a bad economy" - it RISES. When times are bad in the local economy (as they are now), BTC is very busy because people are retraining for job changes. When times are good again, enrollments tend to return to normal. In short, BTC's activity level is inverse to what's happening in the job market, and in times like this its role is doubly improtant. And, so long as the economy remains slow, I can guarantee that BTC's teachers will be working their buns off to accomodate those in need of retraining.

Comments below by videogame2009, nurse4u, and opinion80 ring true.

justsome1here
Feb 19, 2009 at 6:25 p.m.
Suggest removal

If Blackhawk Tech is increasing salaries then tuition needs to be adjusted accordingly to offset those costs. The taxpayers are already shouldering the burden of paying for the remodeling and expansion of the school. Some may argue that an increase in tuition would be a limiting factor in getting an education, however, it is nothing compared to the skyrocketing costs of tuition plus room and board that four year colleges have seen over the past several years.

opinion80
Feb 19, 2009 at 5:45 p.m.
Suggest removal

The entire admin staff at BTC is laden with overpaid arrogant people, (just look for Eric Larson in his car some day and take a peek at the license plate), why shouldn't the teachers, the ones that really do all the work at BTC, get paid just as well. The increases won't even bring most of them close to the salary Gohlke and other admin are earning.

Remember the article about the title change to for Gohlke and a couple of other job titles a year or so ago. Huge increases in salaries were given with the title changes but no apparent added responsibilities. The teachers are the ones doing all the work there, please don't complain about their pay. I'll bet most of the full-time teaching staff spends 60+ hours a week doing their jobs. That comes out to about $22/hr at 68k a year. Less than what a line worker at GM was making. Cut them some slack. Don't forget, our tax dollars pay for the admin too and the board always seem to approve pay raises for them, this truly is taxation without representation.

nurse4u
Feb 19, 2009 at 4:59 p.m.
Suggest removal

They deserve every penny.

nurse4u
Feb 19, 2009 at 4:58 p.m.
Suggest removal

BTC helped me achieve my career goals. All of my instructors really care about their students and their success. They go above and beyond their job descriptions.

Pam Hendricks, nursing instructor at BTC, every year sponsors a family at Christmas with the help of students and faculty.

IvoteIspeak
Feb 19, 2009 at 3:40 p.m.
Suggest removal

Yes I See all of the work that the teachers put in. I am an out of work Lear employee that is going to Blackhawk. BUT with the economy as bad as it is riht now I think that an increase in pay that comes out of the tax payers for any thing is the wrong place and the wrong time. Even back in November the economy was bad and heading to worse.Please stop adding burden to the tax payers. A little here a little there = alot of money that people dont have right now.

tguy
Feb 19, 2009 at 3:19 p.m.
Suggest removal

never mind misread it

tguy
Feb 19, 2009 at 3:18 p.m.
Suggest removal

last line came out wrong.

tguy
Feb 19, 2009 at 3:15 p.m.
Suggest removal

Hey Gohike and Westrick . WAKE UP your tuition and book fees are high enough.. Now you want to give these teachers raises in the toughest times we ever had? The economy was bad in november when you decided this. Are we
supposed to feel sorry for these teachers?

wisconsinheat
Feb 19, 2009 at 2:58 p.m.
Suggest removal

This is TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION at its' finest.

The board that approves these raises is NOT elected and Does NOT answer to the taxpayer.

It's time to change that.

videogame2009
Feb 19, 2009 at 1:28 p.m.
Suggest removal

Teachers don't work 9 months out of the year. There is a lot of prep work, classes, and administrative work done during the summer months. Also, during the school year, if you can find me a teacher that works only 8 hours a day, I'll give you a gold star. You're right they should be grateful they have a job, but they also put in a lot of hard work. I don't understand what this country has against teachers. Without them, people would be running around illiterate and unprepared for a new life. I for one am smart enough to know that my teachers played a huge part in my future.

RUSerious
Feb 19, 2009 at 12:19 p.m.
Suggest removal

rep-of-1, Believe it or not, I think you are right. I'm just saying that it sounded like (in your statement ""Gm's emergency closure could have been restricted as enrollment became full.") GM workers should not have been let go so fast. I'm sure I was just misunderstanding your meaning, and wanted to know what that statement DID mean.
On the other hand, they should not be double-penalized by not being allowed to enroll because others who had the luxury of time had enrolled first.
You are correct of course, in that the quality of your education could very well suffer because the same number of teachers are teaching many more students. If those teachers get a raise, will their teaching ability suddenly get better? (I do understand, of course, that they will undoubtedly work harder, but, through no fault of their own, the benefits to individual students will be far less.)
The remark about GM workers (in response to your wish that they hadn't crowded the campus) was because of people denigrating them so often in previous stories. Often comments referenced their lack of education, their desire to get one, and/or telling them to get one and work for their money the way everyone else had to.
I certainly understand your position. Recent events and economic trends have been unkind to almost everyone (not counting kiowamohigan, who is apparently making a killing in the stock market.)
The best solution, if possible, would be to hire more teachers. If they could, and if necessary and in fairness to the students (the very purpose of the facility) suspend salary increases in favor of faculty increases.
No, I am no longer a student.

sannio
Feb 19, 2009 at 11:49 a.m.
Suggest removal

I've never gotten pay raises like that even in the best of times.

rep_of_1
Feb 19, 2009 at 11:46 a.m.
Suggest removal

RUserious are you a student? Did you start in a program that has the equipment and staff to handle 12 students and now has 22? The nursing program had a petition process that has been scrapped for now with the current situation. The fact is and will remain BTC did what it could to take on as many students in the two year allotment that money is being offered for education from displaced workers. The plan is short sighted and when the dust settles things will go back to business as usual. I am all for anyone getting an education don't pin that on me. However I paid for a quality education I should get what I paid for.

Hockeyjockey
Feb 19, 2009 at 11:29 a.m.
Suggest removal

I'm sure they will pay for the raises by raising our property taxes, which they do every year without worrying about the consequences, because they have a non-elected board.

RUSerious
Feb 19, 2009 at 11:25 a.m.
Suggest removal

rep-of-1: "Gm's emergency closure could have been restricted as enrollment became full."
Does this mean what it sounds like? Do you really think that would have been feasible?
Keep in mind, many people commenting on those stories about GM workers suggested they go back to school and "earn" their keep the way most people do, by educating themselves.
I am aware of course that it is a story about BTC, a great local educational facility. I wonder about the comment "contract was tentatively agreed to in November, so the increases were based on last fall's economic situation, not those of today." I didn't recall the economic climate being that rosy 3 or 4 months ago, but it wasn't ratified until just yesterday.
Too bad the increased enrollment situation couldn't have put more educators to work.

rep_of_1
Feb 19, 2009 at 10:59 a.m.
Suggest removal

Btc is still one the bargains in education we have that trains for the job/career market. Enrollment in the course of hvac/r I'm in has nearly doubled(glad I'm almost done). Little was done to accommodate the gm influx other than handing the instructors more class loads and increasing class size. Being a student I don't have enough tools and resources at my disposal now with the influx. Gm's emergency closure could have been restricted as enrollment became full. It makes the rest of us that are in BTC prior to shut down have to suffer with no compensation.

RichE95
Feb 19, 2009 at 10:38 a.m.
Suggest removal

Blackhawk Tech should be privatized so workers face the same realty as the private sector workers who pay their wages.

woodsman
Feb 19, 2009 at 10:32 a.m.
Suggest removal

UAW EXTINCTION,your goofy! If anything the UNIONS are going to get stronger in the coming years. Without them,most would be on welfare,by wage comparison.

rooster
Feb 19, 2009 at 9:53 a.m.
Suggest removal

union contract no doubt. btc is shortsighted in that layoffs will occur there too in the forseeable future. now would be the time to nip it in the bud, but they won't. unions are by definition selfish. now that the uaw is facing extinction, they too are looking at massive give backs. it remains to be seen if they are too late or not.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT