Obama unveils $75 billion mortgage relief plan

By ASSOCIATED PRESS   Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— Seeking to tackle "a crisis unlike any we've ever known," President Barack Obama unveiled an ambitious $75 billion plan Wednesday to keep as many as 9 million Americans from losing their homes to foreclosure.

Announcing the plan in Arizona — a state especially hard hit by the housing crunch — Obama said that turning around the battered economy requires stemming the continuing tide of foreclosures. The housing crisis that began last year set many other factors in motion and helped lead to the current, widening recession.

"In the end, all of us are paying a price for this home mortgage crisis," Obama said at a high school outside Phoenix. "And all of us will pay an even steeper price if we allow this crisis to deepen."

But while talking in broad strokes about the importance of the issue to the economy as a whole, the president took care not to miss the pain that the housing problems are causing in individual families

"The American Dream is being tested by a home mortgage crisis that not only threatens the stability of our economy but also the stability of families and neighborhoods," he said. "While this crisis is vast, it begins just one house and one family at a time."

More expensive than expected, Obama's plan aims to keep between 7 million and 9 million people from foreclosure. Of the nearly 52 million U.S. homeowners with a mortgage, about 13.8 million, or nearly 27 percent, owe more on their mortgage than their house is now worth, according to Moody's Economy.com.

Headlining Obama's plan is a $75 billion Homeowner Stability Initiative, which would provide a set of incentives to mortgage lenders in an effort to convince them to help up to 4 million borrowers on the verge of foreclosure. The goal: cut monthly mortgage payments to sustainable levels, defined as no more than 31 percent of a homeowners income. Funding would come from the $700 billion financial industry bailout passed by Congress last fall.

Another key component would specifically help those said to be "under water" — with dwellings whose market value have sunk below the principal still owed on the mortgages. Such mortgages have traditionally been almost impossible to refinance. But the White House said its program will help 4 million to 5 million families do just that — if their mortgages are owned or guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.

Housing Secretary Shaun Donovan stressed that homeowners don't need to be delinquent in order to get help.

"This is necessary policy. It's smart economics. And it's just and fair," Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told reporters.

Asked why the cost had jumped to $75 billion from initial talk of a $50 billion effort, Geithner said, "We think that's necessary to make a program like this work."

And he said relief would be almost instantaneous, basically as soon as rules are published March 4. "You'll start to see the effects quite quickly", Geithner said.

Sheila Bair, chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, said previous efforts had largely flopped. "We've not attacked the problem at the core," she told reporters. "We are woefully behind the curve."

The biggest players in the mortgage industry already had halted foreclosures pending Obama's announcement.

"The plan I'm announcing focuses on rescuing families who have played by the rules and acted responsibly," Obama said. "It will not rescue the unscrupulous or irresponsible by throwing good taxpayer money after bad loans."

He issued a warning as well: "All of us must learn to live within our means again."

He said the plan will not help those who took risky bets by buying homes to sell them, not live in them, or dishonest lenders who distorted facts for naive buyers, or buyers who signed on for loans they knew they could not afford.

"This plan will not save every home," Obama said.

In tandem with the foreclosure plan, the Treasury Department announced it would double the size of its lifeline to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, seeking to bolster confidence in the mortgage giants effectively taken over by the government last fall. The government said it would absorb up to $200 billion in losses at each company, by using money Congress set aside last year, and will continue purchasing mortgage-backed securities from them.

The Treasury said the increased support for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac didn't reflect projected losses at the two companies. The two companies are currently projected to need a combined government subsidy of about $66 billion, well short of the new promise of up to $400 billion.

Asked about the doubling of the guarantees for Fannie and Freddie, Geithner said: "This is not a judgment about the expected losses ahead. It underscores commitment, and that is very important to help keep mortgage rates low." Geithner said most not all of the money would come the financial bailout fund.

The president's announcement came a day after he signed into law a $787 billion economic stimulus plan he hopes will spark an economic turnaround and create or save 3.5 million jobs.

At the same time, the administration was grappling with the darkening prospects for the U.S. auto industry.

Even as Detroit carmakers submitted restructuring plans to qualify for continued government loans, General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC asked for another $14 billion in bailout cash.

Alan Zibel reported from Washington; Associated Press Writers Liz Sidoti and Martin Crutsinger also contributed to this report.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(10)
gman5284
Feb 28, 2009 at 10:13 p.m.
Suggest removal

Who will get bailed out when all of these reverse mortgages have to be re-paid. As I have said on other threads, the folks who will be responsible for the debt probably would not have qualified for the loans in the first place. I see more defaults coming on this one.

RetiredAirForce
Feb 19, 2009 at 5:08 a.m.
Suggest removal

Even if this slows the default rate on mortgages, it does nothing to stimulate the housing market (to raise home values). Without stimulus for investors, yes tax reduction, there is no incentive to purchase real estate with no bottom in sight. There will be no bottom until investors have an incentive to purchase!

kiowamohican
Feb 19, 2009 at 1:51 a.m.
Suggest removal

Hey remember when Obama was elected; many at the celebration said things like "now I don't have to worry about my mortgage, or putting gas in my car". They were serious. If you bought a house you can't afford, hey no worries, its not your fault. The government will bail you out.
.
No worries anymore folks. Just sit back wait for your government check to arrive!! If your good, you may even get your free car, and free gas for it. The latest town hall meeting Obama was at in FL had people say they wanted a new kitchen, and dining set, and somehow that was the Presidents responsibility. After all, we are all entitled to this now from our wonderful government.

RetiredAirForce
Feb 19, 2009 at 12:49 a.m.
Suggest removal

75 billion and 9 million Americans. Comes out to $8333.33 per. This on top of the almost $3000 per US citizen stimulus cost (before interest). Why was this not part of the original TARP or stimulus if it was needed [instead of taking money from TARP]?

DavidG
Feb 18, 2009 at 11:36 p.m.
Suggest removal

Remember when we were saying its the economy stupid? Now we are more focused and can say its housing, period! Thats what got us into this mess, and that's what is going to get us out of it. There is a misconception that loans to people who could not afford them led to this mess and I'm not surprised that many see it this way. The bigger problem is that speculators, greedy lenders, insane hedge fund operators, and little or no regulation has led us into this mess. Just as government can be blamed for getting us into this, we have to accept government has a role in getting us out of this hole. That's what this new guy is doing. The nation was in debt over the war but that did not generate the conservative outcry that we have now. Why not?

sannio
Feb 18, 2009 at 11:14 p.m.
Suggest removal

We need more Libertarians in office if we want this fiasco to end. A Libertarian it not a liberal, but more like a Republican. We need to start taking fiscal responsibility for ourselves, and stop living in debt expecting the government to bail us out. Every time we ask the government to help us, we end up with less freedom and liberty than before. By taking responsibility for our own lives, and respecting the lives of others, we can be a pillar to the world to which they can turn to for guidance.

paytomuchtax
Feb 18, 2009 at 8:50 p.m.
Suggest removal

This won't help anyone

usaret
Feb 18, 2009 at 3:55 p.m.
Suggest removal

When will the maddness stop? In attempting to get a portion of the populace out of the poor-house, our President, with the help of an overly compliant congress, is on the verge of putting the whole country in the poor-house. Is this the change that we want or thought we were getting?
So far it seems the only people benefitting from these bailouts are the very rich that we are suppose to be taking the money from in the first place to pay for all these programs.

tjncj
Feb 18, 2009 at 3:03 p.m.
Suggest removal

Keep piling the debt on!. I wish I would have bought a big fancy house I couldn't afford so the government could bail me out. This living beneath our means will come back to haunt us.

DrTalk
Feb 18, 2009 at 2:45 p.m.
Suggest removal

Government mandates banks lend money to people that couldn't get loans otherwise, banks comply, people who shouldn't have gotten loans default on their loans, banks fail, government bails out people at tax payer expense...
.
When will people realize individuals and governments alike cannot borrow their way out of debt. The economy will be bad until individuals and government should not live beyond their means.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT