Town of Beloit investigates racial slurs

By ANN MARIE AMES   Tuesday, Feb. 10, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

— Racial slurs sparked a recent union vote of no confidence in the town of Beloit police chief and a "tense" atmosphere in the department, according to a Jan. 2 report.

But Town Administrator Bob Museus said complaints the police union filed against Police Chief John Wilson are politically motivated.

"The union is taking a shot at John," Museus said this morning.

The report was written by Milwaukee attorney Alan Levy, who was hired by the town to investigate a complaint filed against Wilson on Dec. 12 by Teamsters Union Local 695, which represents the police officers and clerks.

According to the complaint, Wilson used racial slurs in the police department in front of employees. He also used a racist term on the phone with a local towing company, the complaint states.

The racial comments took place in 2006 and 2008, and eight specific instances were cited, according to the report.

Wilson admitted to using some of the language mentioned in the union complaint, but he did not agree with each allegation, according to the report.

The Janesville Gazette obtained copies of the complaint and the investigation results through Wisconsin’s Open Records Law.

The complaint surfaced while the town is negotiating police contracts, and some union members are using the issue for political gain, Museus said.

The town will not "surrender" management rights to the union, he said.

Wilson is "quite contrite" and has apologized to the town board and to Museus, Museus said. Wilson has been reprimanded in writing and required to take a counseling or sensitivity program, according to the report.

The actions probably were stricter than they would have been if a similar complaint had been filed against an officer, Museus said.

The Gazette was unable to reach a union representative or Wilson for comment this morning.

Wilson has worked for the town of Beloit since 2003. He retired as the Bollingbrook, Ill., police chief in 1997.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(23)
gracies42
Feb 19, 2009 at 4:11 p.m.
Suggest removal

the position of deputy chief has been deleted, both office positions have been cut from full time to part time...with no benefits or reduced benefits....and THEN the hiring of TWO full time administrative assistants...mmmmmm and this all saves the Town of Beloit how much??? Budget cuts...I doubt it. And why now? Why not when they were doing the budget? Has the budget for 2009 been approved for 2009? I wonder if they knew they would have to do budget cuts then....? One would think if it is your job to prepare a budget you would know this up front and not after the fact....just food for thought....and I may have this wrong but this is how I see it. This is how employees are treated when they report wrong doing?

munchkin
Feb 19, 2009 at 2:40 p.m.
Suggest removal

We don't know what was said, in what context and whether or not the rememberance of the incidents in question were not compromised over the 2 or 3 (depending on how one is counting it) year span of time.
Why did folks wait 2 to 3 years to lodge a complaint?
I think Museus made the right conclusion that this ***could*** be related to negotiations.
I even suspect that the Police Union there may be getting some very savvy help from another old union president in how to push their adgenda. The Township in long years past was not savvy enough to deal with a certain union.
It's all about power baby.

You have got to be kidding - We don't know what was said, in what context - it doesn't matter the context. Do you know what these employees are going through???? Maybe you should read about the retaliation. NO employee should go to work and be called names, threatened with termination on a regular basis and retaliated against. By the way, the town has taken all contract negotiations off the table NOT the union employees. Get a clue.

munchkin
Feb 18, 2009 at 11:22 a.m.
Suggest removal

And the retaliation has started - the 2 office employees have had their hours cut.

Professor
Feb 12, 2009 at 3:58 p.m.
Suggest removal

If Reggie is right about Mr. Levy's prior representation of the Town, then they might as well save their money if a truly UNBIASED investigation is desired. How absurd! Not to mention the ethical responsibility Mr. Levy would seem to have. He can't be 'advocate' for the Township in one setting, and 'unbiased investigator' in another, with his prior client being one of the parties. It would be like the Township's city attorney being asked to step into the role of 'neutral and detached magistrate' for one case that also involved the Township. But then again, pesky little things like constitutional rights, laws, and such haven't seemed to be real relevant in the past down there, so why start now.

JohnDoe
Feb 11, 2009 at 11:55 p.m.
Suggest removal

If in fact you are a minority...how do you explain your stereotype of these officers, if it would not be acceptable to you for them to stereotype you?

JohnDoe
Feb 11, 2009 at 11:45 p.m.
Suggest removal

What is " people like me "?

wangytang
Feb 11, 2009 at 11:41 p.m.
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
munchkin
Feb 11, 2009 at 6:06 p.m.
Suggest removal

aletheia - what's your take on this complaint now?

Reggie1195
Feb 11, 2009 at 5:12 p.m.
Suggest removal

guess I should rephrase that...some of the articles don't mention that he was hired by the town...in any case would he not have a special intrest in pleasing the town.

Reggie1195
Feb 11, 2009 at 5:09 p.m.
Suggest removal

I find it odd that none of the articles that I have read mention that Mr. Levy was hired by the town to conduct this investigation, which leads me to think, who's pocket is he in. Of course he will side step the real issue and pull in favor of the town. Besides that he has in the past represented the Town of Beloit during those contract negotiations. So who would be the one with the agenda.

mrwilson
Feb 10, 2009 at 9:22 p.m.
Suggest removal

A letter of reprimand?? Is'nt management held to a higher standard? So if an Officer uses a racial slur what is the punishment, a verbal warning? The ultimate responsibility lies with the Town Administrator and the Town Board to do what is best for the community and it citizens. I personally believe having a racist Police Chief goes against everything this country stands for, especially during this historic point in time (a black President). An interesting question needs to be asked, what race(s) did he target? Once this is exposed my thought is the leaders that represent the minority(s) should be asking for the Chiefs head in a basket.

wisconsinheat
Feb 10, 2009 at 7:34 p.m.
Suggest removal

It looks like Town Administrator Bob Museus is compounding the problem.

MeanBloggers
Feb 10, 2009 at 7 p.m.
Suggest removal

Why would the Town support a racist police chief? What do "management rights" have to do with any of this?

Maybe Town Administrator Museus should make decisions based on what's best for the Town and not what's best for his ego.

disgusted1
Feb 10, 2009 at 6:56 p.m.
Suggest removal

Not only do the officers of the township not likeing the chief but neither are the people of the township or the surrounding area. Because of his policies he has alienated the township to the point no one wants to come into the township to visit or socialize. There is a new name out there for the township it is now called the gauntlet. People will drive threw but will not stop. They are afraid of the intrapment the police are doing now. They pull you over with lame excuses such as your license plate light is out just to see if you have been drinking so they can slam you with a owi. I heard they pulled over a 70 something lady with that license plate light excuse and gave her over $100 fine. Because you see the town of beloit police dept are not aloud to hand out warning tickets. If you get pulled over your going to get a ticket. So now you see why the TOWN OF BELOIT

Professor
Feb 10, 2009 at 6:05 p.m.
Suggest removal

Mr. Right--First, this article isn't about 'me', so please don't try and make it that way. Second, I have nothing to hide about my 'record'; since cowardice is something you apparently loathe, email me with who you are, and specifically what you 'heard', and I'll reply. Otherwise, I'm not interested!

mrright
Feb 10, 2009 at 4:57 p.m.
Suggest removal

Professor how clean is your record? From what I have heard, you burn your fellow officers every chance you get. We call that a coward!

touchofreality
Feb 10, 2009 at 4:48 p.m.
Suggest removal

If I remember correctly, several years ago a Beloit Township officer was suspended without pay for using a racial slur. Wonder if he can get a letter of reprimand and trade it in for 2 weeks pay.

thescoop
Feb 10, 2009 at 4:45 p.m.
(This comment was removed by the site staff.)
Professor
Feb 10, 2009 at 12:42 p.m.
Suggest removal

Political motivation, huh? What would it have been if an officer had been accused of that--contrite or not? No surprise one incident involved a towning company, considering the chief's affinity for towing; I WONDER what that conversation was? The next excuse from the administrator will be that 'these were only isolated incidents, and did not reflect the chief's true feelings...' Boy, Bollingbrook P.D. sure has supplied some interesting cops....

munchkin
Feb 10, 2009 at 10:59 a.m.
Suggest removal

So it's "management rights" to use racial slurs. And "politically motivated" - I doubt that. Citizens should be in an uproar over this - there is NO place for this language.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT