From Beijing to bongs
WASHINGTON It’s hell being a celebrity, especially if you’re young and find yourself at a party, where marijuana and cameras should never mix.
And it’s not exactly heaven being sheriff of a county with escalating drug crimes and pressure to treat all offenders equally. Thus it is that Olympian swimmer Michael Phelps and Sheriff Leon Lott of South Carolina’s Richland County are being forced to treat seriously a crime that shouldn’t be one.
As everyone knows by now, Phelps was photographed smoking from an Olympic-sized bong during a University of South Carolina party last November. As all fallen heroes must—by writ of the Pitchforks & Contrition Act—Phelps has apologized for behavior that was “regrettable and demonstrated bad judgment,” and has promised never to be a lesser role model again.
Check.
Lott, meanwhile, is threatening action against Phelps because … he has to. Widely respected and admired as a “good guy” who came up through the ranks, Lott is in a jam. Not one to sweat the small stuff, he nevertheless has said that he’ll charge Phelps with a crime if he determines that the 14-time gold-medal winner did, in fact, smoke pot in his county.
The sheriff’s job will be made both easier and tougher by evidence that includes a photograph of Phelps with his face buried in a smoke-filled tube and what Lott has called a “partial confession.” Phelps has said that the photo is legit. The only missing link, apparently, is the exact location of the party. What’s tough is that Lott probably doesn’t want to press charges because it’s a waste of time and resources. He’s got much bigger fish to fry, but several recent drug-related crimes—including at least two high-profile murders—have captured community attention. And the law is the law. Therein lies the problem.
Our marijuana laws have been ludicrous for as long as we’ve been alive. Almost half of us (42 percent) have tried marijuana at least once, according to a report published last year in PLoS Medicine, a journal of the Public Library of Science.
The United States, in fact, boasts the highest percentage of pot smokers among 17 nations surveyed, including The Netherlands, where cannabis clouds waft from coffeehouse windows. Among them are no small number of high-ranking South Carolina leaders (we knew us when), who surely cringe every time a young person gets fingered for a “crime” they themselves have committed.
Other better-known former tokers include our current president and a couple of previous ones, as well as a Supreme Court justice, to name just a few. A complete list would require the slaughter of several mature forests.
This we know: Were Phelps to run for public office someday and admit to having smoked pot in his youth, he would be forgiven. Yet, in the present, we impose monstrous expectations on our heroes. Several hand-wringing commentaries have surfaced the past few days, lamenting the tragic loss for disappointed moms, dads and, yes, The Children.
Understandably, parents worry that their kids will emulate their idol, but the problem isn’t Phelps, who is, in fact, an adult. The problem is our laws—and our lies. Obviously, children shouldn’t smoke anything, legal or otherwise. Nor should they drink alcoholic beverages, even though their parents might. There are good reasons for substance restrictions for children that need not apply to adults.
That’s the real drug message that should inform our children and our laws, rather than the nonsense that currently passes for drug information. Today’s anti-drug campaigns are slightly wonkier than yesterday’s “Reefer Madness,” but equally likely to become party hits rather than drug deterrents.
One recent ad produced by the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy says: “Hey, not trying to be your mom, but there aren’t many jobs out there for potheads.” Whoa, dude, except maybe, like, president of the United States. Once a kid realizes that pot doesn’t make him insane—or likely to become a burrito taster, as the ad further asserts—he might figure other drug information is equally false. That’s how marijuana becomes a gateway drug.
Phelps may be an involuntary hero to this charge, but his name and face bring necessary attention to a farce in which nearly half the nation are actors. It’s time to recognize that all drugs are not equal—and change the laws accordingly.
Kathleen Parker is a columnist for the Orlando Sentinel. Her e-mail address is kparker@kparker.com.


Feb 8, 2009 at 12:22 p.m.
Suggest removal
I agree w/ bubs. I smoke both but try to be courtious of who I smoke around. smoke is harmful- reguardless of what it's from- but otherwise weed has no proven permanent effects on the body unlike alcohol or other hardcore "drugs"
.... the eviler of two evils ....
Feb 8, 2009 at 11:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
What people want to inhale into their bodies is of no consequence to me. As long as smoking marijuana is banned in the same places that smoking tobacco is (which will eventually include bars), I don't really care if people smoke it.
Obviously in an ideal world, no one would smoke anything or put anything remotely harmful in their bodies. I just don't support the idea of regulating it for people.
Feb 8, 2009 at 8:24 a.m.
Suggest removal
The argument for the legalization of marijuana is burdened by the fact the preferred method of delivering THC to the brain is by way of smoking.
If THC is such a good thing and if it should be legal, it should only be legalized in pill form or liquid form -tea.
Feb 8, 2009 at 7:46 a.m.
Suggest removal
I actually agree with William F. Buckley on this one, although for slightly different reasons. In the article below, he lays out the financial costs of enforcing marijuana laws. He points out the ridiculous number of people we put in prison for possessing small amounts of marijuana. He also points out that despite all of our efforts, marijuana is still very accessible.
Personally, I think that it should be legal for adults even if we weren't already spending all the money that we do on enforcement of the current laws. The money we would save and decreased number of people we would put in prison is an added bonus.
I will still never consume marijuana but I don't want to force others not to.
http://www.nationalreview.com/buckley/bu...
Feb 8, 2009 at 2:28 a.m.
Suggest removal
oh heck, legalize and tax it so we can give more money to those poor CEOs.
Feb 6, 2009 at 8:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
This article is so right on! The reason pot is a "gateway drug" is because the source of an illegal substance is likely to have other types of contraband available also (my opinion). Our laws cause a blurring between something that's relatively harmless, but illegal, and stuff that's really. really bad. Once teenagers realize that adults are a bunch of lying hypocrites about marijuana, why would they listen to anyone about the very real dangers of crack cocaine used just once.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.