Pro: Prosperity lies in the huge oil and gas deposits
WASHINGTON EDITOR’S NOTE: The writer is addressing the question, Is drilling into America’s restricted oil and gas reserves the best way to achieve energy independence?
The United States relies on foreign oil for nearly 65 percent of the oil we use—and the level of imports is rising. Energy independence, it is not.
Americans spend $400,000 every minute for imported oil. The cost of importing more than 8 million barrels of oil a day becomes even greater when we consider the military cost of protecting oil transported by tanker from the Middle East and other volatile regions.
Nonetheless, the demand for oil is projected to grow as the United States emerges from recession. The government projects that even accounting for gains in efficiency and an increase in the use of alternative fuels, the United States will require 2 million barrels more of oil per day in 2030, and 1 trillion cubic feet more natural gas every year.
For an economy that depends on energy reliability and wants greater energy independence, there’s only one realistic solution: adopting government policies to boost production of America’s oil and natural gas resources.
The government should allow oil and natural gas production on federal lands and offshore areas that have been off-limits, or where energy development is constrained by restrictive permitting.
These areas stretch from the Rocky Mountains and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic and Pacific. Combined, these areas contain an estimated 102 billion barrels of oil and 635 trillion cubic feet of natural gas that could be recovered with today’s technology—more than the proven energy reserves of most OPEC countries.
The history of energy development in the United States shows that once actual production begins, new discoveries are made and estimates of recoverable oil and gas rise. Case in point: companies conducting tests 175 miles off the coast of Louisiana, 30,000 feet below the surface, came up with potentially the largest American oil discovery in a generation. Experts say there could be as much as 15 billion barrels, doubling U.S. oil reserves.
Recently, drilling began from far off the Gulf Coast, drawing oil from a wellhead nearly 2 miles below the water’s surface, the deepest in the world. Remote-operated vehicles controlled by technicians at the surface do everything from welding to connecting pipelines in thousands of feet of water.
Credit goes to American innovation and technology. Despite some “peak oil” theorists who believe energy supplies are fast running out, we have seen steady upward revisions in U.S. recoverable hydrocarbon reserves as energy companies invent new ways to find and pump oil and natural gas.
The industry has become remarkably efficient. A technique that combines hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling is being used to reach huge amounts of natural gas locked in shale rock. Experts believe that shale gas could meet the nation’s natural gas needs for 100 years or more. In fact, shale gas now accounts for 40 percent of domestic gas production, reversing years of decline.
The success with new drilling technology has made western oil shale, another vast energy resource, much more appealing. Oil shale in western states is estimated to hold 800 billion barrels of oil, double the proven reserves of Saudi Arabia, though new techniques still need to be developed to bring down the drilling costs.
Developing oil and gas resources in the United States, modernizing existing infrastructure and improving efficiency will require not only fiscal stability but policy stability, as well.
If ever there was a time for Congress to reject tax increases on oil and gas companies, it is now. Energy development in untapped government areas could generate more than $1.7 trillion in government revenue, create tens of thousands of jobs, and help reduce our nation’s dependence on foreign oil. The bottom line is that encouraging increased domestic oil and gas production can be a cost-effective, win-win approach to achieving energy independence.
Mark J. Perry is a professor of economics at the Flint campus of the University of Michigan and a visiting economist at the American Enterprise Institute (www.aei.org). Readers may write to him at AEI, 1150 Seventeenth St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036; e-mail: mjperry@umich.edu.

Dec 23, 2009 at 1:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yes Eman, I'm "...one of those tree-hugging fun suckers...". Is that the best you can do; cut and paste the same comments from one op-ed piece to another? Perhaps if YOU had attended a public school (or any school) you would have learned that an indoctrinated person is expected not to question or critically examine the doctrine they have learned. Much like you and others who, even after presented with ample evidence to the contrary, still believe we can "drill baby drill" our way to future energy independence and a cleaner planet.
Dec 22, 2009 at 4:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
Understanding Mr. Perry's argument is MEANT to one sided only, every good economist is familiar with the cost-benefit ratio; an analysis that evaluates the cost-effectiveness of a project or policy. Mr. Perry includes all the benefits but, since its ONLY an argument FOR energy exploration in sensitive areas, not one word is devoted to the cost. So what is the cost when oil is leaked or spilled in a Wildlife Refuge? Just the costs to clean up the Fox River is expected to surpass $1 billion dollars. Sadly, the Fox River can NEVER be "cleaned", just make a little less toxic. So how much does a gallon of fossil fuel REALLY cost? Paying the true cost for energy is what the cap and trade policy is all about.
Dec 21, 2009 at 2:33 p.m.
Suggest removal
Since I'll be the second poster responding to this article, how does this article make it to the "Most Popular Discussions for Stories"?
Dec 21, 2009 at 12:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yep, just keep poisoning our air, we don't need it!
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.