Hiring policy raises standards for Evansville police
Hiring process
The hiring process for officers in the Evansville Police Department include:
-- Assessment test: Candidates must respond to two of five timed scenarios—traffic, interpersonal conflict, crime scene, juvenile crime or a school-related crime—performed by volunteer community members.
People could sell themselves fine in an interview, Officer Patrick Reese said, but "when it came out on the street and they were talking to somebody, they would just break down and they wouldn't be able to communicate with somebody."
-- Panel interview by four members of the police department and four community members.
-- Extensive background check: Good luck hiding your misdeeds. The screening process looks at a candidate's actions throughout his lifetime, including financial, employment and education records, interviews with friends, neighbors, roommates and landlords.
Some interesting questions: Do you have any tattoos? If so, pictures are taken to ensure they're not gang-related. Do you have any subscriptions to publications? If so, what are they? Also, a candidate's spouse/significant other is interviewed in their home to explain the demands of the job and determine if the candidate has support at home for such demands.
-- Personality, psychological, written and drug tests. A physical agility test is being considered.
EVANSVILLE Officer Patrick Reese recalled being kind of surprised by the hiring process when he started at the Evansville Police Department in 2005.
"I just remember when I got hired, I think a few phone calls were made, nothing too exciting was done," he said.
But when former Sgt. William Fitters, who was responsible for background checks in the hiring process, quit before he was charged with two counts of liquor sales without a license, Reese said he and Investigator Mike Laufenberg saw an opportunity.
"I thought even though we're still small-town Evansville, we have to get out of the mentality that, ‘Since we're smaller, maybe we can get away with doing less,'" Reese said. "We're the same police that Madison are, we're the same police the State Patrol are, we're the same police as anybody else in the state of Wisconsin."
Reese and Laufenberg spent months researching how other departments hire officers, attending workshops and talking with experts as they developed a new hiring process.
The standards they wrote have been in place about 12 years, and two full-time officers—Cristian Bennett and Matthew Nankee—and two part-time officers have been hired since. Using the standards in those hiring rounds has weeded out potentially "bad apples" that otherwise could have been hired, Reese said.
"We can train people, that's not the issue," he said. "But we can't train people to be good, ethical, moral people."
Those officers went through a lot more hurdles and verification, and their hiring hopefully is helping to restore trust in the department, Reese said.
"We recognize we've had problem children," Reese said, referring to Fitters and former Officer Jason Grooms, who quit in December 2007 after being cited for disorderly conduct in a Milton bar fight.
Fitters quit in spring 2007 after state agents caught him selling bottles of his homemade "Apple Pie Everclear" to a local bar without a license. Fitters also had served a 60-day suspension in 2006 for unbecoming conduct after an Evansville woman accused him of misconduct, including pressuring her to have sex.
"We really don't want that to happen again," Reese said. "It's an embarrassment to us, it's an embarrassment to our community, and it's hard to recover after something like that and build up peoples' trust."
He's hearing less jokes about "the olden days" now and hopes the public recognizes the problems hopefully have been corrected.
Police Chief Scott McElroy reviews every step of the process and makes the hiring recommendations to the police commission, which makes the final decision.
Police Commission President Scott Brummond said the more exhaustive level of checking makes sure the candidates are qualified, but also a good fit for the department.
"I think the result—time will tell—is certainly the effort that goes into screening the officer candidates is much more intensive than it used to be, and I think we'll see the benefits in the long run," he said.

Sep 8, 2009 at 1:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
They probably couldn't believe that someone was reporting a wounded squirrel and there was more to it. Or it was just a misunderstanding. Hardly an issue!
Sep 8, 2009 at 1:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
The police were called for a wounded squirrel? Really?
Sep 8, 2009 at 12:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
There was no dispatcher--the officer talked to the person reporting the wounded squirrel and came directly to our house
Sep 8, 2009 at 8:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
UWfan -- bet you can blame dispatch on that one, not the officer. Of course you probably told them that an animal was shot around your house, so it's easy to see how that one might get confused. And so what, did the officer draw down on you? Did he shoot you? Hardly a "tail" of woe, except for the animal (and what exactly was it? - stories without pertinent details are more likely to be fabrications!).
Sep 8, 2009 at 7:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
We had a bad experience with one of the officers not repeating a situation as it was reported. A friend told an officer he saw an animal near our house that looked as though it could have been shot. So the same officer came to our house and said it was reported someone was shooting a gun from our house. And Scott McElroy could see nothing wrong with it. This is how stories get twisted and the police are doing it.
Sep 2, 2009 at 10:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
queenb--Are you suggesting that big town cops aren't rude? If so, you'd be in for a 'rude' awakening. Regardless, the lady you are referring to should have reported what she experienced. I don't think that rudeness to a member of the public is a standard to which EPD adheres. As far as the other two officers, you do realize that there are statutory thresh-holds that must be reached before an officer can be fired, right? Only then can a police commission take that final step.
Aug 31, 2009 at 5:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
please excuse my typos its early.
Aug 31, 2009 at 5:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
I am glad to hear this. My the situations with grooms and fitters happened not only with it embarrassing for the department, it was embarrassing for the city. People were angry. Fitters brought shame and disgrace to the dept long before he made moonshine, and should have been let go years ago. grooms it just went to show he thought he was above the law. Actually neither one of them had respect for the law. How are you suppose to respect a officer, when there behavior is questionable at best. I will answer my own question. You don't.
Glad to see this change . Good job.
Aug 29, 2009 at 3:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
Kudos to Patrick/Mike for taking the intitiative on this. On their own, they turned the hiring process into something so much more professional than what it was, to the betterment of the Department and the City. Way to go, guys.
Aug 29, 2009 at 12:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
A physical agility test is being considered.-- I hope it would automatically be included. All police officers should have to pass this as well. We maybe small town but once in a while they do have to run, chase down some crazy kid.
Aug 28, 2009 at 5:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
Good job Resee and Laufy.....Both are doing a great job :-)
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.