DeVoy hearing still in limbo

By ANN MARIE AMES ( Contact )   Friday, Aug. 21, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
 

Photo

Steve DeVoy

— Don’t plan on attending a hearing Monday for fired Darien Police Chief Steve DeVoy.

Today, attorneys for DeVoy and the village of Darien rescheduled Monday’s hearing to Sept 14, 15 and 16. The hearing already had been rescheduled from July. It could be rescheduled or canceled altogether.

Confused?

You’re not alone.

“It is, to say the least, an unusual set of affairs,” village attorney Mark Hazelbaker told the Gazette.

A hearing has been pending to make official the village board’s March 7 vote to fire DeVoy. DeVoy has not worked in the village since December when he was suspended with pay.

The situation is “fluid” as both sides search for alternatives to holding a hearing, Hazelbaker said. Rescheduling the hearing would not stop the two sides from coming to an alternative solution, Hazelbaker said.

Neither Hazelbaker nor village board President Evelyn Etten would use the word “negotiations” or say the two sides are close to reaching a settlement.

“Under the circumstances, all options are being considered without rushing into a hearing,” Etten said.

The board’s last action on the matter was Aug. 11, when the board in closed session “listened to DeVoy give his side of the drama as requested,” Hazelbaker said.

The board voted in closed session to direct Hazelbaker, although he would not say Thursday what the direction was.

After talking with DeVoy’s attorney, “it became clear it would be inappropriate to expend money to prepare for and conduct the hearing scheduled for Aug. 24,” Hazelbaker said.

The Gazette was not able to reach Tom Halloran, DeVoy’s attorney, for comment.

Further confusing the matter is the fact that board member Craig McCue remains hospitalized at Aurora St. Luke’s Medical Center, Milwaukee, Etten said. McCue suffered a stroke Sunday night, officials have said.

Because he is ill, McCue is not available to weigh in on the DeVoy issue, Hazelbaker said. That fact wasn’t part of the decision to reschedule the hearing, but it could be important as the village decides how to move forward, Hazelbaker said.

The discussion already has been a long one.

DeVoy was suspended in December after a village employee found a surveillance camera in a potted plant on her desk in the police department. A second camera was found as well.

Village officials were concerned that the cameras could be a liability for the village. An investigation ensued.

That investigation revealed thousands of documents that investigators say indicate DeVoy spent many hours violating the village’s computer policy. The board March 7 voted 5-2 to fire DeVoy based on that accusation and others, including that DeVoy did not lead the department and had a sexual relationship with a subordinate.

reader COMMENTS
Click here to view reader comments
(18)
4_2LevelHeaded
Aug 28, 2009 at 6:47 a.m.
Suggest removal

I sure am glad you "Know How to Follow The Rules" I am disappointed that a person such as yourself can not act like an adult.

criminy
Aug 26, 2009 at 10:20 p.m.
Suggest removal

According to the article,

"After talking with DeVoy’s attorney, “it became clear it would be inappropriate to expend money to prepare for and conduct the hearing scheduled for Aug. 24,” Hazelbaker said."

This is the village lawyer talking, so what's the holdup on having this settled? Seems like a done deal.

sspoo
Aug 26, 2009 at 10:05 a.m.
Suggest removal

I myself would rather have my tax money paying for police protection that is immediate, instead of having to wait hours for the county. If we would stop paying part timers insurance and employee legal fees, along with attorney fees for Kaufenburg's letters to the editors we could easily afford it.

pilot
Aug 23, 2009 at 12:03 a.m.
Suggest removal

What an enlightening lawyer tale.

I'd hire this guy just for how honest he is.

I know a little about the village story, and Hazalbaker has done the right thing. Amazing.

familyguy
Aug 22, 2009 at 5:52 p.m.
Suggest removal

I agree Me2. Hazelbaker's ethics are quite remarkable and commendable, despite the general public's impression of lawyers.

He clearly has considered the potential financial effects of a hearing on an entire community, acted on his conscience, and is a credit to his profession.

Me2
Aug 21, 2009 at 5 p.m.
Suggest removal

It appears that Attorney Hazelbaker is sticking to great ethics and I applaud him for that. He could very easily take advantage of the current situation and cost the tax payers BIG money.

Before you post a comment, consider this:

Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy Agreement
  • Keep it clean. Comments that are obscene, vulgar or sexually oriented will be removed. Creative spelling of such terms or implied use of such language is banned, also.
  • Don't threaten to hurt or kill anyone.
  • Be nice. No racism, sexism or any other sort of -ism that degrades another person.
  • Harassing comments. If you are the subject of a harassing comment or personal attack by another user, do not respond in-kind.  Hit the "Suggest Removal" button on offensive comments.
  • Share what you know. Give us your eyewitness accounts, background, observations and history.
  • Do not libel anyone. Libel is writing something false about someone that damages that person's reputation.
  • Ask questions. What more do you want to know about the story?
  • Stay focused. Keep on the story's topic.
  • Help us get it right. If you spot a factual error or misspelling, email newsroom@gazettextra.com or call 1-800-362-6712.
  • Remember, this is our site. We set the rules, and we reserve the right to remove any comments that we deem inappropriate.

Post Comment

Commenting requires registration.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

ADVERTISEMENT