Obama backs away from public health insurance plan
Photo 
President Barack Obama, right, shakes hands during a town hall meeting about health care at Central High School in Grand Junction, Colo. Saturday.
WASHINGTON President Barack Obama is willing to embrace insurance cooperatives over a government-run plan as the White House faces mounting opposition to its broad overhaul of the nation's health care system.
Bowing to Republican pressure and offering political cover to fiscally conservative Democrats, Obama's administration signaled on Sunday that it is ready to abandon the idea of giving Americans the option of government-run insurance. The shift leaves open a chance for compromise with Republicans that probably would enrage Obama's liberal supporters but could deliver a much-needed victory on a top domestic priority.
Officials from both political parties are looking for concessions while Congress is on an August recess. Facing tough audiences, lawmakers and the White House are looking for a way to cover the nation's almost 50 million uninsured while maintaining political standing.
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said that a government alternative to private health insurance is "not the essential element" of the administration's health care overhaul. The White House would be open to co-ops, she said, a sign that Democrats want a compromise so they can declare a victory.
Under a proposal by Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., consumer-owned nonprofit cooperatives would sell insurance in competition with private industry, not unlike the way electric and agriculture co-ops operate, especially in rural states such as his own.
With $3 billion to $4 billion in initial support from the government, the co-ops would operate under a national structure with state affiliates, but independent of the government. They would be required to maintain the type of financial reserves that private companies are required to keep in case of unexpectedly high claims.
"I think there will be a competitor to private insurers," Sebelius said. "That's really the essential part, is you don't turn over the whole new marketplace to private insurance companies and trust them to do the right thing."
Obama's spokesman refused to say a public option was a make-or-break choice.
"What I am saying is the bottom line for this for the president is, what we have to have is choice and competition in the insurance market," White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said Sunday.
A day before, Obama appeared to hedge his bets.
"All I'm saying is, though, that the public option, whether we have it or we don't have it, is not the entirety of health care reform," Obama said at a town hall meeting in Grand Junction, Colo. "This is just one sliver of it, one aspect of it."
Lawmakers have discussed the co-op model for months, although the Democratic leadership and the White House have said they prefer a government-run option.
Conrad, chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, called the argument for a government-run public plan little more than a "wasted effort." He added there are enough votes in the Senate for a cooperative plan.
Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., said Obama's team is making a political calculation and embracing the co-op alternative as "a step away from the government takeover of the health care system" that the GOP has pummeled.
"I don't know if it will do everything people want, but we ought to look at it. I think it's a far cry from the original proposals," he said.
Sebelius spoke on CNN's "State of the Union" and ABC's "This Week." Conrad and Shelby appeared on "Fox News Sunday." Gibbs appeared on CBS' "Face the Nation."

Aug 17, 2009 at 7:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
FOTH, hey you like my new fans..there are actually two sock puppets playing on here, can you guess who the puppeteer is?
Aug 17, 2009 at 11:21 a.m.
Suggest removal
Republician pressure? HA!
Aug 17, 2009 at 11 a.m.
Suggest removal
I was shocked that RAF would provide a link to any truth critical of Republicans. Then I looked more closely at the clever username. LOL Now, that's COLD! (Funny, but still pretty cold.)
Aug 17, 2009 at 10:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
Recently on the news we saw thousands of people trying to get medical and dental help from an organization normally functioning in other countries to meet health needs. As the news show interviewed those needing vision, dental and health care, I wondered if perhaps Obama and our present "health care" "one-ness" campaign existing now in heated meetings have not in fact organized this occasion themselves to send out the alarm of the pandemic need in our country for government control over health care. YES, we still must maintain our own freedom to be living separate from government control. YES, we ought to be able to have health care, but let us be just a bit suspicious of why that particular event just happened to pop into existence at this particular time. One must examine this seemingly urgent out of no where clinic in a stadium as if we were at war and treating casualties. Often when a cause wants to have the upper hand, they use this type of hype to win us over, when in reality, they are conning us into thinking that if we do have a say??? We will still maintain our freedoms. To me, this is the beginning of more government control in our lives and they will town meeting us all into complacency. We need to be shrewd when it comes to the present administration or anyone who uses urgency to sway the general public.
Aug 17, 2009 at 8:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
Wonder why the American public was ripped off by the energy sector during the Bush Administration
http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/in...
Aug 17, 2009 at 8:34 a.m.
Suggest removal
This is just so disappointing and baffling. I am an independent but I do support a public option. Why don't people see the 'option' part? And don't the democrats see that they are the supermajority here? Use it! Geez! They are so inefficient compared to the communication machine on the right.
Here is a great place with a ton of information: kff.org
Aug 17, 2009 at 8:07 a.m.
Suggest removal
Wonder why tort reform has not been included in health care reform...
http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/in...
Aug 17, 2009 at 7:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
The next question is... will vocal opponents of the public plan now sigh with relief and fade into the shadows as mandated insurance gets shoved down the throats of 47 million Americans at gunpoint?
Here is what each of the big money players would like...
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2009/07/...
...and who they're expecting will help make that happen:
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2009/06/...
(Click the "Health Sector" heading twice to sort the list by who received the mo$t.)
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.