$3 billion buys not-so-green vehicles
Photo 
In this July 27, 2009 file photo, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood talks during an event in Washington promoting a car buyer incentive program designed to help consumers purchase new fuel efficient vehicles if they trade in their old gas-guzzling cars or trucks.
WASHINGTON Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, the nation's top car salesman in recent weeks, has cited the Obama administration's best-seller list of mostly smaller, fuel-saving cars like the Ford Focus to describe the success of the Cash for Clunkers rebate program.
But what LaHood and other administration officials usually don't mention is that some trucks and sport-utility vehicles that get less than 20 miles per gallon, like the Ford F-150 truck and one version of the Cadillac SRX Crossover, also are being purchased with the new government subsidies. Both are bulky vehicles weighing more than 6,000 pounds when loaded that boast at least 248 horsepower.
Just how many consumers used the federal rebates to buy these larger, not-so-green vehicles is unclear. The Obama administration has declined so far to release detailed records of purchases under the program being compiled by the Transportation Department, listing every clunker deal requesting rebates. The Associated Press requested the data July 31.
The Transportation Department distributes regular summaries of sales from the clunkers program and has used the electronic sales information from dealers to bolster arguments that Americans are dumping gas guzzlers for gas savers. But its failure to release detailed records means the public can't verify those claims.
"Today almost 200,000 new fuel-efficient automobiles averaging 25 miles per gallon are on the road instead of gas-guzzling trucks and SUVs," LaHood wrote on his official blog just before Congress voted to spend $2 billion more for the government rebates last week.
Even the Top 10 list of mostly smaller, fuel-efficient cars that LaHood has cited as evidence of the program's success is being questioned. A different Top 10 sales list produced by Edmunds.com, an auto consumer Web site, from dealer sales data shows fewer small cars and more large vehicles like trucks and utility vehicles make up the best sellers.
Both lists of top sellers include, for example, the fuel-saving Toyota Corolla, and the clunkers program by its definition is encouraging consumers to dump older, less fuel-efficient cars for new, more efficient models.
But the program, now expanded to $3 billion and offering rebates of up to $4,500, isn't limited to the best gas savers on the market. And that's good news to Beny Ledesma, general sales manager at Williamson Cadillac-Hummer in Miami.
The dealership has sold three 2009 Cadillac SRXs — the six-cylinder engine model — through the clunkers program, he said, and is finishing paperwork on two more. Ledesma hopes to sell the other 14 at the dealership, along with some of the Hummer H3Ts on the lot that are eligible for clunker rebates.
Both vehicles get about 18 mpg, considerably less than the 25.3 mpg average that LaHood has attributed to new cars purchased under the clunker program.
"The Cash for Clunkers is definitely generating traffic for Cadillac and Hummer," Ledesma said.
It's not just Honda Civics and Toyota Priuses, two cars that get as much as 29 mpg and 50 mpg respectively, that people can buy with the $3 billion in government rebates. They can also buy versions of the 2009 Lexus RX 350 or 2009 Lincoln MKX, both pricey five-passenger utility vehicles that get about 19 mpg and are capable of towing a small boat.
Buyers must have trade-ins that qualify for such deals — comparable vehicle types with at least 2 mpg less in fuel efficiency than the new purchase. And the new vehicle can't cost more than $45,000.
Even a high-end 2009 BMW X3 crossover utility vehicle, priced at just under $40,000, counts as a gas saver eligible under the government program, with 19 mpg.
White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki said the administration is reviewing the AP's request for the clunkers transaction data that would show all cars purchased and traded under the program, and their fuel efficiency ratings. She said new vehicles purchased are raising the average fuel economy of cars and trucks on the nation's highways and "getting the dirtiest and most polluting vehicles off the road."
Dealers have submitted requests for rebates on 292,447 vehicles sold, at a cost of about $1.2 billion to the government, according to sales data summarized by Transportation Department officials.
It shouldn't come as a surprise that less fuel-efficient vehicles are being purchased with clunker rebates, said Lena Pons of the watchdog group Public Citizen. Congress agreed to loosen fuel efficiency requirements under the program when it passed the initial legislation earlier this year.
Pons said Public Citizen also is seeking sales data from the program to determine whether it has led to drivers replacing larger trucks with smaller cars, or whether vehicles purchased under the program are only marginally better in fuel efficiency.

Aug 13, 2009 at 8:07 p.m.
Suggest removal
chuckie, it says "BEING COMPILED." This program is new and I'm sure all the data just hasn't been compiled into a format that they can release.
Aug 13, 2009 at 7:52 p.m.
Suggest removal
third paragraph says it all.........
The Obama administration has declined so far to release detailed records of purchases under the program being compiled by the Transportation Department, listing every clunker deal requesting rebates. The Associated Press requested the data July 31.
Remember king Obama said ...... we will have a government that the people will be able to see what we are doing........yeah right.........
Tea Party Saturday 9am till noon. Post office here in Janesville "Taxed Enough Already"
Aug 13, 2009 at 1:25 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yay for Keynesian economics, which is the only economics proven to work in a recession.
Aug 13, 2009 at 1:22 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Edmunds.com analysts have determined that in May and June, the average fuel efficiency of recently purchased new cars was 21.8 miles per gallon. Since the program launched, the average has jumped to 23.2 mpg, a 6.1 percent improvement. Those who participated in the program now earn an average of 24.3 mpg with their new purchases. The average fuel efficiency of trade-ins had been 20.0 mpg prior to the program; that number has dropped 9.0 percent to 18.3. The average clunker trade-in earned 16.1 mpg. As mentioned earlier, 39 percent of all recent trade-ins qualified as clunkers."
http://www.edmunds.com/help/about/press/...
Any environmental benefit will be small, but to say that there will be a net energy increase is wrong.
Aug 13, 2009 at 1:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
Yay for Obama socialism
Aug 13, 2009 at 1:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
Over the average lifetime of the average car, ~80% of the energy in the vehicle’s life-cycle is as fuel to run it. After about 8 years, you only need about a 10% improvement in fuel efficiency to make switching to a brand new car the LESS energy intensive choice.
The C4C program is a form of economic STIMULUS. The $3 billion invensted by the government is leveraged 3-5 times that amount at purchase. C4C pulled forward demand, stopped auto dealership defaults and bankruptcy’s, emptied dealer lots and now the auto industry has to resupply inventory. So, the “investment” actually paid off hugely, as the tax increase we might see, will be significantly cheaper than the domino effect of more business closings and more personal bankruptcy’s.
Aug 13, 2009 at 12:25 p.m.
Suggest removal
Again, this "program"(LOL), will likely cause a sizeable INCREASE in net energy consumption EVEN when the "life of the vehicle" is figured in with taxpayers getting ripped to boot with no net increase in jobs over the long term.
Aug 13, 2009 at 12:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
zoom- OK, thats 31% of the total, what about the other 69%?
Aug 13, 2009 at 12:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
Make | Model | Share of sales with clunker trade-ins
Ford Escape 4.8%
Ford Focus 4.5%
Jeep Patriot 3.6%
Dodge Caliber 3.1%
Ford F-150 2.9%
Honda Civic 2.9%
Chevrolet Silverado 1500 2.6%
Chevrolet Cobalt 2.5%
Toyota Corolla 2.3%
Ford Fusion 2.2%
http://www.edmunds.com/help/about/press/...
Aug 13, 2009 at 11:48 a.m.
Suggest removal
oops, I meant to say "overall energy consumption"
Aug 13, 2009 at 11:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
janesvillemom- That is actually not the case, it takes an enormous amount of energy to produce a new car with the energy it takes to manufacture and truck the parts to the auto plants and transport the cars to the dealers...This program will produce ZERO reduction in overall pollution(at best) when all sources involved are figured in, ....It won't produce a net increase in jobs, either, its just postponing unemployment.
Aug 13, 2009 at 10:28 a.m.
Suggest removal
The purpose of the program is to boost new vehicle sales and help the economy, not save the planet. If we weren't in the worst recession since the great depression, this program wouldn't even exist. Any fuel mileage reduction is a bonus.
Aug 13, 2009 at 9:26 a.m.
Suggest removal
So, what, you trade in a "gas guzzler" for a newer version??
Aug 13, 2009 at 9:21 a.m.
Suggest removal
It would be nice to know the numbers of what models where bought. At least show us how many each manufacture sold.
Aug 13, 2009 at 8:13 a.m.
Suggest removal
At least the new car has to get better gas mileage than the trade, so it will lower total gas usage. I do think a minimum mileage rating would have been wise.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.