Keeping transit on track
Podcast Episode
Kyle Geissler talks with Janesville Gazette business editor Jim Leute about a new look at the future of regional transportation in southern Wisconsin.
Photo
JANESVILLE What started six years ago as an idea to extend commuter rail service from Harvard, Ill., to Clinton has evolved into a broader study of Rock County's transportation needs.
The extension of Metra rail service has been—for all intents and purposes—derailed because more workers leave Rock County each day for work in places such as Madison and Rockford, Ill., than those who commute into Rock County or travel to the Chicago suburbs.
Transportation options more in favor are:
-- Commuter rail between Madison and Rockford.
-- Express bus routes between Madison and the Chicago area.
-- Discounted fares on regional bus routes.
-- Van pools between the cities.
That's the consensus of the South Central Wisconsin Commuter Transportation Study, which in July issued a summary of regional transportation options.
Although the group's work started with the idea of extending Metra service, Rock County's location, the travel patterns of commuters and existing transportation infrastructure changed the discussion to include Madison and Rockford, a broader range of transit modes and infrastructure improvements.
"The corridor of travel is really from north to south, and vice versa, with Madison and Rockford as the anchors," said James Otterstein, Rock County's economic development manager. "Given the recent changes in our economic landscape, our transportation options will certainly be impacted."
In its report, the committee noted that recent declines in Rock County's manufacturing sector have been partly responsible for an increased number of local residents seeking employment elsewhere.
In 2000, about 6,700 workers commuted into Rock County, about half the number of those leaving every day for work in other counties. The committee determined that improved transit systems would help residents leaving as well as local employers trying to recruit workers into the county.
Rock County's position as an exporter of workers is expected to increase by 2030, with Dane County continuing to grow as an importer of workers. That's due in part to Rock County's favorable housing costs.
In studying a variety of options, the committee found widespread support for regional transit. Specifically, it learned that:
-- Inadequate regional transit was considered to be the top problem among six transportation issues.
-- Expanding regional transit to Madison and to Chicago was considered an important transportation investment.
-- Expanding regional transit was rated important in enhancing economic prosperity.
-- Connecting area residents to job centers in Madison was most important, followed by Rockford. Demand to Chicago jobs centers was less important.
-- Connecting area residents to non-work destinations was rated high for Madison and Chicago, less so for Rockford.
Alexis Kuklenski, an associate planner with the city of Janesville, said a meeting later this year will lay the groundwork for future work.
Everything the committee has done so far has followed federal guidelines that should make funding for projects quicker and easier to get, she said.
"We've set ourselves up for funding and additional studies," Kuklenski said. "We went broader with this study with plans for more specific studies, whether they're rail, buses or whatever."
Bob Soltau of the Stateline Area Transportation Study, said rail and bus options are probably too costly, as the demands don't seem to justify costs that could run as high as $500 million for rail infrastructure or more than $500,000 in annual operating costs for a new bus service.
While it's not at the forefront, rail service still is important, the group concluded.
"Existing rail lines intersect in downtown Janesville, which makes it the logical location for the area's future passenger rail hub," the group said in its summary. "The area near the Interstate 90/Highway 11 interchange and adjacent to the Union Pacific could serve as a potential site for an intercept passenger rail station serving I-90 travelers."
WHO'S INVOLVED?
Members of the steering committee of the South Central Wisconsin Commuter Transportation include the cities of Janesville and Beloit, the villages of Clinton and Sharon, Rock County, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, the Stateline Area Transportation Study, the Janesville Metropolitan Planning Organization and state Sen. Judy Robson.
EarthTech, Cambridge Systematics and Weaver Consulting were consultants on the study.
Sep 18, 2008 at 2:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
Janesvillean... even 10 years ago in Europe, gas was always the highest there. Perhaps that might be why the village people already been in the process of walking within their area as opposed to driving. I know you will see more scooters, bikes, 2 wheel vehicles, and low gas consumption cars in many Britain movies than the average US movies regardless of time.
Pain is shared by drivers all over Europe, where fuel prices are the highest in the world in Europe: a gallon of gas in Amsterdam costs $7.13, compared with just $2.61 in America.
Just thought I'd point out that US hasn't even come close to seeing what real fuel prices are IMO.
Sep 17, 2008 at 6:56 p.m.
Suggest removal
True enough, biggirl. What we really need is a sustainable growth policy across the board so that people live closer to their jobs and spend less time on the road. (I'm watching a movie set in Britain a century ago, and it's amazing to see everyone in the village walking everywhere they need to go. Of course, nobody but outsiders owned a car.) But that's probably years away unless there's another major oil shock.
Sep 17, 2008 at 2:20 p.m.
Suggest removal
No discussion, have you noticed?, about the need for public transportation as both candidates talk about their energy policy. We need more public transportation of all sorts. It makes the whole area vibrant for families, businesses, and tourists.
Sep 17, 2008 at 12:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
Think, I'd take Van Galder to Madison and then there are Madison-Milwaukee options. Probably easier than going all the way into Chicago unless you insist on taking a train.
.
I've personally done both Van Galder to Chicago (downtown and O'Hare) or driving to Harvard and taking the train. I don't need it anymore but at the time I would have killed for an extension even as far as Clinton! It's pretty clear that the people in Janesville who commute to Chicagoland are mostly not going downtown but to the suburbs or exurbs and jiggering your way there can be a challenge even if you have Metra a block from your house (as I used to).
.
I think the Madison-Rockford corridor is much more viable for some kind of train service, but again, there need to be means at both ends to get home or to work/client. Larger employers can have shuttle buses, but there are limited options for most people.
Sep 17, 2008 at 11:12 a.m.
Suggest removal
I would gladly commute and walk a few blocks to and from work if we had an affordable rail or bus service between my community and Madison.
When I lived in Jacksonville FL, I used a combination of bus and rail to get to work. It cost far less than gassing up the car each week, reduced automobile maintenance costs and saved me the montly fees associated with parking downtown. Best of all, the bus got me there faster than I could drive to work and the monorail station was just outside the building I worked in.
One extremely nice thing about the monorail was that me and my coworkers would often ride it to different sections of city on our lunch hour to try something different for lunch or to do some shopping.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.