City council maintains government structure
JANESVILLE The perception that city employees don't feel safe in airing their grievances is not sufficient reason to change the structure of city government, the city council decided Monday night.
All council members do, however, favor a review of the city's human resources policies by an outside firm.
Changing the city charter ordinance to give the council—not the city manager—authority over the city attorney would have required approval from five of the seven council members.
Four members—Russ Steeber, George Brunner, Kathy Voskuil and Yuri Rashkin—spoke in favor of keeping the structure as is.
Janesville has a council-manager form of government, which Steeber said has served the city well.
Any changes in charter ordinances should be done by referendum, he said.
"If we're going to take and say, ‘This council needs more authority over city employees,' that needs to come from the people within the city," Steeber said. "They are the ones that chose this form of government. … Any change in the charter ordinance needs to come in the form of a referendum."
Council President Amy Loasching put the issues of the city attorney and the human resources policies on Monday's agenda.
She said earlier that she and other council members had heard from some city employees who said they had nowhere to go with employment concerns. Recently, one city employee taped conversations with her supervisors because she was afraid for her job.
Loasching said some employees believe that because the attorney works at the discretion of the city manager, "there wasn't complete faith there. By moving him, by making the council responsible for hiring (and having him report) to the council, you take that question out of everyone's mind."
Councilman Tom McDonald said reality is perception.
"Is there a real problem here? Probably not. We all have confidence in the city attorney. But the perception is that some people might not have much confidence in the position because it is under the manager."
Having the city attorney report to the council rather than the city manager would give the office more independence and assure there would be no conflict of interest, McDonald said.
Kathy Voskuil agreed with Steeber, saying it's difficult to make changes based on perceptions.
"The perception is (in) the past," Voskuil said. "We're no longer in the past. We're going into the future."
Voskuil said Winzenz has taken a proactive approach both in having the personnel policies reviewed and rescinding a city practice of giving preference to the children of city employees when filling seasonal positions.
Brunner said he had concerns about changing the charter ordinance.
"On the other side … it's a long time in coming, but many months ago I asked for some information on charter ordinances and ordinances that gave the city manager extraordinary powers. And I strongly feel this information was withheld from the council."
Employees do have to know they have procedures to follow to air grievances or concerns, he said, agreeing that policies should be regularly reviewed.
Rashkin said the council keeps hearing of employee grievances, but none has been filed and other accusations have been made anonymously.
"We have a solution that's looking for a problem," he said.
Councilman Bill Truman said the council has "100 percent confidence" in Winzenz, who on Monday replaced the retired Steve Sheiffer.
Truman urged employees who have problems to go to Winzenz instead of "taping letters on council members' doors" or calling anonymously.
"Let Jay do his job, and have him move forward," Truman said.
McDonald said he wants to make sure a proper grievance policy is in place, including for people who might have problems with the city manager.
He commended Winzenz for ending the preferential hiring practice, although he stressed employees' children still will be considered for employment.
McDonald said relatives need to stay out of the employment process if there are problems, adding that his comments stemmed from an incident involving Sheiffer and a relative who worked at the ice arena.
"In talking with the city manager, he realizes there was a mistake," he said. "He realizes he shouldn't have gotten involved."
OTHER BUSINESS
In other business, the Janesville City Council on Monday:
-- Voted to amend its lease with Rotary Gardens to allow that board to make changes without the permission of the city. The council asked for a 30-day notice of any admission fee changes. The board recently got permission from the council to charge admission.
-- Approved a process to appoint residents to a citizens committee that would recommend appointments for committees, commissions and boards. The five members would recommend nominees to the manager and council president, who then would bring the recommendations to the council.
The first committee will be chosen by the council president subject to the approval by the council. In determining future appointments, recommendations from the committee would be taken into consideration by the council president. Terms will be for three years. The committee also would include an alternate.
Members of the police and fire commission would continue to be appointed by the city manager, as specified by state statute.
New committee volunteer applications now also are available and will be forwarded to the council. They include the volunteer's occupation, experience, any special qualifications and the reasons he or she wants to serve on the committee.
Sep 10, 2008 at 2:20 a.m.
Suggest removal
JohnDoe, He requested this imformation from Wald Klymchek the city attorney back around sometime in June of this year while Mr Sheiffer was still in office. To me, It stinks of a cover up because I feel the city attorney was covering up Mr Sheiffers abuse of his power in the matter of city employees complaints against him. I too feel there needs to be an explanation or investigation done into this matter.
Sep 9, 2008 at 10:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
"Brunner said he had concerns about changing the charter ordinance."
"On the other side … it's a long time in coming, but many months ago I asked for some information on charter ordinances and ordinances that gave the city manager extraordinary powers. And I strongly feel this information was withheld from the council."
.
I find this comment from Brunner very interesting to say the least.
What I would like to know is from whom did he request this information...and why was it not forthcoming?
.
I think he and the citizens are owed an explanation.
Sep 9, 2008 at 10:23 p.m.
Suggest removal
tallman, Great comment. So very true.
Sep 9, 2008 at 8:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
janesvillean, Alderpersons are elected from districts through out the city, so they represent the citizens within that area. Now at the present you could have all council members live in one 20 square block area. Council memebers are usually for the influencial. Come on, are you attempting to tell me that your city manager has "not" been running the janesville city council and all employees including now to find out the city attorney of all people that should not be answering to one person. You as a citizen can't do anything about how the city manager conducts himself or the business of the city. A mayor, the citizens vote in or out at the end of the term as they do the alderperson that represents them. The Mayor will also be less likely to favor their relatives, past employees and their families for employment. One scandal and their chances for re-election are dismal at best. It is far harder for the alderperson system to hold the "Good Ole Boys" network together as they are usually from many different financial, ethnic, and social structures etc.
Sep 9, 2008 at 7:49 p.m.
Suggest removal
Looks like another "sweep it under the carpet" meeting. For Tom McDonald to say there isn't a problem is rediculous! And for Yuri Rashkin to say "there are solutions but no problems" because no complaints were filed is really rediculous! Just where could the employees have gone to for help???? Come on Yuri, This isn't Russia! And to see Steeber and Voskul (who is a Sheifferite) sit next to each other and "feed" off one another, Omg! Personally, The only one to really stand up for the citizens and city employees is George Brunner. When he asked the city attorney why the attorny didn't provide the council as requested many months ago with the charter ordinances related to sheiffers power structure, The city attorney never answered! Now if that isn't corruption or favoritism on behalf of Sheiffer, Then god help us all! Time for Wald K to go! Yes, The good old "bunch" is at it again!
Sep 9, 2008 at 7:22 p.m.
Suggest removal
Remember Russ steeber and george brunner are cop's ???? retired or not it is still the good old boy's/girl's club in janesville,and everyone can say it is not but they look out after each other so it is a no win situation for the rest of janesville.
Sep 9, 2008 at 5:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
tallman, could you explain why employees today cannot go to any of the seven councilmembers in confidence? Why would an alderperson elected by a district of the city be more responsive to a city employee? If so, why would the mayor be more responsive to the alderman?
.
In council-manager government, the councillors are superior to the manager. In a mayor-alderman government, the aldermen can do very little to an elected mayor.
Sep 9, 2008 at 4:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
thats all good an find but the city councils top priority should be jobs for Janesville Residents once gm leaves an it seems lie the city is trying to side step the issue.
Sep 9, 2008 at 2:30 p.m.
Suggest removal
I'd be okay if the paranoids weren't out to get me!!!
Sep 9, 2008 at 2:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
Snarly, you are on the money. Those that don't want the way city government to change to protect "WHISTLEBLOWERS" is because some are or were government employees in management. Janesville NEEDS a mayor alderperson system as then employees with issues can go to their alderperson in confidence. Your Janesville city manager has had WAY to much power and pay to be evenly effective. To much power corrupts even the best of them. Whistleblowers have always been punished in order to protect those in power. I believe the city employees do have a union but their leaders often conspire with management.
Sep 9, 2008 at 1:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
sounds like the 4 people who do not want change are the good old boy's/girl's club,
Sep 9, 2008 at 12:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
...and so deadbeat workers never get fired.
Sep 9, 2008 at 12:02 p.m.
Suggest removal
Sounds what the City employees need is a union so that they can file legitimate grievances.
Before you post a comment, consider this:
Note: GazetteXtra.com does not condone or review every comment. Read more in our User Policy AgreementPost Comment
Commenting requires registration.